Crime Pro-life activists face up to 11 years in prison after conviction over prayer vigil outside abortion clinic - Video footage of the protest shows the group praying and singing Christian hymns in the hallway outside the clinic's doors.

face.png

Six pro-life activists face up to 11 years in prison after a Nashville jury found them guilty on Tuesday of conspiracy and violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act over their peaceful protest outside of an abortion clinic in March 2021.

The charges were brought by President Joe Biden's Department of Justice.

The six defendants are Chet Gallagher, Coleman Boyd, Heather Idoni, Cal Zastrow, Dennis Green, and Paul Vaughn. They are accused in the charging documents of using social media to organize a blockade at the entrance of an abortion clinic in Mount Juliet.

Video footage of the protest shows the group peacefully praying and singing Christian hymns in the hallway outside the clinic's doors.

The defendants were later targeted and arrested by the FBI for "conspiracy against rights secured by the FACE Act, and committing FACE Act violations."

The Justice Department issued a release in Oct. 2022 that states: "Gallagher utilized social media to promote a series of anti-abortion events scheduled for March 4-7, 2021, in the Nashville area. Other co-conspirators then utilized Facebook to coordinate travel and logistics and to identify other participants for the blockade."

"In his social media post, Gallagher referred to the blockade as a 'rescue,'" the release states. "Boyd also began a Facebook livestream broadcast of the clinic blockade at 7:45 a.m. on March 5, 2021. This livestream broadcast was titled, in part, 'Mt. Juliet, TN Rescue March 5, 2021,' and livestreamed the blockade event as his co-conspirators and others blocked the clinic’s entry doors and prevented a patient and an employee from entering."

"The livestream also broadcast members of the group attempting to engage a patient and her companion as Boyd told his livestream audience that the patient was a 'mom coming to kill her baby,'" according to the release.

Video footage obtained by the Daily Signal shows FBI agents arriving at the home of defendant Paul Vaughn. Federal authorities placed him in handcuffs and took him into custody.

Vaughn told the outlet that the FBI arrived at his home with "guns pointed at the door, banging on the house, yelling and screaming, ‘Open up. FBI,’ that kind of thing. When I opened the door and saw the guns pointed at me, I asked them what they wanted, who they were looking for, and they said they wanted me."

"I had kids in the yard walking out to get in the car to go to school, I was about to take them to school, and other kids in the house," he said. "So, seeing that the easiest path to de-escalation was me in handcuffs, I stepped outside and put an end to the ranting and the banging and the yelling."

Vaughn was represented by Thomas More Society attorneys in March, who argued that the Department of Justice under President Biden has exhibited a consistent tendency to selectively enforce the FACE Act against individuals who are pro-life.

Vaughn's attorneys petitioned the court to vacate the indictment levied by the DOJ on the grounds of selective prosecution. They contended that the FACE Act, which regulates speech based on content and violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act and the free exercise clause of the First Amendment, is an unconstitutional regulation.

"Defendants submit that the government has engaged in selective and/or vindictive prosecution motivated by an intent to punish defendants for the content of their viewpoints and their protected expressions thus making this case an unconstitutional application of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act," the filing states, according to the Daily Signal.

"In addition, FACE is an unconstitutional content-based regulation of speech; as applied, it violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, as well as the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment; and this court lacks jurisdiction because, especially after the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, FACE is an invalid exercise of Congress’ Commerce Clause authority," it continues.

Furthermore, the court filing adds that the Justice Department arrested Vaughn "and ten other defendants into court for a single alleged nonviolent violation" of the FACE Act “with over 170 uncharged incidents of destruction and vandalism at pro-life centers and churches across the country."

"The DOJ has demonstrated clear and illegal hostility toward the pro-life viewpoint in its statements and enforcement decisions, running roughshod over fundamental religious freedoms and free speech rights, and bringing an illegal selective prosecution here,” the filing alleges.

Article Link

Archive
 
peaceful prayer in front of a church is not harassment legally or even colloquially.
Even when they're blocking off the building?
Personalky, I don't care all that much since it's you who is making bad ddcisions
You think I had an abortion bc I'm pro-choice?
Well I mean the government does that already with taxes and gun control and social security...
I say no restrictions on guns and abortions.
Which is nothing compared to how many attacks on women's clinics have happened. Especially since attacks with fatalities have occurred.
Yeah, there was even a doctor murdered in church for offering third term abortions for the most dire cases like incest, fetal anomaly etc. Dr. Tiller.
Do the frumpy lesbians on the site just refresh the articles page until an abortion story pops up? Sad if true.
I'm not a lesbian, I'm straight. In the real world, most women have some kind of opinion on abortion.
boy, thats a really smart and well thought out ideology
Okay mister creationist.
there are no unwanted pregnancies, YOU had sex.
Birth control can fail. plus this is a double standard. Women have to accept having a baby as an inevitable consequence of sex according to your standard but men who don't want one are called babytrapped. So the woman is painted as a whore but the man an innocent lil bean victim.
leftists and meth, holy shit
You're one to speak as a literal schizophrenic conspiracy theorist.
what I find indefensible is the pro choice side's notion that, outside of rape, there are unforseen pregnancies that somehow just happen to you with no advance warning.
That is a strawman. People know where they come from but you can't make someone want a pregnancy.
10 year olds dont naturally menstruate.
I started my period at 11, 10 yr olds getting a period isn't unheard of.
Speech is a right, even speech you don't like.
Yes, but not when they are physically blocking and trying to intimate people getting healthcare. They're free to do it somewhere else.
 
Even when they're blocking off the building?
Depends. Are they blocking traffic for normal people and non patrons? If so, fuck em. Jail em for a month and fine them. Oh wait...what the fuck?

11 years though in prison for protesting abortion? You do know that's more than what 90% of pedophiles get, right?
 
Okay mister creationist.
is your implication that creationism is not smart? follow the science, comrade

plus this is a double standard.
well, since men and women are different, they have different standards applied to them. but thats neither here nor there
So the woman is painted as a whore
right. because theyre being whores. women control sexual politics and as such, their sexual value is in chastity and/or fertility. if youre sleeping around, you are not valuable, sexually.

You're one to speak as a literal schizophrenic conspiracy theorist.
nigger, i have never come out in support of any conspiracy theory, in fact, most of my time on this forum is calling conspracy theorist (like android raptor) faggots OR sometimes just debunking them altogether. this is just low effort accusations on your part
 
Depends. Are they blocking traffic for normal people and non patrons? If so, fuck em. Jail em for a month and fine them. Oh wait...what the fuck?

11 years though in prison for protesting abortion? You do know that's more than what 90% of pedophiles get, right?
Pretty much. 11 years is just absurd.
 
Walk around them. If it turns into a physical confrontation, that's no longer speech.
11 years is longer than some people get for murder. No. Fuck the DA, fuck the judge. Fuck the jury. Lynch them all.

I'd love to see all the personal cell phones of the jury by the way. Something tells me that their dms, bank account records, and phone call history all tell a VERY interesting story.
 
Are they blocking traffic for normal people and non patrons?
I meant the patients. They're blocking off access to healthcare, it's the same as BLM blocking EMS and just as bad.
is your implication that creationism is not smart?
That's right, it's retarded.
nigger, i have never come out in support of any conspiracy theory
Really? Why do you claim that humans used to breed with animals and there were animal-human hybrids walking around? And that the Muslims, Catholics and British Royals control the entire world?
Fuck the jury. Lynch them all.
Take your meds.
 
That's right, it's retarded.
not according to evidence.
Really? Why do you claim that humans used to breed with animals and there were animal-human hybrids walking around? And that the Muslims, Catholics and British Royals control the entire world?
because thats what evidence and history show

I hope so but there are creepy weirdoes out there who seriously think children are no longer children when they start menstruating. It's not an uncommon thing you see pedophiles insisting actually.
man...what is with you people exposing YOURSELVES. its like getting caught is part of the fetish.
 
Good. I'm all for their right to protest but they shouldn't be physically obstructing entrances and harassing people entering sexual health clinics. There should be a bubble zone around clinics where protesters can't go.

Are you willing to extend that to "protesters shouldn't harass and obstruct people just trying to go about their business" as a general statement, or are you a hypocrite?
 
Back