Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%

  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%

  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%

  • Next Year

    Votes: 154 33.3%

  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%
  • Total voters
    462
Your Starter for 10 said:
Countdown to the magistrate giving him another 30 days with no repercussions starts now.
Click to expand...
He's still on the clock to respond the Defendants Rule 19 Joinder demand, motion for change of venue, Motion to Strike, and Motion for more definitive statement. At a minimum the magistrate will give him until that assignment is due in class I think, if Russ is lucky. More likely though the Magistrate is going to order a teleconference hearing to order the schedule and require Russel to appear. Which will be glorious because Shit Lips will have to talk on the record with Hardin.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Broken Cuddles, Clovis, DSP's Tax Lawyer and 6 others
mindlessobserver said:
He's still on the clock to respond the Defendants Rule 19 Joinder demand, motion for change of venue, Motion to Strike, and Motion for more definitive statement. At a minimum the magistrate will give him until that assignment is due in class I think, if Russ is lucky. More likely though the Magistrate is going to order a teleconference hearing to order the schedule and require Russel to appear. Which will be glorious because Shit Lips will have to talk on the record with Hardin.
Click to expand...
I really hope if such a conference happens, he uses a laptop's integrated webcam and mic/speakers.

That way everyone can both hear AND see when he's furiously typing to research on the fly as he argues with a real lawyer. :story:
 
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Broken Cuddles, rubytintedchix, CEO of Gay and 13 others
AnOminous said:
Everyone will have to listen to him slurping and drooling.
Click to expand...
That sound would be like a Down Syndrome man taking excessive amount of crystal meth and booze. Funnily enough that it would be my interprentation of Shitlips talking and justifying in court against Papa Jersh. Just being a porn-addicted sex pest that has little-to-no basic education and "blissful" ignorance really made him more skitzo and hungry for cash to get bitches.
I would gladly take a bag of popcorn to see the LOLsuit commence.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Agree
Reactions: Himedall All-seeing Waifu and Not a bee
Null announced that he would appeal his 10th Circuit loss to the Supreme Court of the United States. By my read he has until March 3rd to do so
Screenshot 2024-02-02 170929.png
 
  • Informative
  • Winner
  • Like
Reactions: jerkstore, ConSluttant, Aiōn and 27 others
Useful_Mistake said:
View attachment 5687735
View attachment 5687741
View attachment 5687746
View attachment 5687754
View attachment 5687762
View attachment 5687772
View attachment 5687763
Click to expand...
So without semi competent legal council classic Russ is back. I'm not a lawyer but "Sorry your honor I was to busy reading emails and reporting them to actually read your rulings. I'll get to it when I can but in the meantime make these dang dirty kiwi farmers stop emailing me!" isn't going to hold up in court.
Edit to add: if the person emailing Russ actually is a farmer, knock that shit off. That makes you as retarded as Russ.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Feels
Reactions: jerkstore, MidZeRo, Aiōn and 27 others
Useful_Mistake said:
Null announced that he would appeal his 10th Circuit loss to the Supreme Court of the United States. By my read he has until March 3rd to do so
View attachment 5687584
Click to expand...
It's probably a better idea than suing Epik. I mean I'm not seeing it go anywhere, but it isn't like SCOTUS doesn't sometimes take up some really ridiculous IP case and it's about time they smack around a Circuit other than the Ninth or the Federal Circuit's dumb patent cases.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: ConSluttant, SpiceyHuman, Botchy Galoop and 14 others
AnOminous said:
It's probably a better idea than suing Epik. I mean I'm not seeing it go anywhere, but it isn't like SCOTUS doesn't sometimes take up some really ridiculous IP case and it's about time they smack around a Circuit other than the Ninth or the Federal Circuit's dumb patent cases.
Click to expand...
Even if it completely fails to even be heard, it means there's a chance, however slim, that Thomas goes in search of Kiwi Farms.
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • Winner
Reactions: ConSluttant, Marsh Rabbit, Al from Dadeville and 13 others
AnOminous said:
It's probably a better idea than suing Epik. I mean I'm not seeing it go anywhere, but it isn't like SCOTUS doesn't sometimes take up some really ridiculous IP case and it's about time they smack around a Circuit other than the Ninth or the Federal Circuit's dumb patent cases.
Click to expand...
Disagree completely. Appealing to the SC is a waste of money and just gives enemies a little victory swelling around their am-holes when it gets denied cert.

Suing Epik, even if I goes as poorly as I expect, will still force some degenerates and their counsels into the sunlight for a minute. Which is always useful.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: Marsh Rabbit, Tacky Old Broad, Pedophobe and 7 others
Your Starter for 10 said:
Disagree completely. Appealing to the SC is a waste of money and just gives enemies a little victory swelling around their am-holes when it gets denied cert.
Click to expand...
I don't really care about retards and their tard seizures. A cert. denial isn't even a loss and doesn't take up much time. But even a loss after a granted cert. is a part of history.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: ConSluttant, Al from Dadeville, TheOtherSideofMakeBelieve and 10 others
How many times are judges going to pikachuface when fuckface makes a mockery of their court, like he does with literally everything, for the billionth time?

Do judges really have to give the benefit of the doubt every. Single. Time. For the “too retarded to follow basic instructions” for every event in court?

A shrewd judge wouldn’t see this as “oh I underestimated how naive he is, I should let him have months to fuck around and waste all of our time” but rather “this bitch is spitting in the face of the court and has never had consequences”
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Broken Cuddles, jerkstore, TheOtherSideofMakeBelieve and 10 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back