Does America know war? Cars. Texan rebellion. Socialism. Lenin. Whatever the fuck else. You’ll find it all here

The Ugly One

Piss Towel Therapist
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Nov 15, 2021
All the "anti-racism" revisionism came at the barrel of a gun.

More like it came with a big check attached. I don't think the UK was ever in danger of invasion from the USA.

Corrupt the country itself including its army with insane politics, isolate it geopolitically and destroy every place that wont turn its back on it and then plunge it into a war it cant win to finish it off. That does not sound like a good plan, unless your goal is the end of America as we know it.

Or if you're fucking retarded and have lived the coddled life of an upper-class midwit since the day you were born.

Imagine if these were allowed to be sold in the USA, with all its benefits and low cost compared to other Western vehicles of the same type? A good all-purpose utility vehicle that can be owned on a budget? It'd outsell its competitors so hard it'd be hilarious.

If you could sell it in America, i.e. just dispense with all the environmental & safety regs that make such a vehicle illegal here (doubt it even has a catalytic convertor), it would have tons of competitors. Toyota would still be making 70s model Land Cruisers.
 
Imagine if these were allowed to be sold in the USA, with all its benefits and low cost compared to other Western vehicles of the same type? A good all-purpose utility vehicle that can be owned on a budget? It'd outsell its competitors so hard it'd be hilarious.

I think this is also a real reason for these "sanctions"...they know Russian goods would be very competitive compared to their Western counterparts. Hence the "sanctions" and smearing Russian products as cheap and shoddy.
having good quality long lasting cheap vehicles would be a game changer for so many people. It might be possible to import older models that are too old to have import restrictions, but it wouldn't be cheap
 
How fucking old are you?
Old enough to have gone to school when the free lunch wasn't the main attraction, so I earned two university degrees. Unlike you, apparently.
I just hope that the "revolutionaries" aren't pseudo intellectuals of the Red variety this time around, but of fucking course they probably will be because the human race refuses to learn from its mistakes.
There's no real organized opposition to the current degenerates in control right now. Right now, the "opposition" in the US consists of small groups that are either deranged leftists (Antifa) or deranged far right wingers (Patriot Front) who are grifters and controlled by the feds. You can tell because the Eagle Pass standoff took both of them by surprise; otherwise, they'd have been bitching on X for weeks.

Remember, the Bolsheviks weren't the most popular, just the best organized. And it didn't happen overnight.
 
Old enough to have gone to school when the free lunch wasn't the main attraction, so I earned two university degrees. Unlike you, apparently.

There's no real organized opposition to the current degenerates in control right now. Right now, the "opposition" in the US consists of small groups that are either deranged leftists (Antifa) or deranged far right wingers (Patriot Front) who are grifters and controlled by the feds. You can tell because the Eagle Pass standoff took both of them by surprise; otherwise, they'd have been bitching on X for weeks.

Remember, the Bolsheviks weren't the most popular, just the best organized. And it didn't happen overnight.
History is an ongoing series of events that people truly believed would never happen. But seriously though, imagine if Antifa was the ruling party, how fucked would we be...
 
Bolsheviks weren't the most popular, just the best organized
I wouldn't even put it like that. I would say the Bolsheviks had Lenin that was their single advantage over everyone else. Lenin was an extremely competent revolutionary.

There is no one nearly this competent around in my opinion. In regards to the US I don't think it had a lot of Juice left honestly. Part of the reason the USSR could be so successful was because the Russian Empire was so successful. The Russian Empire had a lot of land and a lot of resources and people. It was just really poorly organized and run to the point so much of its wealth went to paying for worthless elites.

There won't be a communist revolution that conquers the entire US like with what happened with the USSR because the US is not in the same state as the Russian Empire. I suspect what will happen is large chunks of the United States will simply break away.

This is already happening very clearly as can be seen in Texas. There were already small signs of Abbott doing this type of thing btw. Abbot negotiated with the Mexican government after basically using inspections to close the Mexican-Texas border. That is something that a State is not supposed to do. But that was much quieter.
 
There won't be a communist revolution that conquers the entire US
It wasn't my intent to suggest it would happen in the US, just to point out why it worked in Russia when it didn't in other countries at the time.

The racial special of jews is undermining and destroying their host society
Lenin wasn't Jewish; he may have had a maternal grandfather who possibly was Jewish. However, it's true Trotsky was a jew from the Ukraine and he was indispensable in bringing the Russian military over to the Bolshevik's side and against the provisional government. He literally founded the Red Army, which is now the Russian Army. Seems you got your Russian communists mixed up.
 
Probably the oddest thing to me is when slavs stan lenin, because he was so massively destructive to slavkind
I feel the USSR is poorly understood even by those who lived in it. You also should contrast the USSR with the other states of the time to get a good sense of what was going on at the time. But this is difficult because the US/Western system is EXTREMELY poorly understood.

For example the USSR was murderous and totalitarian but it extremely capable at war both in the field but also in production. A large chunk of this war has been fought with old Soviet equipment and munitions. Russia has had trouble destroying the Ukrainian power grid even though it is extremely poorly maintained because the USSR built it so well.

I would also make the argument that some kind of leftist political system was going to be in power for any country in the 20th century. Whether it was fascism or liberalism or communism some kind of government would emerge that would urbanize and serve the masses. It remains to be seen which system has done the least amount of damage to the countries that followed it. I'd say that Soviet style communism has done less damage to Russia than Liberalism has done to the US.
 
I'd say that Soviet style communism has done less damage to Russia than Liberalism has done to the US.
Soviet-style Communism took a country barely two steps out of the Renaissance and turned it into a global superpower capable of historic feats of engineering, science, industry, and warfare in less than 40 years.

Liberalism, meanwhile, has destroyed a country that once put men on the moon and had an industrial and scientific base unprecedented in human history, and it did so in also less than 40 years.

Give me the Soviet Union over Clownworld.
 
I feel the USSR is poorly understood even by those who lived in it. You also should contrast the USSR with the other states of the time to get a good sense of what was going on at the time. But this is difficult because the US/Western system is EXTREMELY poorly understood.

For example the USSR was murderous and totalitarian but it extremely capable at war both in the field but also in production. A large chunk of this war has been fought with old Soviet equipment and munitions. Russia has had trouble destroying the Ukrainian power grid even though it is extremely poorly maintained because the USSR built it so well.

I would also make the argument that some kind of leftist political system was going to be in power for any country in the 20th century. Whether it was fascism or liberalism or communism some kind of government would emerge that would urbanize and serve the masses. It remains to be seen which system has done the least amount of damage to the countries that followed it. I'd say that Soviet style communism has done less damage to Russia than Liberalism has done to the US.
Soviet style communism made Russia strong as people. Liberalism has made america weaker as people.

Ultimately, a country is a reflection of its people. Destroy its people and you destroy the nation.
 
I'd say that Soviet style communism has done less damage to Russia than Liberalism has done to the US.
It has done a real large amounts of damage to the agrarian parts of the country thou, limiting the amount of land one can own initially, and overtaxation in produce over the entire lifespan of the union, especially during 5 year plans.
Cause holodomor wasnt a national issue to be dicks to ukrainians, it was systematic issue that affected everyone in the agrarian sector. So, not really? A lot of people had no choice but to starve, and those who had an opportunity to leave for rapidly industrializing towns were basically left to break their backs for scraps that your goverment has stolen from your mom.
this is also why everything was built robust, to last, and easy to use, main workforce for a really long while were villagemen with not much for education.
 
More like it came with a big check attached. I don't think the UK was ever in danger of invasion from the USA.
Not quite, but there's a reason that the Israelis saw fit to launch airstrikes on American ships. America was seen as a "two-faced nation of cowards" for good reason by all parties present.

I earned two university degrees.
This is an extremely bizarre statement to make and it's like you don't see it.
 
America was seen as a "two-faced nation of cowards" for good reason by all parties
If you have to reach all the way back to 1967 to bring up Israel, a country we are aware the US (and UK) bends over backwards for, to claim the US somehow forced the UK to go full retard over niggers and jews, while you conveniently gloss over Victoria getting wet at the sight of her heeb PM as well as your WW2 bong women that whored themselves out to black American GIs, complaining when MPs tried to stop it, you really need to read a decent history book.
This is an extremely bizarre statement to make and it's like you don't see it.
Higher education confuses the sub 80 IQ retards, it seems.
 
this is also why everything was built robust, to last, and easy to use, main workforce for a really long while were villagemen with not much for education
Things were also built rebust because it was intended that people would not have to replace their stuff, and it was worth it to spend the extra little to overengineer things. In America things are built as cheaply as possible so that they last only as long as consumers consider respectable, then they have to buy a new one. Companies have added so much complexity to parts just to shave a dollar off the manufacturing costs. My partner has an old mixer that is solid cast iron and will last forever, but most people have a flimsy plastic one that wears out during use.

If global supply chains collapse then places like Russia would still have their overbuilt products that will last decades with some care and maintenance, but I'd say 50-90% of products owned by Americans would need to be replaced in 5 years or so, with few replacements available.

And I believe most products in Russia use metal parts or such that you could get a local machine shop to make a serviceable replacement from scratch, but America would not have any local capability to make replacement parts
 
I bet Biden hoping Zelensky goes on a live anti-Israel rant to justify cutting off Ukraine aid.
I wish that to actually happen.
BUT.
1706526696958.png
You expect a man who wears this thing like this to actually do something adequate\wise\likable? Please...
 
Higher education confuses the sub 80 IQ retards, it seems.
"I can remember events which happened over a century ago!"

"Huh?"

"HAH. I have two University degrees!" (conspicuously not mentioning which)

This was then followed by black cock.

The exact subject is "how Europe got into this situation" and it was because the USA ran around supporting everyone who would attack French and British interests, throwing Israel under the bus in the process. France and Britain could barely afford to fight back, having fought for ten years each in the World Wars.

American "success" is built off of, as that guy mentioned earlier in the thread, "cannibalising" the Europeans.
having good quality long lasting cheap vehicles would be a game changer for so many people.
Tesla automotive is disturbing as hell for this exact same reason.

Electric vehicles as a luxury - despite their low running costs. It's like with caviar, or lobster; the whole concept of value is upside-down.
 
Back