Culture A ‘failure to launch’: Why young people are having less sex - For what researchers say is an array of reasons millennials and now Gen Zers are having less sex, with fewer partners, than their parents’ and grandparents.

tree.png
(Patrick Hruby / Los Angeles Times)

Vivian Rhodes figured she would eventually have sex.

She was raised in a Christian household in Washington state and thought sex before marriage would be the ultimate rebellion. But then college came and went — and no sex. Even flirting “felt unnatural,” she said.

In her early 20s, she watched someone she followed on Tumblr come out as asexual and realized that’s how she felt: She had yet to develop romantic feelings for anyone, and the physical act of sex just didn’t sound appealing.

“Some people assume this is about shaming other people, and it’s not,” said Rhodes, 28, who works as a certified nursing assistant in Los Angeles. “I’m glad people have fun with it and it works for them. But I think sex is kind of gross. It seems very messy, and it’s vulnerable in a way that I think would be very uncomfortable.”

For what researchers say is an array of reasons — including technology, heavy academic schedules and an overall slower-motion process of growing up — millennials and now Gen Zers are having less sex, with fewer partners, than their parents’ and grandparents’ generations did. The social isolation and transmission scares of the COVID-19 pandemic have no doubt played a role in the shift. But researchers say that’s not the whole story: The “no rush for sex” trend predates the pandemic, according to a solid body of research.

UCLA has been tracking behavioral trends for years through its annual California Health Interview Survey, the largest state health survey in the nation. It includes questions about sexual activity. In 2021, the survey found, the number of young Californians ages 18 to 30 who reported having no sexual partners in the prior year reached a decade high of 38%. In 2011, 22% of young people reported having no sexual partners during the prior year, and the percentage climbed fairly steadily as the decade progressed.

California adults ages 35 to 50 who participated in UCLA’s 2021 survey also registered an increase in abstinence from 2011 to 2021. But with the percentage of “no sex” respondents rising from 9% to 14% during that time frame, the increase was not as pronounced.

graph.png

The University of Chicago’s General Social Survey — which has been following shifts in Americans’ behavioral trends for decades — found that 3 in 10 Generation Z males, ages 18 to 25, surveyed in 2021 reported having gone without sex the prior year. One in four Gen Z women also reported having had no sex the prior year, according to Jean Twenge, a San Diego State University psychology professor who reviewed the data for her book “Generations.”

In an age where hook-ups might seem as unlimited as a right swipe on a dating app, it’s easy to assume that Gen Z “should be having the time of their lives sexually,” Twenge said.

But that’s not how it’s playing out. Twenge said the decline has been underway for roughly two decades.

She attributed the slowdown in sexual relations most significantly to what she calls the “slow-life factor.” Young people just aren’t growing up as fast as they once did. They’re delaying big milestones such as getting their driver’s licenses and going to college. And they’re living at home with their parents a lot longer.

“In times and places where people live longer and education takes longer, the whole developmental trajectory slows down,” she said. “And so for teens and young adults, one place that you’re going to notice that is in terms of dating and romantic relationships and sexuality.”

A slight majority of 18- to 30-year-olds — about 52% — reported having one sexual partner in 2021, a decrease from 2020, according to the UCLA survey. The proportion of young adults who reported having two or more sexual partners also declined, from 23% in 2011 to 10% in 2021.

graph 2.png'

Though sex was on the decline in the years leading into the pandemic, COVID-19 made dating trickier.

Many people tightened their social circles when the pandemic surged in 2020 and 2021. And young people’s reliance on cellphones and apps for their social interactions only intensified when in-person meet-ups posed a risk of serious illness.

In general, people coming of age in an era of dating apps say the notion of starting a relationship with someone they meet in person — say a chance encounter at a bar or dance club — seems like a piece of nostalgia. Even friendships are increasingly forged over texting and video chats.

“A lot of young people when you talk to them will say their best friends are people they’ve never met,” said Jessica Borelli, a professor of psychological science at UC Irvine. “Sometimes they live across the country or in other countries, and yet they have these very intimate relationships with them. … The in-person interface is not nearly as essential for the development of intimacy as it might be for older people.”

Ivanna Zuniga, 22, who recently graduated from UC Irvine with a degree in psychological sciences, said her peers have largely delayed sex and romance to focus on education and career. Zuniga, who is bisexual, has been with her partner for about four years. But their sex life is sporadic, she said, adding that they hadn’t been intimate in the month leading up to her graduation.

“I’ve been really preoccupied with my studies, and I’m always stressed because of all the things I have going on,” she said. “My libido is always shot, and I don’t really ever think about sex.”

The sexless phenomenon has made its way into pop culture. Gone are the days when meet-cutes in bars leading to one-night stands and sex at college parties were the cornerstone of coupling in films.

In “No Hard Feelings,” released this year, a 32-year-old woman is hired by “helicopter parents” to deflower their shy 19-year-old son. At a party, the woman frantically searching for her date busts open bedroom doors where she expects to find people feverishly tangled in sheets. Instead, she finds teens sitting side by side on a bed, fully clothed, scrolling their phones or playing virtual reality games. Bemused, she yells, “Doesn’t anyone f— anymore?”

While there are practical benefits to waiting to be in a physical relationship, including less risk of sexually transmitted diseases and unplanned pregnancy, Twenge argued that there are also downsides to young people eschewing sex and, more broadly, intimacy. Unhappiness and depression are at all-time highs among young adults, trend lines Twenge ties to the rise of smartphones and social media. And she noted with concern the steady decline in the birth rate.

“It creates the question of whether Social Security can survive,” Twenge said. “Will there be enough young workers to support older people in the system? Will there be enough young workers to take care of older people in nursing homes and in assisted-care facilities?”

Zuniga, who plans to pursue a doctorate in clinical psychology, can’t imagine pausing her education or career to have children, so safe sex is particularly important, she said. Others interviewed said “horror stories” involving friends who contracted herpes or other sexually transmitted infections had turned them off from casual sex.

“I prioritize my studies too much, and I can’t fathom the thought of having my identity as an academic fall secondary to being a mother,” Zuniga said. “Moving out of the income bracket that you’re born into is so hard to do, and a very secure way to do it is through education.”

For Rhodes, not having sex has taken a lot of the pressure off social interactions.

“It lets me relax,” she said. “It’s not that I don’t care about how I look or how I come off to other people. But I have a little extra help caring less about it, because I don’t have to worry about attracting specific kinds of people for specific things.”

And she pushes back against the notion that shying away from sex is some sort of societal problem that needs to be “fixed.” It might even be a sign that young people have more control of their bodies and desires, she said.

“Maybe you don’t have to have sex all the time,” Rhodes said. “Maybe if you’re doing other things in your life, and you’ve got other priorities, or you just don’t feel like it, that can be a good enough answer.”

Article Link

Archive
 
Say what you want about incels, but half of being incel is the word involuntary. At least most of them tried.
They don't have the skills. Adapt or Die. DO, or DO NOT. There is no 'try'.

Even fat, ugly jews learn how to leverage what they know/have into getting blowjobs from white girls. Happens all the time.

No excuse.
 
Its ironic how the generation that's having less sex seems to be so obsessed with sexuality
it's not if you think about it for more than a minute, dude
no sex = sexual frustration
we weren't exactly made to masturbate to animated or still visuals of human bodies for our entire lives

early exposure to pornography can also be damaging in this regard, explaining the uprise in faggotry to some degree
 
These idiots don't WANT to learn. Too much feminism,
You just answered why they don't want to learn.

There is no 'approaching' a man-hating witch who worships Hillary Clinton, or a rainbow-haired ditz with a pig ring in her snout and a head with enough mental illnesses to keep ten therapists employed. You've lost before you even gamble and you have to start from a losing position, making a lot of men go "forget this" even if their balls are about to explode from lack of getting laid.

Men will fuck landwhales. Men will fuck stupid (as in "jesus christ why do I put up with her?!") females. Men will fuck stupid and deathfat females. But if the target of their lust actively hates them from the get-go, that's a whole different ballgame.
 
Last edited:
One more proof of India's superiority. Arranged marriages work. Superpower 2020!
unironically though. the future belongs to those who show up.

50 years down the line the remnants of todays feminists will cope with getting groped and assaulted by ahmeds and pajeets on a daily basis by reminiscing about how they used to pwn the cis white heteronormative patriarchy back in the day

The real answer is that lack of testosterone makes modern boys bigger faggots and scared of being accused rather than risk taking and rulebreaking as they should.
that was true in an environment when the risk you took was merely about getting rejected, maybe cussed out and slapped across the face in the worst case scenario. in that situation it really is a matter of "just grow a pair and go for it dude, what's the worst that could happen!"

but today that's no longer the case. now the worst that could happen (and does happen) is basically total life ruination. this is no longer a situation where it makes sense to simply gas yourself up with cheap macho talk to get over your inhibitions.
 
Last edited:
Sex is over-rated if it's with the wrong person. And the youth of today are all wrong. They're stupid, and boring.

That's why MILFs and cougars were/are popular, they know how to swing it and they actually pick out partners they enjoy.
They're also less likely to pull the statutory rape card or other such #metoo shit. And for some bizarre reason, Americans under 30 have too much neoteny going on in general.
 
I had ZERO dollars as an enlisted man. I had better than average looks but had to learn charisma, how to drink, and how to lure women into bed.

These idiots don't WANT to learn. Too much feminism, too much soy, too much entitlement. They don't want to work for it and don't know how anyway. It's too hard.

None of us are entitled to something beautiful. Gotta work for it. Like Ty Cobb said, Fuck Luck. Make your own Luck.
I never enlisted, but don't they give you places to sleep and free food? Also how are you drinking there without money? The army gives free booze?
 
I never enlisted, but don't they give you places to sleep and free food? Also how are you drinking there without money? The army gives free booze?
he's bullshitting, of course soldiers get paid. the pay is just low.
or rather, it looks low, especially for newly enlisted recruits at boot camp, it's way below minimum wage. but when you factor in that in addition to their pay they are also provided with food and shelter and medical services by their employer it starts making more sense.
 
he's bullshitting, of course soldiers get paid. the pay is just low.
or rather, it looks low, especially for newly enlisted recruits at boot camp, it's way below minimum wage. but when you factor in that in addition to their pay they are also provided with food and shelter and medical services by their employer it starts making more sense.
I didn't bullshit. People either can't comprehend English, and/or don't have a common frame of reference, which makes it difficult to communicate.

Again. I did more work than most posters here or even most enlisted all day for the greater part of a decade before six in the morning.

Without powerleveling, who else has done surgery on another? I'll wait. Send me a PM. We can swap stories. All others, you can pay cash and wait in line.
 
he's bullshitting, of course soldiers get paid. the pay is just low.
or rather, it looks low, especially for newly enlisted recruits at boot camp, it's way below minimum wage. but when you factor in that in addition to their pay they are also provided with food and shelter and medical services by their employer it starts making more sense.
Ah k thanks. When I'm unfamiliar with a subject I hate making too many assumptions so I wasn't sure if I was wildly misunderstanding pay in the army.

I'm still surprised learning how much of the army doesn't really see fighting.
 
Its ironic how the generation that's having less sex seems to be so obsessed with sexuality, and LGBTQ shit.Literally go on any fandom and its always talks about a character's sexuality or yaoi addicts.For people who are so obsessed with sexuality, its surprising that they have the least amount of sex.
Because for a lot of them it's about having an identity and a community to belong to. This is especially true of the T part of the acronym, it gives lonely, confused teenagers with unsupervised Internet access an instant friend group, and their brains aren't developed enough yet for them to realize the potential long-term ramifications of "transitioning" as a condition for membership.
 
When we're competing with every other guy in the country, not to mention her fucking dog, of course men are getting demoralized and not bothering. The infinitesimal chance of the reward just isn't worth the tremendous effort required anymore.
It's not even just that. It's the fact that most women don't give a man the emotional support or camaraderie that women in the past gave their husbands/boyfriends and really women nowadays just don't have personalities or values that are conducive to being a good mate or mother. Why should I bother vying for a woman's affections when it's not even going to be long term nor be fruitful or even based on similar interests and values? That seems extremely pointless and like a genuine waste of time.

I don't even subscribe to that incel bullshit, but I do understand the more reasonable grievances they tend to have with modern women because they come from a place of a genuine desire to be a good partner and friend to a woman, not just some status symbol for her ego or some shit like that.

Technology, multiple generations of bad parenting and social media making a fundamental human need for companionship (with the opposite sex especially but in general) undesirable and even a rational choice is something that underlies how vapid and stupid a lot of modern life is. I can't really think of any other civilization that fucked up this bad to the point of basic biological needs being deemed pointless by a good deal of people. Usually it's bad governance, economic factors or military tactics or shit like that.
 
Last edited:
There is no 'approaching' a man-hating witch who worships Hillary Clinton, or a rainbow-haired ditz with a pig ring in her snout and a head with enough mental illnesses to keep ten therapists employed. You've lost before you even gamble and you have to start from a losing position, making a lot of men go "forget this" even if their balls are about to explode from lack of getting laid.
Not every woman worships Hillary Clinton. Not every woman is a rainbow haired ditz. You don't approach a woman asking about her politics. You can immediately spot if she's a dangerhair. Just avoid them. Women's politics don't matter, because they'll change their opinions for the right guy. Their values are as consistent as a moving river. If you lay down the law, she'll either tell you to piss off in which case you were better off without her or she'll yield and conform. Point is you don't know they hate you until you talk to them. At which point you just walk away, nigga.

today that's no longer the case. now the worst that could happen (and does happen) is basically total life ruination.
The worst thing that can happen to a man is being falsely accused of rape, but again, stay away from the dangerhairs and dont stick your dick in crazy and you'll be okay. #MeToo is over and these situations should be treated with laughter as there's no rape kit. If you want to know how to handle this situation, laugh at them, say no and tell them to talk to your lawyer. Never apologize. Block the number and threaten legal action. It is that simple. If it worked for Johnny Young Bosch, it'll work for you.

When we're competing with every other guy in the country, not to mention her fucking dog, of course men are getting demoralized and not bothering. The infinitesimal chance of the reward just isn't worth the tremendous effort required anymore.
You shouldn't be putting in tremendous effort. That's the problem. Guys DO put in tremendous effort and that's how the chicks wind up with inflated egos. You put in no effort, and that's how you get results. That's how it's always been.

It's not even just that. It's the fact that most women don't give a man the emotional support or camaraderie that women in the past gave their husbands/boyfriends and really women nowadays just don't have personalities or values that are conducive to being a good mate or mother. Why should I bother vying for a woman's affections when it's not even going to be long term nor be fruitful or even based on similar interests and values?
The reality is having a family is worth sifting through the bullshit to find someone decent. They DO exist. Like I said, there's nothing else out there. You can take your time, but outside of families life doesn't have anything to offer past 40+ that's of real, tangible value.
 
Back