Dear Kiwi-Farms. ( I didn't know where else to put this.) I am not an art thief. - She actually is an art thief.

Why not link us it then so we can see the real story. It is normal for people to hear what he did and immediately beleive it, but if you truly have proof its wrong why did you not use it to help him?


You lied to us you stated that no one watched his computer and their are no rules. That sure sounds like hes being investigated still under his parole. You are simping for a pedophile unless you prove he is not one.
Do you mean this story?
 
Your fucking simping for a dude that got off on OVER 5,000 images of child porn from 8 to 16 years old who are deemed sexually violent predators?

Yea unless you cough up that youtube that shows this is wrong you are a pedophile enabler and i'd question why you want to be around discords which are predominantly teens.

He hasn't served his time he's on the sex offender list as a dangerous offender for LIFE. His time ends when he dies.
 
Come on, you won't get an job with that attitude!
355d5b522c971b2726aa118fb7ae0d75.gif
 
I had nothing to do with that, and clearly he served his time.
Let me help.
Article said:
Both men were classified as sexually violent predators by the state Sexual Offenders Assessment Board and will be required to adhere to Megan’s law for the remainder of their lives.

Under the state probation sentences, they also will be held to several other restrictions, which will prohibit their use of the Internet and social media, Krumenacker said.
Do you see the problem yet?
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Trombonista
You really need to step back and think why a man who is aroused by 8 to 16 year olds wants to be in association with someone who functions at that age.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trombonista
Oooohh.. some people made it seem like *I* was the issue. I had nothing to do with that, and clearly he served his time.
I want to correct something I said earlier. I said it was 1k-2k images but it was really 4500 images on his computer. If you can't see that there is a huge problem here with him going anywhere near your computer, then yeah, you are part of the problem.
 
Your fucking simping for a dude that got off on OVER 5,000 images of child porn from 8 to 16 years old who are deemed sexually violent predators?

Yea unless you cough up that youtube that shows this is wrong you are a pedophile enabler and i'd question why you want to be around discords which are predominantly teens.

He hasn't served his time he's on the sex offender list as a dangerous offender for LIFE. His time ends when he dies.
How the fuck am I a Pedophile Enabler WE ARE NOT AROUND CHILDREN, NOR AM I A CHILD, NOR DO I HAVE ANY INVOLVEMENT WHAT SO EVER WITH CHILDREN.
MY SERVERS ARE EIGHTEEN PLUS.

JUST BECAUSE I KNOW HIM I'M AN ENABLER? THAT'S NOT HOW THIS WORKS.

JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE DID A CRIME DOES THAT MAKE THE PERSON A CRIMINAL TOO?

THATS NOT HOW ANY OF THIS WORKS.

JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE KNOWS SOMEONE THAT DID A CRIME , LIKE SAY A LESS SERIOUS OFFENSE, DOES THAT PERSON NATURALLY BECOME GUILTY TOO?! THAT'S NOT HOW ANY OF THIS WORKS.

BRUH. I'VE LEGIT SHOWED MY PC WILLINGLY AND I'LL DO IT AGAIN.

I want to correct something I said earlier. I said it was 1k-2k images but it was really 4500 images on his computer. If you can't see that there is a huge problem here with him going anywhere near your computer, then yeah, you are part of the problem.
HE ONLY INSTALLED RAM. FOR CRYING OUT LOUD. HOW IS THAT CRIMINAL ACTIVITY?!
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Trombonista
How the fuck am I a Pedophile Enabler WE ARE NOT AROUND CHILDREN, NOR AM I A CHILD, NOR DO I HAVE ANY INVOLVEMENT WHAT SO EVER WITH CHILDREN.
MY SERVERS ARE EIGHTEEN PLUS.

JUST BECAUSE I KNOW HIM I'M AN ENABLER? THAT'S NOT HOW THIS WORKS.

JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE DID A CRIME DOES THAT MAKE THE PERSON A CRIMINAL TOO?

THATS NOT HOW ANY OF THIS WORKS.
You are an enabler because you are complacent in what he has done. You are fighting to state that he did no wrong and he has "served his time." You state you have youtube proof that this info is wrong but you won't link it. So it appears you agree that he has done this and you are supporting him in it.
 
False equivalence, bro.
So say your friend breaks into a bank. you'd also be responsible for that break in too? or is it just me that's being accused of enabling because than you being their friend still would also be considered enabling?

You are an enabler because you are complacent in what he has done. You are fighting to state that he did no wrong and he has "served his time." You state you have youtube proof that this info is wrong but you won't link it. So it appears you agree that he has done this and you are supporting him in it.
I HAVE STATED THAT WHAT HE DID WAS WRONG SEVERAL FUCKING TIMES.
DO YOU NOT READ MY FULL ENTIRE FUCKING STATEMENTS!?
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: Trombonista
So say your friend breaks into a bank. you'd also be responsible for that break in too? or is it just me that's being accused of enabling because than you being their friend still would also be considered enabling?
If you had knowledge of it before it happened or did not report the info you would be responsible.

Your not understanding what i'm saying I am not saying you did any of this. I am saying the way you speak seems you support it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Trombonista
So say your friend breaks into a bank. you'd also be responsible for that break in too?
If you drove him to an bank (or anywhere, really) and if he robs the place, might have killed someone, certain jurisdictions will actually grill you for helping him rob the place by providing him an means of transportation and potentially an means of evading the police
 
  • Like
Reactions: Trombonista
If you had knowledge of it before it happened or did not report the info you would be responsible.

Your not understanding what i'm saying I am not saying you did any of this. I am saying the way you speak seems you support it.
HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU NEED TO READ THAT I DID NOT KNOW WHAT WAS GOING ON; I WASN'T AROUND THIS STATE FOR IT TO HAPPEN?

WHY ARE YOU REPEATING OVER AND OVER AGAIN THE SAME DAMN QUESTIONS?

I DO NOT SUPPORT AGE PLAY OR PEDOPHILIA, IT'S AGAINST MY KINK LIST EVEN. IT'S ON MY ROLEPLAY SERVER LISTS EVEN! FOR FUCKS SAKE IF ANY OF YOU WOULD ACTUALLY VISIT YOU'D KNOW THEIR LYING TO YOU!


If you drove him to an bank (or anywhere, really) and if he robs the place, might have killed someone, certain jurisdictions will actually grill you for helping him rob the place by providing him an means of transportation and potentially an means of evading the police
Bruh, I didn't know him in person Eight years ago. I'm NOT responsible. Stop trying to pin this on me. :|
 
Back