- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Cultcow Mikemikev / Michael Coombs / Twinkle Toes / Velcro Pants - Pedo Teacher and Neo-Nazi, Advocate of Child Murder, Secret JewMuslim ANTIFA, A-Logs Null Constantly
- Thread starter chimpburgers
- Start date
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
banal
bəˈnɑːl,-ˈnal/
adjective
- so lacking in originality as to be obvious and boring.
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
Not primarily. It's actually normal for a man to feel some kind of attraction to women near the age of consent. Of course I'm wasting my time trying to be sincere with a forum of scumbag assholes.
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2016
Mike you're posting lies again. Look at the geographic distance versus genetic distance figures in Tishkoff et al 2009:
"We observe a linear correlation between geographic and genetic distance as expected under an isolation by
distance model. The largest correlations (Spearman ρ) were observed in Europe (ρ= 0.83), the Middle East (ρ= 0.8
and in Africa(ρ= 0.40) (Table S5); The largest [African] correlations (Spearman ρ) were observed in Saharan Africa (ρ= 0.76) and the smallest in
East Africa (ρ= 0.19)."
Similarly Handley et al 2007 found: "clusters explain only a minute fraction of the variance relative to clines. As mentioned in the main text (Figure 1b), >75% of
the total variance of pairwise FST can be captured by geographic distance alone. Adding information on genetic clusters to this model
captures only an extra <2% of the variance." http://www2.zoo.cam.ac.uk/manica/ms/2007_Handley_et_al_TIG.pdf
These results fit a clinal, not clustered model of human variation. While clusters exist they are not found between continents, but inside them.
As usual you ignore the science data for your own political bias. This is why you end up banned on every science forum you post on.
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
Mike you're posting lies again. Look at the geographic distance versus genetic distance figures in Tishkoff et al 2009:
"We observe a linear correlation between geographic and genetic distance as expected under an isolation by
distance model. The largest correlations (Spearman ρ) were observed in Europe (ρ= 0.83), the Middle East (ρ= 0.8
(ρ= 0.40) (Table S5); The largest [African] correlations (Spearman ρ) were observed in Saharan Africa (ρ= 0.76) and the smallest in
East Africa (ρ= 0.19)."
Similarly Handley et al 2007 found: "clusters explain only a minute fraction of the variance relative to clines. As mentioned in the main text (Figure 1b), >75% of
the total variance of pairwise FST can be captured by geographic distance alone. Adding information on genetic clusters to this model
captures only an extra <2% of the variance." http://www2.zoo.cam.ac.uk/manica/ms/2007_Handley_et_al_TIG.pdf
These results fit a clinal, not clustered model of human variation. While clusters exist they are not found between continents, but inside them.
As usual you ignore the science data for your own political bias. This is why you end up banned on every science forum you post on.
Handley used a geographic model which includes "choke points" or geographic barriers. Yet these are exactly why we have races.
Geographic distance between populations The first step for a geographically explicit analysis is to establish the distances between populations. The simplest approach is to consider the great circle distance between two locations, which is the distance over the shortest, most direct route on a sphere (i.e. ‘as the crow flies’). However, in most instances, it is desirable to take into account barriers, such as oceans or mountain ranges, which prevent the free flow of individuals (and thus genes). If clear ‘choke points’ are present (such as the Suez and Bering straits for movement from Africa to Asia and from Asia to America, respectively), it is possible to simply force any movement between regions through them but allow completely free movement within the regions by using great circle distances [10,17]. A more sophisticated approach that enables addition of more complex barriers is to build up explicit friction matrices that describe how difficult it is to move from one location to another. For small- scale movement, friction matrices can be computed over projected maps (e.g. using the software PATHMATRIX [26]), but for large-scale movement the distortion is far too great, and distances computed onto a spherical referential are far superior [12,24]. The latter approach has been used to model human migrations across the whole globe, forcing movement to occur only on land with an altitude less than 2000 m [11] (Figure Ia).
Your source seems rather old and I doubt its accuracy. Look at this from 2015
http://www.nature.com/articles/srep09500
PC 1 captures 7% of the variance between South Asia and East Asia, if you drop admixed Uyghurs etc. And that's the key point. Samples have to be weighted by population size. Handley isn't doing this.
Further looking at IBD is looking at neutral variation. Looking at selected variation we get this.
http://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1000500
And the really key point is that even if human variation was a perfect continuum in one dimension, which it isn't at all, we could still divide it in order to talk about it.
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
H
HG 400
Guest
kiwifarms.net
Non-white Armenoid phenotypes like Mike are genetically predisposed to pedophilia.
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
No I end up banned (like Watson) because even "scientists" tend to be a bunch of cowardly PC faggots. They just pretend they "have no evidence" of racial differences while they discuss "populations".
LMAO. You spend all of your time here waiting to repeat your kindergarten insults? How embarrassing.
Last edited by a moderator:
H
HG 400
Guest
kiwifarms.net
You have a very caucasian maxilla what's your racial background?
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
your chin ideally should be square and broad in a male, a round chin is acceptable however not the most photogenic. A pointed chin is highly feminine and while not necessarily a sexual death sentence or even suspicious, would need to be redeemed by other masculine features.
A bum chin is okay if its not too deep, if it starts to create wrinkles or you cant shave the hair there it should be filled, a line is much more acceptable than a circle.
A scrotum chin is when it seemingly hangs off the jaw line, it can be corrected through:
1 piece jaw and chin wrap around implants and some lipo and filler.
Sometimes a chin reduction AND implant is also required.
Chin widening Osteotomy by a maxillofacial surgeon.
Another thing leading to an amorphous appearance is an upside down smiley below the lower lip, this can be corrected with filler.
Goushy_Foudz
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2016
José Mourinho
The Special One
Forum Staff
Retired Staff
Global Moderator
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
H
HG 400
Guest
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2014
It's no secret that you have the brain of one, given that you spend too much time jacking it to your private folder.
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2015
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
lol look at this pedo @Mikemikev trollshielding in the oliver smith thread. look you pedo nothing changes all because you are shitting on a lolcow lower than you
@Oliver D Smith (Pedophile) you should make fun of @Mikemikev in his lolcow thread
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2016
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2015
id say my most defining quality is that i instinctively write tremendous amounts of think pieces whenever i see a naked person