Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[mindlessobserver]

And the he STILL sued the Bunny Ranch and lost! Probably isn't a good idea to say in your lawsuit that you already accepted restitution of 3 times what you felt you were owed, but are still suing the girl personally just for revenge

Hey, at least he was honest. I am sure thr judge was very impressed with what a good boy Greer was.

 

[ScooterL]

he sued (or at least threatened to sue) and got a partial refund which he then used to inflict himself upon three other poor victims

Press X. The only source for this story is Russell's forged "letter from Hof".

 

[Debbie Macomber]

You just know in Russ's next brief he's gonna say "I'm totally not throwing out unrelated accusations to prejudice the court, and by the way, KIWIFARMS WAS ORDERED TO BE TAKEN OFF THE INTERNET FOR CHILD PORN!!! Here's the tweet!!!"

 

[Your Starter for 10]

You just know in Russ's next brief he's gonna say "I'm totally not throwing out unrelated accusations to prejudice the court, and by the way, KIWIFARMS WAS ORDERED TO BE TAKEN OFF THE INTERNET FOR CHILD PORN!!! Here's the tweet!!!"

That'd actually be good for Null if he winds up suing Epik.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Tldr: Russ refuses to comply with Court Orders because he reads them differently than Mr. Hardin:


Russ lies about Mediation (reminder, during the time Russ had counsel, Skordas was in play, not Mr. Hardin)


Docket 75 is a copy of docket 74

 

[AnOminous]

Russ lies about Mediation (reminder, during the time Russ had counsel, Skordas was in play, not Mr. Hardin)

And to jog everyone's memory, ECF 60 told Russhole this:

You're in big boy court now, faggot, do your shit.

 

[Vect]

Greer really is mentally stunted enough to think that if he puts his fingers in his ears and pretends nobody's home, the horrible people trying to make him to follow through on his own lawsuit will go away.

 

[Your Starter for 10]

Countdown to the magistrate giving him another 30 days with no repercussions starts now.

 

[Jotch]

He still has a month, I believe in my boy Руссэл Гриир

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Tldr: Russ refuses to comply with Court Orders because he reads them differently than Mr. Hardin:

"I want to explaaaaaaain! Why won't you let me explaaaaaaaain??"
"Okay then, pick a day to explain your side."
".....I caaaaaaaaan't."

 

[DrJonesHat]

He's the dog who caught the car. He doesn't know what to do now that the suit is proceeding. He was probably expecting null to fold as soon as the suit was reinstated.

 

[Null]

He was probably expecting null to fold as soon as the suit was reinstated.

Correct. Very happy to continue fighting this for the next 2, 3, 4 years? Maybe we'll see an end to it in 2026.

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

He's the dog who caught the car. He doesn't know what to do now that the suit is proceeding. He was probably expecting null to fold as soon as the suit was reinstated.

Just imagine if it actually goes to trial.

 

[AnimeGirlConnoisseur]

Just imagine if it actually goes to trial.

I was going to give this an optimistic sticker, but I don't know if I would actually want to see that. I mean, I would love to see it, I just wouldn't want Null (and to a lesser extent the American taxpayer) to have to pay for it.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

He still has a month

He does not. He had 14 days from the (Null’s) reply to his answer. That deadline was for yesterday, hence this filing.

 

[Pee Cola]

An unintentionally hilarious typo from our boy Matty in docket 75:

 

[AnOminous]

He does not. He had 14 days from the (Null’s) reply to his answer. That deadline was for yesterday, hence this filing.

Let's watch him get tard indulgences yet again because he tried, he just needs to EXPLAIN.

 

[waffle]

I think that what Hardin is getting at on the book/song thing is that it is improper to unite two claims of contributory infringement in one count, and his petition only lists one count.

 

[Jotch]

View attachment 5657455
View attachment 5657459

He does not.

What's this then? What did I miss?

 

[Useful_Mistake]

What's this then? What did I miss?

That is docket-order 73 deadlines regarding Russ’ answers to Hardin’s motions which is separate from docket-order 60 regarding scheduling deadlines. He is not yet in breach of response deadlines, but he is in breach of scheduling deadlines