@Android Raptor Hate Thread

@Android raptor
@SSj_Ness
C00B7BE0-A489-4563-B9F8-487F1F3FAEBC.jpeg
 
  • Islamic Content
  • Horrifying
  • Deviant
Reactions: NewnameRealEmail, Space Faring Marsupial, Begemot and 7 others
Bargain Bin Laden said:
I was the first one who asked Android Raptor if she thought lolicon should be legal.
Click to expand...
Gog & Magog said:
I was the first one who asked for her nonconsenual pornography knowledge! But, you do have a point so let's say it was a group effort.
Click to expand...
Don't forget me, I asked if she'd still defend all of that even if I added a gore modifier... And she did! :story:

Bargain Bin Laden said:
@Android raptor
@SSj_Ness
View attachment 5654407
Click to expand...
I'll meet you in the middle and blow a kiss.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Islamic Content
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Begemot, AgendaPoster, Gog & Magog and 2 others
SSj_Ness said:
What about people who defend it?
Click to expand...
PistachiosOnMyDesk said:
Sure - and you can hate me as much as you want, but what SSJ_Ness just said is important. Do you really want to keep simping for a person who is apparently pro-child-porn? You've been up her ass defending every little thing she says and dunking on anybody who detracts against her. You said that anyone who draws or uses "loli" (I just call it child porn, because that's what it is) should be hanged. If you feel that way, surely this lowers your opinion of someone who's out here saying that it's great?
Click to expand...
It depends on if they are clearly a pedophile trying to normalize their shit. I believe a lot of them are essentially misguided but good intentioned for wanting to protect free speech. Essentially, they think the government will ban stuff like Berserk if they get the power to get rid of lolicon and shotacon. I don't think that will happen because I'm Canadian and we haven't banned Berserk but mistrusting the government isn't always from a bad place.
Plus, I don't agree with even close to all her takes or try to defend them all but I appreciate them usually for preventing an echo chamber. She's an atheist or agnostic I'm pretty sure and I'm a polytheist, she's not against mass migration and miscegenation and I am, she's bi I'm straight, she's a progressive and I'm a third positionist, she's a lot more pro-trans than me etc.
PistachiosOnMyDesk said:
Thanks. He got thrown out of my house when I was a kid after my mom first asked me if maybe I just dreamed it (no, cunt). Later, as an adult, I broke his jaw. It's less than I wanted to do but I didn't feel like going to prison. I'm doing fine, thanks.
Click to expand...
Based.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
Reactions: Android raptor and Billy Bob Dick
Null said:
Arguing AOC is the least productive thing on the Internet. It's one of those traps you stay away from if you're not retarded.
Click to expand...
I agree. But I didn't bring it up even once, and that didn't stop me from getting accused of it. That guy did, sure - but only after she singlehandedly tried to transform the thread into a soapbox for her pet issue. Even the thread OP had to step in and tell her that, no, the thread didn't exist for the reason she was telling people it existed.
Null said:
Mod also opted for a WEEK LONG BAN instead of anything significant so there's literally no reason to call grand conspiracy here.
Click to expand...
I'm not saying that the guy shouldn't have been temp-threadbanned, or that the punishment was something "significant." I'm saying that he was guilty of basically the same thing that she was doing first, only she got a pass and he didn't. The inconsistency is the problem, not the punishment in and of itself.
Null said:
If you're going to try and claim some protective conspiracy bubble around specific users you better be fucking right, dumb faggot.
Click to expand...
Call me a dumb faggot for it if you want, but this is my perspective. As far as I can tell, she is getting carte blanche to do shit that other people are being punished for. You apparently disagree, and that's fine. What am I going to do - argue with you? It's your forum.
 
  • Feels
  • Dumb
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: NewnameRealEmail, topsykrets, Begemot and 2 others
Null said:
your perspective is objectively wrong, I have documented why it is wrong, and you should end your life.
Click to expand...
You documented that guy was doing thread-derailing. I never said that he wasn't. You documented that someone who wasn't Android raptor sent in the reports. I'm not sure what this proves considering she has a horde of simps but - whatever - it's not germane to my point.

As far as I can tell you documented nothing about her thread-derailing soapbox behavior in the thread, which is my issue here. Calling me names and telling me to kill myself is not really going to change the fact that she's being allowed to do shit that other people are being punished for.

Seriously, can you name one thing I've said that's objectively wrong? I'm not trying to be an asshole here, but I'm mystified and I'd genuinely like to understand what you mean. Was it my rhetorical hyperbole when I said "threadbanning anyone who said anything against you"? What?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Autistic
  • Dumb
Reactions: Jhonny Jhon, Begemot, Null and 6 others
Sparkling Yuzu said:
Essentially, they think the government will ban stuff like Berserk if they get the power to get rid of lolicon and shotacon. I don't think that will happen because I'm Canadian and we haven't banned Berserk but mistrusting the government isn't always from a bad place.
Click to expand...
That's more or less my perspective. Especially since the US has a history of going nuts with censorship in the past i.e. the Comic and Hays codes.

The instant you harm an actual person or animal though, you should be arrested.
 
  • Feels
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Shidoen, Billy Bob Dick and Sparkling Yuzu
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back