I would guess the best approach would be to slowly ramp up pressure while changing tactics. If they ramp up too quickly there's a chance that Ukraine will set aside it's infighting temporarily to focus on devising a strategy. If Russia plans it right Ukraine strategy could get deadlocked.
Offer huge cash bribes to leading politicians.
money and a ticket to Argentina under a new name?
I certainly hope it leads to the government she belongs imploding as well. Between the senile president, tranny surgeon general, former luggage-thieving department of energy head, impotent secretary of state, rainbow-tainted military, gay butt sex in senate chambers, and ever-weakening federal authority (see Texas and Florida), it feels like there isn't much more needed to topple that establishment pretty thoroughly.
Not gonna lie, when put together it all sounds like stories about last years of Rome. Better hope Technocrats won't go for power grab when current party system collapses.
I think he's having trouble finding anyone to take the job. If the Nazi element is willing to overthrow the President I doubt they'd hesitate to off a usurping commander.
It might be also a matter of that the only people willing to take the job will either immediately surrender to Russia, or do such a stupid boneheaded move that their remaining forces get destroyed and they are forced to surrender to Russia.
If the nazi batallions do that it would be the funnest thing ever:
You know it's bad when pro-UKR social media are all now saying in unison that Avdiivka was never really that important after all. I'm sure the tens of thousands of conscripts sent there to die will be thrilled to learn this now.
I think it will still be a couple months before khavdikvkhva finally falls. The fortress does seem to have been mortally wounded but I think the opportunity to cause a mass rout already passed.
Will New Zealand ever reaize the hakas are gay as fuck?
Hey, they all said Bahkmut wasn't important after spending months waxing poetically about how Ukraine was valiantly defending it.
This began over a choice between Russia giving Ukraine an interest free loan or getting an interest laden load from the EU, with the promise they would join the EU and NATO, and get all kinds of free shit from the EU even though the free shit wasn't at all what was promised. So they could give the finger to Russia and claim they had it better, Because they were now yuros. Like in the magazines and TV. In 2013.
It's a methodological approach which is something that ukr bros haven't seemed to realize. They often go on about "lol no kyiv, Russia lost. 2022 summer offensive kicked them out of kherson and kharkiv" without realizing that the cities and locations are not relevant to Russia. Russia is instead concerned with the battlefield and the frontlines. It's not about where it's about what is going on, how best does the land offer advantage in battle? Most wars aren't about capturing the enemies capital and getting the warscore to win. It's about deteriorating the enemy and making the conduct of war impractical for the other side. Sure, Russia is using an intensive amount of resources but Russia is not retarded and there is a purpose behind this because Russia knows that when victory is achieved then the win itself will strike deep within the ranks of Washington and Kiev. The conduct of war is launched upon urban "fortress" locations that Ukraine chooses to turn into propaganda capitals and Russia understands that by taking them they're eroding the moral. The fall of Avdeevka will likely see Z-general get kicked out and he'll be blamed for it and then factionalism will exist. Rinse and repeat, cause dissent in the ranks and cause the military to be of no use. Then, when the enemy is not in a position to resist: Then you can push. A house divided cannot survive, and this is what the ukr bros seem to apply to Russia but are ignorant to how it is being applied on the battlefield.
