- Joined
- Dec 3, 2013
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
223 seems rather low for a big budget AAA game, gotta say.Steam reviews seem to be positive
View attachment 5688320
Ordinarily I would say it's lame. Even the JL pastiche from The Boys is called "the Seven" -- seven is the correct number. And I would speculate Rocksteady cut down the rosters as a cost-saving measure. But Aquaman has suffered enough, he doesn't need this, so it's a blessing in this case.Nerd time on superhero meta: Outside of everything else... what do people think of the Justice League being only the five members of Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Flash, and Green Lantern (I know it's John but still).
The audio logs explain that the league ended up brainwashed because Superman was stupid enough to try negotiating with a giant skull-shaped deathship, rather than heed Batman's warning that it might possibly be a trap maybe. They turned Batman into Injustice Superman (i.e., a psychopathic failed ex-hero) so the other cishetero male heroes were demoted another notch below him accordingly. If WB had demanded a JL game, CY-Rocksteady just would have fucked it up some other way. So it's probably just as well they fucked it up in every way possible, makes it funnier.I get that its suppose to add to the tragedy of killing them but watching this just makes you wish we got a Superman game or a J.L game instead.
Ordinarily I would say it's lame. Even the JL pastiche from The Boys is called "the Seven" -- seven is the correct number. And I would speculate Rocksteady cut down the rosters as a cost-saving measure. But Aquaman has suffered enough, he doesn't need this, so it's a blessing in this case.
The audio logs explain that the league ended up brainwashed because Superman was stupid enough to try negotiating with a giant skull-shaped deathship, rather than heed Batman's warning that it might possibly be a trap maybe. They turned Batman into Injustice Superman (i.e., a psychopathic failed ex-hero) so the other cishetero male heroes were demoted another notch below him accordingly. If WB had demanded a JL game, CY-Rocksteady just would have fucked it up some other way. So it's probably just as well they fucked it up in every way possible, makes it funnier.
It’s ok, in a cutscene before the fight they would have found anti-water bullets so they could shoot aquaman until he dies and then make some kind of marvel quip on his corpse.We all know Aquaman would be a joke boss in this because people still think that the Aquaman jokes are still funny and original after being repeated so many times for what are decades by this point.
If he was mentally controlled by Brainiac, the S.S would be probably more fucked than with Superman. How? Oh look, there is a massive tidal wave that dwarfs buildings on our way...and inside the wave there are aquatic massive beasts. I want to see their bullets stopping that.
This lazy fatass used to make scripted videos. Now he just parrots what everybody else has already said days later on Xitter.Since we mentioned Mauler earlier, his final thoughts on the game.
View attachment 5688220View attachment 5688221View attachment 5688223View attachment 5688224View attachment 5688225
Steam is a bit weird about this and I think it's because not everyone who uses it is necessarily up to snuff on the political drama surrounding products like this. Hopefully a few days playing and discovering its broken aspects will lead to more negative reviews.Steam reviews seem to be positive
View attachment 5688320
Well the Flash literally rips Lex Luthor’s heart out but somehow doesn’t do that to any of the Suicide Squad but instead runs around and throws slow moving tornados so I imagine Aquaman will fly menacingly through the air and charge up a big wave until you hit him with counter, at which point he will float there awkwardly while your shoot him with bullets.If he was mentally controlled by Brainiac, the S.S would be probably more fucked than with Superman. How? Oh look, there is a massive tidal wave that dwarfs buildings on our way...and inside the wave there are aquatic massive beasts. I want to see their bullets stopping that.
Plot armor is thick.Well the Flash literally rips Lex Luthor’s heart out but somehow doesn’t do that to any of the Suicide Squad but instead runs around and throws slow moving tornados so I imagine Aquaman will fly menacingly through the air and charge up a big wave until you hit him with counter, at which point he will float there awkwardly while your shoot him with bullets.
And then Deadshot will say that it was a good thing they found that ‘dehydrated water’ tech and Boomerang will try to cut off his finger and Waller will yell at them to ‘cut the shit’. Because we can’t say “fuck” in an M rated game.
Lot of those are bot shilling or people acknowledging its shit but making excuses. Lot of casuals.Steam reviews seem to be positive
View attachment 5688320
It's money. People and bots are being paid to promote it. Really is that simple. There are diehards but they are far and few between. The bot army on twitter has been transparently obvious.What's the deal with termites coming out to defend Suicide Squad all the time? It was the same way with the original movie despite how awful it obviously was. Then all these people mysteriously disappear when the new Suicide Squad movie comes out because they memory hole the last one.
Really strikes me as the current year mindset. The NPCs defend X but quickly forget about it and rush to defend something else. They have zero investment in these franchises.
i don't understand by what metric it can be a 7. What are your standards? What is your rating scale? What does a 7 mean to you? If you asked most people, a 6/7 would mean above average/good.
Sunk cost fallacy. One of the biggest humiliations is admitting that something you spent money on is complete garbage, and there are precisely 22 positive reviews (out of 813 positives at the time of writing) that sit below 2 hours of playtime, aka "can't refund" zone. The rest are like this:Steam reviews seem to be positive
View attachment 5688320
With the popularity of The Boys, Invincible, Injustice, and other attempts to turn Superman into a bad guy, the trend just continues.I'm fascinated with the idea of why this game came to be.
There had to be a point where they realized they were in deep shit but they spent too much time and money to just give up, right?
Just in the past three years we saw Avengers shit the bed, then the DC films completely fall apart, and then general Super Hero fatigue with Marvel shit starting to lose steam and fall apart.
Did they honestly think that this game was going to be *the* next big thing? Did they actually think it would take off or even be profitable?
How many games need to just completely fail before these companies start to realize they need to scale shit back? I'm sorry, most games should not take 8 years to develop, especially if you reach a point around year 3 where you realize you have a complete stinker on your hands but you've thrown too much into it to just cancel it or start over, right?
Yeah I thought they'd kill off some low level members and 1 of the original 7 so that way they could sequel bait. For me it was partly optimism in terms of the studio respecting the source material and partly thinking Rocksteady were going to milk the franchise instead of doing anything "daring". I'm still confused as to why this needed to be in the same universe as Arkham if they weren't planning spin-offs but I should've known better than to expect them to respect any of the original 7, except of course Wonder Woman because muh feminism. In my defense the idea of this particular group of villains killing Superman and Green Lantern seemed farfetched to anyone who has opened a comic or even has cursory knowledge of how OP those characters are.Time to go to the start of the thread and look at some takes that aged like milk.
I've always just seen it as people treating the scale as starting at 5, at least when it comes to shit AAAs make. It's absurd, but that's what it is. A 7.5/10 might as well be a "5/10, it's okay I guess." If anything actually gets a 5 or 6, it means it's truly fucked up somewhere (or the publisher's check bounced.)don't understand by what metric it can be a 7. What are your standards? What is your rating scale? What does a 7 mean to you? If you asked most people, a 6/7 would mean above average/good.
What's the point of even giving a game a rating if everything below an 8 is just bad and not worth playing.