Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.7%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 55 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 16.0%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 152 33.3%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 109 23.9%

  • Total voters
    456
A lot of corps fight every claim to the bloody end because it is absolutely idiotic to advertise yourself as an open money bag.
Coca-Cola especially has the reputation of spending hundreds of thousands of dollars to fight a frivolous claim before they'll pay a dime just to avoid being seen as an open wallet any moron can sue and get money. Google does that too. Also, Google will drag out everything you've ever done online and put it in the worst possible light. You might win the suit, but your reputation will be in tatters and most likely you're now unemployable.
 
You might win the suit, but your reputation will be in tatters and most likely you're now unemployable.
Most companies can't do that specific Google thing where they know everything about you and every search you ever made. Unless you are a fucking saint you have searched for some weird shit you would not want to answer for on the stand. Google is wise to take that shit to the limit. You can hate Google, but you should definitely be afraid of them too.
 
Or in the case of Acerthorn are left with a restriction on filing copyright cases
Wereturkeys are immune to shaming attempts, so all that's left is restrictions on their legal shenanigans.

He won't be able to figure out how to serve them. Their receptionists will keep cock-blocking him.
He served Freemantle because they had a publicly posted Address for Service. I suspect Google does as well. He can serve them, but he'd be utterly annihilated once they responded.
 
Last edited:
You wanna know what's really sad?

Russell's parents paid for his lawyer in the Erika case, showing they do care about him and will protect him, but they didn't pay for representation in any of his frivolous lawsuits.

Therefore, Russ's own parents must think the farms aren't really harassing him and this is another frivolous lawsuit. Russell's own parents think kiwifamrs is in the right
 
Russell spotted at the airport


 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
Reactions: StinkySnack
He won't be able to figure out how to serve them. Their receptionists will keep cock-blocking him.
Ironically it's Jersh who's pleading them in.
He should include them because Google should be necessary party given that the complaints arise in part from files on their Google Disk
Imagine the level of madness where deliberately dragging Google into a lawsuit is actually the right move.
 
Another reason it might be against Null's best interests to strike all the irrelevant shit is it's extremely prejudicial TO RUSS!

Don't forget one of his big arguments was "They say victims with an s implying I have many victims when I only have one." and trying to justify why he has a stalking conviction "when Plaintiff wasn't contacting her all that much" and the ever infamous "It could be argued kiwifarms has done more to stalk and harass me than I ever did Erika but somehow I'm the convicted one!"

All this poisons the court's image of opinion worse than anything Hardin could say.

Then again, Russ will probably still drudge out all his plights even if they're stricken, and still argue about "but somehow I'm the convicted one!"
 
Don't forget one of his big arguments was "They say victims with an s implying I have many victims when I only have one." and trying to justify why he has a stalking conviction "when Plaintiff wasn't contacting her all that much" and the ever infamous "It could be argued kiwifarms has done more to stalk and harass me than I ever did Erika but somehow I'm the convicted one!"
And meanwhile he actually DOES have multiple victims, as the AGT guys pointed out in a lengthy filing. This man's entire history is sexual harassment over and over again. He has crimes, he has restraining orders, he is a criminal who stalks women.
 
Before your time, Null had word changing scripts on the site. As an example, if you called someone "Retarded," the script changed the word to "Exceptional." So it is possible.

It still shouldn't be done. Not only should Null not censor discussion of a public figure (Russell Greer), Russ shouldn't get the win; it would set a very bad precedent in court. For example, women wouldn't be able to talk about sexual predators who trawl dating sites.
I dunno, you could come up with some pretty good wordfilters

Russell Greer => Russhole Shitlips
Russell => Ratface
Greer => Magical Star Buddy

Then for maximum lols respond to his request for relief claiming mootness.
It's almost ridiculous to me. Russ has the frivolous litigant chance of a lifetime. He's been told by an appeals court that he actually has at least a ghost of a case. He's been told do what any normal litigant would do and take care of the basics and submit a schedule like every real plaintiff has to do.

And he is choosing to tard out instead.
He's the dog who caught the car. Of course he doesn't know what to do with it now.
 
Hardin still has not responded fr
He may be a bit busy.
sneed7.jpg
 
Back