Broken Hands
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2023
And here I was worried that this case would get boring if the en banc was denied! Hardin is my hero
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2022
Hardin is truly our guy, hes okay Jew
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2022
When this is all over, it’d be some real quality content if you got together with a lawtuber like Potentially Criminal to laugh at the lawsuit holistically.
Back in the day, Jim Sterling did a really entertaining video on Digital Homicide after everything was settled. I bet you could recapture some of that energy, especially since Rekieta has mysteriously lost interest in Greer.
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
One of my favorite videos on the Internet. The amount of undue goodwill I have towards Jim for the DigiHom video is unreal.
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2022
The Motion for Change of Venue (and the BIS) certainly seem to be in order.
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
It certainly seems like they might just grant the change of venue just to be rid of the case provided the request is procedurally correct. "We can send this case to Florida and never have to touch it again?" "GRANTED"
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
I smell a new madlibs style copypasta.
It is ADMITTED that you enjoy prison.
It is ADMITTED that you enjoy prison.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
It would be hilarious if the Rule 19 motion prevails. Of course there is just so much motion practice here, Ole Russel has a TON of homework to do responding to all the stuff as is. Requiring him to file another complaint and send service to Google on top is just cruel! Especially for a poor disabled man trying to do this himself.
He may have to hire a lawyer now!
He may have to hire a lawyer now!
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
So this means that we can call Russell Greer a sex pest and a sexual deviant on Wikipedia, since this is a court document?
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
No, stalker child, that's a primary source and you can't use those on Wikipedia.So this means that we can call Russell Greer a sex pest and a sexual deviant on Wikipedia, since this is a court document?
DSP's Tax Lawyer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2021
Russell made an instagram post a while back (its in his main thread) about totally winning this lawsuit because the En Banc got rejected. He has since deleted that post and its just so funny to see him think he has won something only to get hit with the realization that he is still totally fucked
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
Shit, this might delay the release of "She Don't Like Nice Guys (feat. Zachary Staines)".
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2022
I don't know how close to boilerplate text "As best as undersigned counsel can determine, this is an action for purported contributory copyright infringement" is but it made me chuckle.
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2021
Is that legalese for 'we don't know what the fuck this gimpy retard is rambling about, your honour'?
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
Basically, but it has to be said due to the motion Greer to refine his complaint with more clarity. If Nulls answer admits he understands what is being denied then the Judge can just say "well, you seem to clearly know enough about it to deny it".
Alot of answers tend to go off boiler plate and repeated responses, because the rules require that each INDIVIDUAL statement by the plaintiff be responded too. Which can get silly long depending on how rambling the complaint is. More importantly though you don't really want to overly explain yourself at this juncture, especially if you want to get the case tossed procedurally.
End result is a alot of cntrl-c and cntrl-v.
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2023
This is fucking kino. I've never read Russhole's lawsuit but reading the answer paragraph by paragraph kinda lets you infer what it says and where it's going anyway.
I understand why they're called "lolsuits," now.
I understand why they're called "lolsuits," now.
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2020
Poor Russ. He's spent his whole life wanting people to let him explain his plights, and now that Null is asking him to it probably has him tearing out the remainder of his hair.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Reminder. Russ has 14 days to call up Mr. Hardin and propose to him the schedule for the rest of the lawsuit. 14 days after that they "must conduct their planning conference". Within 14 days of that, they also must exchange preliminary discovery information, most notably of which, Russ will have to provide documentation for Null's inspection relating to the alleged damage Null has caused, and documents relating as to how Russ got to that number. Within 35 days of Null's answer (filed yesterday), the parties must file upon the court either an agreed upon schedule, or a request for court to hold a hearing to determine such schedule.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
Mam, this sounds like alot of work. Hope shit lips has lots of free time for the next few weeks.