@Android Raptor Love Thread

1705810388438.png
 
post I make is analyzed by obsessed retards on OF who write weird fanfiction about me being Null/his secret gay lover.
Have you ever considered making a sock for your gender-critical posts? Lots of your takes were pretty thunk-provoking and the man hate thread is pretty chill now.
 
Why bother debating this fuckstick in good faith when he's clearly too stupid to understand abstract distinctions? It's more fun to just piss him off.
Because I enjoy challenge and debate, and because I'm terminally optimistic and hold out hope that even the most dogmatic will engage thoughtfully, even when all signs indicate that that's a pipe dream.

I'm always open to learning or acquiring new things to consider, and providing same. Occasionally there is someone with a similar perspective, so I like to parry for awhile, until it's clear that even given all the rope I allow I'm dealing with a complete imbecile. This poster is dogmatic but had some response, so even if he was an asshole about it, I'm more interested in seeing if the ideas have some defensible basis or are just reflexibly positional. If not, no big deal to ne/it's not my formulation of belief that is at stake.
 
because I'm terminally optimistic
well, you're a better man than I am.

I used to debate people on theology on Ye Olde IMDb message boards, sometimes for months on end. I would painstakingly exposit copious scriptures, prepare my carefully thought out exegesis, dutifully cite my sources, prove my points, state my case, and at the end of it all the same people would always just go "DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUH THAT'S NOT WHAT I BELIEVE, MY BELIEFS ARE CORRECT, I'M RIGHT AND UR RONG DUUUUUUUUUUUUUUH"

Sort of like what's happening here, in this thread. It's not my fault if other people are stupid.

so these days I'd rather just verbally kick the shit out of so-called "Christians" and abuse them for my own amusement. It accomplishes just as much. Admittedly it makes me look jaded and angry, but then I am, so that's how it comes out.
 
Everything that made the cut to be placed into the anthology that is the Bible was decided on by humans.
This line of thinking call the entire Bible into question, considering who wrote it, these weeds are not worth getting into.

do you not think there is any consideration for societal context in evaluating the words of the Bible?
No, because God is the same as ever, not changing with the times, so we can evaluate it no differently than before.

If the Word of God makes such sharp distinctions between men and women and their societal standing/function ...why is it that parables and lessons should apply to everyone, despite only sometimes referring to both men and women, and often referring only to men and using groups/statuses that could only be held by men?
So I really need to point out the million scriptures which make sharp distinctions between the genders? It doesn't mean they're an entirely different species, of course much applies to both, but gender roles and expectations exist. It seems baffling that you're implying otherwise.

I'd also add that unlike the men who sent letters or wrote the various books, Jesus dealt with women very differently than those men. He discussed theology with the woman at the well, despite the fairly shocking unusualness of this and the shock it gave the local men.
I never suggested they were subhumans, or to be treated completely differently in every context. But you seem to be gunning for some radical gender role abolition nonsense which is not Biblical. Just one of several examples:

"To be discreet, chaste, keepers at home, good, obedient to their own husbands, that the word of God be not blasphemed." - Titus 2:5

And between Jesus's actions/effects and Paul's words, which should be given more weight?
You've not articulated a contradiction, but if one existed, obviously Jesus.

It is not. Paul is not the Son of God.
Again, I never suggested otherwise, you simply seem to be conflating sacrilege with blasphemy, they're not interchangeable.

That is a statement on the nature of humans/humanity, not an excuse for a purported Christian to justify acting contra the Word.
It's like a field of strawman arguments... It's not an excuse, it's a reality. Even Christians are capable of sin.

Why bother debating this fuckstick in good faith when he's clearly too stupid to understand abstract distinctions? It's more fun to just piss him off.
Projection, you're just a bundle of nerves and emotions. You're not pissing anyone off except yourself, spiraling into frothing rage over being wrong.

Why would he need too? He did the real thing.
Maybe he was a "principled" defender of free speech like you? Just wondering what you think.

"If the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of divine reward, then brother, that person is a piece of shit."
 
They're the only Muslims taking their religion seriously. Too bad their religion is terrible, they'd be good Christians with that zeal.
Any woman that encounters you in the real world should get a restraining order against you. You're clearly fucked in the head.

And I've heard all your arguments many times, from men who beat their kids, fucked their own daughters, beat the shit out of their wives, were drunks, embezzlers, violent criminals, all manner of scum hiding behind the "rightness" of their religious beliefs.

The reason I won't debate you on your psychopathic bullshit is not because you're "right." It's because you're utter slime. Your spectacular arrogance proves it.
 
Any woman that encounters you in the real world should get a restraining order against you.
Because I think they should not be pastors? You're a pretty extreme feminist, I've never heard anyone go that far yet.

You're clearly fucked in the head.
Your unhinged posts prove this is projection. lol calm down

And I've heard all your arguments many times,
Have you ever properly rebutted them, or just cry and scream and shit yourself like now?

The reason I won't debate you on your psychopathic bullshit is not because you're "right." It's because you're utter slime.
Hm... I'm pretty sure the real reason is that you can't. You've spent pages saying you won't debate me, yet keep chimping out, so it looks like you CAN'T, not won't.

Your spectacular arrogance proves it.
Yep, it's something I need to work on, like you with your anger, and stupidity. Not sure you can work on the latter but you should try.
 
I'm pretty sure the real reason is that you can't
Why would I bother? You've been refuted by half a dozen other people already and yet you keep regurgitating the same tired arguments, returning "like a dog to his vomit."

If you're a "Christian," I'm Napoleon Bonaparte. You're a "Christian" like Jeffrey Dahmer was a "sous chef."
 
Why would I bother?
This line would work if you ignored me instead of engaging seethingly. If you can bother to whimper and moan at me, you can bother to articulate your simple little thoughts too.

You've been refuted by half a dozen other people
Unsuccessfully, and only one (@Friend of Dorothy Parker) really put forth a substantial argument, aside from your loli gore goddess, @Android raptor who can at least hang better than you.

You're a "Christian" like Jeffrey Dahmer was a "sous chef."
He was head chef, actually, so I guess you think I'm a pretty good Christian.
 
I guess you think I'm a pretty good Christian.
I think you're a self-righteous piece of shit and not even remotely an actual Christian.
[13] But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven against men: for ye neither go in yourselves, neither suffer ye them that are entering to go in.
[14] Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye devour widows' houses, and for a pretence make long prayer: therefore ye shall receive the greater damnation.
[15] Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye compass sea and land to make one proselyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold more the child of hell than yourselves.
[16] Woe unto you, ye blind guides, which say, Whosoever shall swear by the temple, it is nothing; but whosoever shall swear by the gold of the temple, he is a debtor!
[17] Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gold, or the temple that sanctifieth the gold?
[18] And, Whosoever shall swear by the altar, it is nothing; but whosoever sweareth by the gift that is upon it, he is guilty.
[19] Ye fools and blind: for whether is greater, the gift, or the altar that sanctifieth the gift?
[20] Whoso therefore shall swear by the altar, sweareth by it, and by all things thereon.
[21] And whoso shall swear by the temple, sweareth by it, and by him that dwelleth therein.
[22] And he that shall swear by heaven, sweareth by the throne of God, and by him that sitteth thereon.
[23] Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law, judgment, mercy, and faith: these ought ye to have done, and not to leave the other undone.
[24] Ye blind guides, which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel.
[25] Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.
[26] Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.
[27] Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men's bones, and of all uncleanness.
[28] Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity.
[29] Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! because ye build the tombs of the prophets, and garnish the sepulchres of the righteous,
[30] And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets.
[31] Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets.
[32] Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.
[33] Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?


 
I think you're a self-righteous piece of shit and not even remotely an actual Christian.
And you base that on what, is citing random scripture without any sort of argument as to how they apply supposed to be a mic drop moment? :story:

You should make a hate thread for me already, you're going to blow a blood vessel nigger
 
You are not a Christian. Anyone that has mistaken you for one should reevaluate. You're just a pompous arrogant windbag little troll, misusing Biblical arguments to be a pompous arrogant windbag asshole. Pathetic.
The only kernel of truth in your pile of shit responses is that I'm arrogant, if you think I misused the Bible then explain how.

You won't, you can't; cope and seethe.
 
Back