Russian Special Military Operation in the Ukraine - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

With thermal imaging and everything does camo even work anymore? Should we go back to the brightly colored fashions of earlier wars?

It seems all camo does is give the soldier false confidence that he cannot be seen. If he had garish colours on he might try harder to not be spotted.
One amazing thing about this war is how both sides, but especially the ukie side, has forgotten all the basics about hiding equipment in tree lines.
This could be controversial but the reason all the world is having demographic issues is because everywhere is incredibly urbanized. People in cities have a much harder time forming families and in general people in cities seem to.................
The USSR was onto something when they decided that the ideal city was 200-500k. Big cities really are IQ shredders.
 
There was really nothing wrong done in the earlier video, you have some large misconceptions how battlefield first aid works.
If you want to point out some actual medical misconduct, the Azovstal basement rotward videos would be on point. They condemned most of those men to die.
I understand what you mean but what works for us may not be what works best for the Ukraine right now. Survival rates in Iraq/Afghanistan were fantastic because we had a set up that was able to treat casualties every step of the way, from the battlefield, on the helo and on the plane to Ramstein right before they were met by a team trained to treat their type of injuries. Ukraine is incredibly overextended and while they do manage to give their soldiers good care they simply weren't expecting level of causalities they've taken and continue to take, and we are about to hit the two year mark next month, and it will only get worse, not better. It wasn't just Azovstal, there were peeks into what happened to casualties from the Battle of Bakhmut; US Civil War levels of care, and claims of no anesthetic even for amputations.

What's infuriating is the money, supplies and medications meant for those operating theaters were stolen by commanders and officers of the AFU, and they hid the death rates to pocket the dead soldier's pay since they disburse the payments.

I remember they used to have puff pieces in the MSM about AFU soldiers flown to Ramstein early on. Most of those were "volunteers" from NATO countries and a few lucky Ukrainians. The media doesn't run those stories anymore.
 
you could always make a thread in deep thoughts if you want
This is the last post I will make on this topic. I don't want to derail the thread.

I thought about doing that as a way to organize my thoughts in a clear way but my ideas about things are unique enough that if I ever shared them publicly in real life it creates a connection between my KF account and my irl self. I think the mistake a lot of radicals/people opposed to the current system make is they try to maximize the amount of attention they get and I think you should generally to do the opposite. Probably I'm being paranoid and I won't be important enough for this to matter but I'd still like to be cautious.
There was really nothing wrong done in the earlier video, you have some large misconceptions how battlefield first aid works.
If you want to point out some actual medical misconduct, the Azovstal basement rotward videos would be on point. They condemned most of those men to die.
You forgot to also mention the Santa hats. You did mention it in your first post but not this one. The Santa hats are stupid, out of place and possibly unhygienic.

Also Azovstal was such a weird situation. You had a bunch of criminals being used by Neo-Nazis officers as cannon fodder in the remnants of a old soviet steel mill in order to delay the Russians and take up valuable Russian manpower. In addition, Azov battalion was not well liked by the Ukrainian leadership as they heavily mistrusted them so having them all die was beneficial in a lot of ways. Furthermore this same group captured civilians and held them hostage and used civilians as humans shields a lot leading to some Ukrainian civilians hating them. In addition, Azov Battalion had connections to the CIA and western intelligence. Oh and the only reason Azov Battalion could communicate with the outside world is because Elon helped the Ukrainian military with Starlink. It is such a bizarre scenario.
With thermal imaging and everything does camo even work anymore? Should we go back to the brightly colored fashions of earlier wars?

It seems all camo does is give the soldier false confidence that he cannot be seen. If he had garish colours on he might try harder to not be spotted.
This is kind of true I don't think camo is as useful as it once was and probably it will get even less useful. But I can imagine camo making it just a little bit harder to recognize someone if only for a second. And that second can matter a lot.

Ukraine is incredibly overextended and while they do manage to give their soldiers good care they simply weren't expecting level of causalities they've taken and continue to take, and we are about to hit the two year mark next month, and it will only get worse, not better.
Logistics are important. It affects not only how much you can field and when and where but it also impacts how many of your wounded stay casualties or end up as fatalities. The logistical situation seems to have been a nightmare for Ukraine in a lot of ways. Or at least that is my impression.

Is that the impression of everyone else?
 
This is kind of true I don't think camo is as useful as it once was and probably it will get even less useful. But I can imagine camo making it just a little bit harder to recognize someone if only for a second. And that second can matter a lot.
Does that outweigh the risk of friendly fire? With camo you can't tell who it is but you can still tell there's someone there. With traditional uniforms who's who is pretty distinctive. Drones do a very good job of spotting soldiers with camo, so I don't know if there would be much benefit. Even if they train an ai to fire at the colours, the soldiers could place a scarecrow to make the ai out itself.
 
Does that outweigh the risk of friendly fire? With camo you can't tell who it is but you can still tell there's someone there. With traditional uniforms who's who is pretty distinctive. Drones do a very good job of spotting soldiers with camo, so I don't know if there would be much benefit. Even if they train an ai to fire at the colours, the soldiers could place a scarecrow to make the ai out itself.
I think it's less "Camo is useless" and more "the overall shape of soldiers is too similar now". Back before the current era of "plate carriers" and #OperatorAsFuck larpware "helmets", troops from different nations didn't just use different camouflage, but their overall shape was different. The helmets, rucksacks, load bearing equipment, and stuff like that made even similarly looking troops stand out. The shape of an American GI and his equipment was different from a German Schütze, even without weapons.

I remember seeing a picture that had a soldier from every Warsaw Pact nation with their arms on each other's shoulders, and while they looked similar, they also stood out from each other. The Czech and East German guys both had "raindrop" camo, but their helmets and rifles were different, and the Czech's camo was a different set of colors and tones than the East German's, and the belts were colored differently as well. At a distance, you could still tell they were from different nations, even with similar equipment.
 
The logistical situation seems to have been a nightmare for Ukraine in a lot of ways
Yes, and no. The Ukraine was caught by surprise by the invasion (as was the US). The problem isn't that the AFU was incapable of adapting, its that they have several obstacles in their way, namely, the US/NATO advisors that were unfamiliar with Ukraine (and more importantly, Russia); the fact that the Ukraine was primed to go on the offensive and suddenly had to pivot to a defensive footing, and lastly, but most important, the Ukrainian compulsion to steal and rob everything not bolted down (and even then they had enterprising hohols that were ready with power tools), just in case Ukraine became Russia again.
 
What carried the day for Ukrainians was that on Russia's part. This was a half-arsed attempt at an invasion especially in terms of an invasion force which lacked in number of areas, especially manpower

The combat footage and some OOB documents Ukrainians captured showcased how thin the manpower within the force was. I said this before here. For example A 20-31 tanks strong tank battalion, had a infantry support consisted of 24-26 men or less. Or a infantry company having it's rifle squads with 5-6 men strong including in some case including the vehicle crew. Which is fucking bad like really bad.
Russia was never committed to actually capturing Kiev/Ukraine by force. Its very apparent now that they thought Ukraine would collapse as soon as they saw the tanks and helos streaming across the border. They did not anticipate Ukraine actually trying to fight them back.

Ukraine held out long enough for the globohomos to start dumping billions and billions of dollars worth of hardware and the rest is history, its now the meatgrinder its been the past 2 years. If this continues to go the way its been going Russia will most certainly "win", but will pay an exceptionally high price for what they get.
 
Russia was never committed to actually capturing Kiev/Ukraine by force. Its very apparent now that they thought Ukraine would collapse as soon as they saw the tanks and helos streaming across the border. They did not anticipate Ukraine actually trying to fight them back.

Ukraine held out long enough for the globohomos to start dumping billions and billions of dollars worth of hardware and the rest is history, its now the meatgrinder its been the past 2 years. If this continues to go the way its been going Russia will most certainly "win", but will pay an exceptionally high price for what they get.
The West has been training and arming Ukraine for the past ten years. Russia and Kiev had an agreement for a cessation of hostilities in March 2022 that Boris Johnson convinced Zelensky to renege on. So Russia's Plan B was put in motion: methodically destroy Ukraine's military. Slower, but better and more permanent results. As far as the price, that's subjective, and depends on whose word you take.
 
Last edited:
So Russia's Plan B was put in motion: methodically destroy Ukraine's military. Slower, but better and more permanent results. As far as the price, that's subjective, and depends on whose word you take.
No.

Russia thought this was gonna be Crimea 2.0. Roll in with your military and watch Ukrainians do nothing. Except the Ukrainians did something this time and so far Russia has probably lost 30k+ troops and turned a decent portion of what once was very fertile, useful Ukrainian territory into a toxic waste dump of UXO, bodies and destroyed armor.

This has turned into a slow meatgrinder because its very clear Russians have zero capability to execute combined arms tactics. Theyre stuck moving inch by inch throwing columns of men and vehicles at a position/city until they take it.
 
Russia was never committed to actually capturing Kiev/Ukraine by force. Its very apparent now that they thought Ukraine would collapse as soon as they saw the tanks and helos streaming across the border. They did not anticipate Ukraine actually trying to fight them back.

Ukraine held out long enough for the globohomos to start dumping billions and billions of dollars worth of hardware and the rest is history, its now the meatgrinder its been the past 2 years. If this continues to go the way its been going Russia will most certainly "win", but will pay an exceptionally high price for what they get.
That was one theory posited by pro-Russia twitter.
The other one was that the northeastern assault force was nothing but an elaborate decoy intended to distract the ukrops and prevent them from sending significant reinforcements to the majority of their units in the Donbass front.
These units on the Donbass front that were destroyed in the first wave of Russian attacks constituted the vast majority of the nato trained forces that the ukrops had raised during the post 2016 stalemate.

The Ukro simps and minions of the military industrial complex are working overtime in damage control with this one.

You can judge a person's IQ by what they see in this video.
View attachment 5646911
The question here should be:
Were the ukrops using depleted uranium rounds?
The decision by the west to allow them access to those rounds is fairly recent and I do not think that all ukrop M2/M3 APCs are stocked with them.
 
Roll in with your military and watch Ukrainians do nothing
Well, that's what happened, initially. Or did you not see Kiev surrounded by Russian armor?
turned a decent portion of what once was very fertile, useful Ukrainian territory into a toxic waste dump
Preferable to a hostile NATO base, yes.
its very clear Russians have zero capability to execute combined arms tactics
That's absolutely false, and the AFU has never said the like; hohol CISPO on the other hand, posts that and other "ruZZians r dum" all over the internet.Seems you fell for it.
 
That was one theory posited by pro-Russia twitter.
The other one was that the northeastern assault force was nothing but an elaborate decoy intended to distract the ukrops and prevent them from sending significant reinforcements to the majority of their units in the Donbass front.
Its painfully obvious it was all a bluff, it wasnt cover for actions elsewhere.

Russia committed its absolute best troops Day 1 into scaring Kiev into submission. That air assault at Hostomel was 100% gamble based upon thinking the Ukrainians where going to do nothing to stop them. Then they backed it up with a 60km long line of armor/vehicles for a week or two that they ultimately did nothing with because Russia either didnt have the stomach for sieging/assaulting Kiev or never had the capability. Once Ukraine failed to capitulate they turned around and went home and meatgrinder turned on.

That's absolutely false, and the AFU has never said the like; hohol CISPO on the other hand, posts that and other "ruZZians r dum" all over the internet.Seems you fell for it.
Ive seen enough videos of Russians being absolutely annihilated due to sheer retardation to know they have very serious issues with battlefield tactics. They simply throw men and firepower at a objective until they take it.

Heres a fantastic and fairly recent example of this. A platoon worth of Russians being utterly destroyed in idiotic fashion;

 
Last edited:
This has turned into a slow meatgrinder because its very clear Russians have zero capability to execute combined arms tactics. Theyre stuck moving inch by inch throwing columns of men and vehicles at a position/city until they take it.
This is quite the bombastic statement. It makes me wonder are you even in the right thread? There is a pro-Ukraine thread if that is where your sympathies lie.

But I will address the combined arms tactics claim. Though you should call it combined arms warfare because it isn't just a tactical thing.

I think the most obvious example of Russia utilizing combined arms was their defense during the Ukrainian counter-offensive of Summer/Fall 2023. They used aircraft artillery infantry assaults and armored vehicles extensively to great effect. The Ukrainians didn't even manage to get to the 2nd line.

But let's also talk about Russian Offensive use of arms warfare. One of these utilization of combined arms warfare that ended up working quite well was the Wagnerite's quick capture of Soledar. The Musicians managed to leverage infantry assaults and artillery to quickly capture Soledar. They didn't use armored vehicles all that much because armored vehicles generally aren't too effective for urban combat. But nonetheless the Russians won a large battle much quicker than expected using combined arms warfare.

There has been one of Russia's combined arms that Russia has been very reluctant to use. Russia is reluctant to use infantry and thus take large casualties. They have been trying to leverage their greater possession of armored vehicles, drones and mostly artillery with a bit of cautious infantry action thrown in. It has been successful so far in attritting the Ukrainian Army. But willingness does not equal capability.
 
Its painfully obvious it was all a bluff, it wasnt cover for actions elsewhere.

Russia committed its absolute best troops Day 1 into scaring Kiev into submission. That air assault at Hostomel was 100% gamble based upon thinking the Ukrainians where going to do nothing to stop them. Then they backed it up with a 60km long line of armor/vehicles for a week or two that they ultimately did nothing with because Russia either didnt have the stomach for sieging/assaulting Kiev or never had the capability. Once Ukraine failed to capitulate they turned around and went home and meatgrinder turned on.
Why are you pretending the Istanbul Agreement never happened?
Ive seen enough videos of Russians being absolutely annihilated due to sheer retardation to know they have very serious issues with battlefield tactics. They simply throw men and firepower at a objective until they take it.
Bruh. You can look in this, and the previous threads to see holhols being annihilated every day. Even the hohols estimate the average daily losses of the AFU are 800-850 daily. That's why they're mobilizing women and cripples. Its over.
lol you have to go back to reddit the cope thread. Same thing
 
With thermal imaging and everything does camo even work anymore?
Most modern uniforms make an attempt at mitigating your visiblity on thermals. Most thermal optics arent really temperature based, they estimate your termperature based on what part of the infrared band you are radiating on the most, and then compare the intensity of the radiation to what would be expected of from a blackbody. Most inert crap on the ground is a black body, so it tends to highlight artificial things relatively well in most conditions without taking undue notice of hot rocks in the sun and so on (this is my understanding from my own reading). You can make your soldiers more blackbody-like intentionally.

People still look around with their eyes a lot, and with the understanding infantry engagements often happen at 50-200 meters, camo does a lot to lessen the distance you get spotted at.

The Ukro simps and minions of the military industrial complex are working overtime in damage control with this one.

You can judge a person's IQ by what they see in this video.
View attachment 5646911
I was kindof baffled by how this seems to end with the tank being disabled. It really looks like the M2s are engaging with HEI belts which don't really penetrate steel armor at all. The guys in the tank honestly may have wound up abandoning a mostly undamaged vehicle.
 
I was kindof baffled by how this seems to end with the tank being disabled. It really looks like the M2s are engaging with HEI belts which don't really penetrate steel armor at all. The guys in the tank honestly may have wound up abandoning a mostly undamaged vehicle.

Optics, tracks and other "soft" parts are taken out. Which mission kills a tank.
 
Optics, tracks and other "soft" parts are taken out. Which mission kills a tank.

They could still just open the driver hatch if all the periscopes are blown out and drive away off of that, once they get turned around and facing away from the incoming fire. It looks like they crash into a tree and get stuck in one of the other videos and then bail out. I cant understand what happened other than stupidity.

Mission kill sure, but regular kill surely not?
 
Back