Culture A ‘failure to launch’: Why young people are having less sex - For what researchers say is an array of reasons millennials and now Gen Zers are having less sex, with fewer partners, than their parents’ and grandparents.

tree.png
(Patrick Hruby / Los Angeles Times)

Vivian Rhodes figured she would eventually have sex.

She was raised in a Christian household in Washington state and thought sex before marriage would be the ultimate rebellion. But then college came and went — and no sex. Even flirting “felt unnatural,” she said.

In her early 20s, she watched someone she followed on Tumblr come out as asexual and realized that’s how she felt: She had yet to develop romantic feelings for anyone, and the physical act of sex just didn’t sound appealing.

“Some people assume this is about shaming other people, and it’s not,” said Rhodes, 28, who works as a certified nursing assistant in Los Angeles. “I’m glad people have fun with it and it works for them. But I think sex is kind of gross. It seems very messy, and it’s vulnerable in a way that I think would be very uncomfortable.”

For what researchers say is an array of reasons — including technology, heavy academic schedules and an overall slower-motion process of growing up — millennials and now Gen Zers are having less sex, with fewer partners, than their parents’ and grandparents’ generations did. The social isolation and transmission scares of the COVID-19 pandemic have no doubt played a role in the shift. But researchers say that’s not the whole story: The “no rush for sex” trend predates the pandemic, according to a solid body of research.

UCLA has been tracking behavioral trends for years through its annual California Health Interview Survey, the largest state health survey in the nation. It includes questions about sexual activity. In 2021, the survey found, the number of young Californians ages 18 to 30 who reported having no sexual partners in the prior year reached a decade high of 38%. In 2011, 22% of young people reported having no sexual partners during the prior year, and the percentage climbed fairly steadily as the decade progressed.

California adults ages 35 to 50 who participated in UCLA’s 2021 survey also registered an increase in abstinence from 2011 to 2021. But with the percentage of “no sex” respondents rising from 9% to 14% during that time frame, the increase was not as pronounced.

graph.png

The University of Chicago’s General Social Survey — which has been following shifts in Americans’ behavioral trends for decades — found that 3 in 10 Generation Z males, ages 18 to 25, surveyed in 2021 reported having gone without sex the prior year. One in four Gen Z women also reported having had no sex the prior year, according to Jean Twenge, a San Diego State University psychology professor who reviewed the data for her book “Generations.”

In an age where hook-ups might seem as unlimited as a right swipe on a dating app, it’s easy to assume that Gen Z “should be having the time of their lives sexually,” Twenge said.

But that’s not how it’s playing out. Twenge said the decline has been underway for roughly two decades.

She attributed the slowdown in sexual relations most significantly to what she calls the “slow-life factor.” Young people just aren’t growing up as fast as they once did. They’re delaying big milestones such as getting their driver’s licenses and going to college. And they’re living at home with their parents a lot longer.

“In times and places where people live longer and education takes longer, the whole developmental trajectory slows down,” she said. “And so for teens and young adults, one place that you’re going to notice that is in terms of dating and romantic relationships and sexuality.”

A slight majority of 18- to 30-year-olds — about 52% — reported having one sexual partner in 2021, a decrease from 2020, according to the UCLA survey. The proportion of young adults who reported having two or more sexual partners also declined, from 23% in 2011 to 10% in 2021.

graph 2.png'

Though sex was on the decline in the years leading into the pandemic, COVID-19 made dating trickier.

Many people tightened their social circles when the pandemic surged in 2020 and 2021. And young people’s reliance on cellphones and apps for their social interactions only intensified when in-person meet-ups posed a risk of serious illness.

In general, people coming of age in an era of dating apps say the notion of starting a relationship with someone they meet in person — say a chance encounter at a bar or dance club — seems like a piece of nostalgia. Even friendships are increasingly forged over texting and video chats.

“A lot of young people when you talk to them will say their best friends are people they’ve never met,” said Jessica Borelli, a professor of psychological science at UC Irvine. “Sometimes they live across the country or in other countries, and yet they have these very intimate relationships with them. … The in-person interface is not nearly as essential for the development of intimacy as it might be for older people.”

Ivanna Zuniga, 22, who recently graduated from UC Irvine with a degree in psychological sciences, said her peers have largely delayed sex and romance to focus on education and career. Zuniga, who is bisexual, has been with her partner for about four years. But their sex life is sporadic, she said, adding that they hadn’t been intimate in the month leading up to her graduation.

“I’ve been really preoccupied with my studies, and I’m always stressed because of all the things I have going on,” she said. “My libido is always shot, and I don’t really ever think about sex.”

The sexless phenomenon has made its way into pop culture. Gone are the days when meet-cutes in bars leading to one-night stands and sex at college parties were the cornerstone of coupling in films.

In “No Hard Feelings,” released this year, a 32-year-old woman is hired by “helicopter parents” to deflower their shy 19-year-old son. At a party, the woman frantically searching for her date busts open bedroom doors where she expects to find people feverishly tangled in sheets. Instead, she finds teens sitting side by side on a bed, fully clothed, scrolling their phones or playing virtual reality games. Bemused, she yells, “Doesn’t anyone f— anymore?”

While there are practical benefits to waiting to be in a physical relationship, including less risk of sexually transmitted diseases and unplanned pregnancy, Twenge argued that there are also downsides to young people eschewing sex and, more broadly, intimacy. Unhappiness and depression are at all-time highs among young adults, trend lines Twenge ties to the rise of smartphones and social media. And she noted with concern the steady decline in the birth rate.

“It creates the question of whether Social Security can survive,” Twenge said. “Will there be enough young workers to support older people in the system? Will there be enough young workers to take care of older people in nursing homes and in assisted-care facilities?”

Zuniga, who plans to pursue a doctorate in clinical psychology, can’t imagine pausing her education or career to have children, so safe sex is particularly important, she said. Others interviewed said “horror stories” involving friends who contracted herpes or other sexually transmitted infections had turned them off from casual sex.

“I prioritize my studies too much, and I can’t fathom the thought of having my identity as an academic fall secondary to being a mother,” Zuniga said. “Moving out of the income bracket that you’re born into is so hard to do, and a very secure way to do it is through education.”

For Rhodes, not having sex has taken a lot of the pressure off social interactions.

“It lets me relax,” she said. “It’s not that I don’t care about how I look or how I come off to other people. But I have a little extra help caring less about it, because I don’t have to worry about attracting specific kinds of people for specific things.”

And she pushes back against the notion that shying away from sex is some sort of societal problem that needs to be “fixed.” It might even be a sign that young people have more control of their bodies and desires, she said.

“Maybe you don’t have to have sex all the time,” Rhodes said. “Maybe if you’re doing other things in your life, and you’ve got other priorities, or you just don’t feel like it, that can be a good enough answer.”

Article Link

Archive
 
Yeah nah CP was legal til like the 70s/early 80s in some places and child marriage used to be way more common. Go back further and the age of consent was like 12. Pedophilia being openly normalized was sadly the situation for most of human history.
I don't think it's "normalized" these days as much as "not possible to ignore" , thanks to the internet where people stand up and admit to being pedos because they mistakenly believe they are in good company.....
 
Giving birth is painful and then women are trapped until they die so I'm not surprised. It's just not worth it.
It's literally the only thing in life that's worth while for men and women alike. Crazy how all it took was 30 years of psyoping and creature comforts to complete deter men and women from their literal ONLY true purpose on this planet.

And competition is steep.

Maybe you're funny and charming, but can't afford a house? No way are you getting picked over a man who does.
Just a date a younger woman who isn't immediately looking for a house. By the time she's old enough to care, you'll probably be able to get one. There's no advantage to dating older women. There never has been. There's always someone whom you're kenough for.
 
Yeah, I noticed this too - I think Biden has fucked up the "special relationship" and Sunak has been trying to wriggle away from their influence.

I haven't noticed anything similar from the USA, but it looks like countries are now subtly moving away from the Americans. Low birthrates and mass immigration are American ideals, and they seem to be there to make sure the USA doesn't collapse under its own demographics.
 
Yeah, I noticed this too - I think Biden has fucked up the "special relationship" and Sunak has been trying to wriggle away from their influence.

I haven't noticed anything similar from the USA, but it looks like countries are now subtly moving away from the Americans. Low birthrates and mass immigration are American ideals, and they seem to be there to make sure the USA doesn't collapse under its own demographics.
its no shock everyone sees how the US treats its "allies" which is either dumping them the moment its convenient or filling their land full of trannies and shit. I don't like sunak but i think he's not a big fan of troonery from the statements he's made on hot mics.

Hell average us citizen hates the current us regime look at those approval ratings.
 
Hell average us citizen hates the current us regime look at those approval ratings.
Honestly I make a lot of anti-American comments but you guys are the first victim of it.

It's a much older problem than you'd think, too.

It genuinely looks like the USA, in order to keep itself afloat, pushes the same ideology everywhere else so it won't lose its advantage.

It's blacks, by the way lol - the concern seems to be that if they become too numerous, the USA will split and cease to be a functional country. Civil War 2 - revenge of the slaves.

The French offhandedly told the Americans, during WWI, that the reason they treat America's 15,000,000 blacks "well" is so that if they became independent, they would have good relations. Everyone else in Europe seemed to agree with that sentiment.

This caused America to spergout for a fucking century. Unsurprisingly, since their peers just basically said "Well, if you guys break up, I might want to shag her" to your faces. Then, nodded at eachother in agreement. The complete fucking audacity of the French to say that is hilarious in of itself, but it shows a lot about the USA's conundrum.

Literally all of their decisions make sense if looked at from the perspective that they are torn between summarily massacring their minorities, or forcing everyone else to suffer alongside them. Those are America's two options if they want to continue as a major power.
 
Honestly I make a lot of anti-American comments
Putting the black issue aside, truth is outside of the urban bughives vast majority of us are normal and sane and hate with a burning passion everything that is going on. I can tell you just the day to day mutters of people around me in my relatively purple area would get them banned from the farms for fedposting. I hear it from people I would have never expected just 4 years ago its wild how bad things have deteriorated for us to get to that point.
 
I hear it from people I would have never expected just 4 years ago its wild how bad things have deteriorated for us to get to that point.
Nah, even within the bughives.

There's a fucking lot of internal propaganda in the USA. It's to the point where I need to have like, an English to English dictionary because certain terms are warped beyond their original meaning.

Tucker Carlson is how I see the "intelligent average" but the sheer amount of secrecy, bizarre indexes and mathematical fuckery - shit like Gerrymandering is the least of your concerns. There's no chance anyone in the USA, even the state themselves, know what goes on internally.
 
Yeah, I noticed this too - I think Biden has fucked up the "special relationship" and Sunak has been trying to wriggle away from their influence.

I haven't noticed anything similar from the USA, but it looks like countries are now subtly moving away from the Americans. Low birthrates and mass immigration are American ideals, and they seem to be there to make sure the USA doesn't collapse under its own demographics.
I’m going to contain myself from sperging out about the American regime too much, but I believe the problem is endemic. Sunak and all UK politicians that find success are American representatives, like a Roman vassal state. Any wriggling away can be attributed to America having to use its "bandwidth" elsewhere as keeping Europe under its pos ww2 dominion is an active process.
 
Sunak and all UK politicians that find success are American representatives, like a Roman vassal state.
Oh I think they just straight up murdered a bunch of others.

Anything to do with Heath - the guy was a straight up puppet. Known paedophile, all his enemies just fuckin died - pre-Thatcher, too. Thatcher was just a continuation of it.

Amazingly, Labour was the one to stand up for anti-immigration, briefly - when Enoch Powell was deposed, and Churchill finally died, Labour actually held the line for a few years until 1970.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hoplixe and Wright
It's literally the only thing in life that's worth while for men and women alike. Crazy how all it took was 30 years of psyoping and creature comforts to complete deter men and women from their literal ONLY true purpose on this planet.
it will be somewhat amusing when/if TPTB attempt to rile up the women to white feather the men and men's reaction is "oh a Ukrainian trench? Ah jeez dude, sounds pretty painful and I'd be trapped, no thanks"
 
it will be somewhat amusing when/if TPTB attempt to rile up the women to white feather the men and men's reaction is "oh a Ukrainian trench? Ah jeez dude, sounds pretty painful and I'd be trapped, no thanks"
Could the women even be riled up to pass out white feathers?

1: That would mean women approaching men, something they have been repeatedly told that they would be raped, beaten, tortured, and murdered by the evil brute males by every facet of society.

2:How would they find the time? Every woman is working an 8-5 to feed their furbabies.

3:Where would they go to pass the feathers out? There arent any bars or public places. There are no men on campus and they arent allowed any spaces to congregate amongst themselves. I guess barista thots and "servers" could pass them out with coffee but I dont think the managers would be happy and people would avoid those places even more.
 
Could the women even be riled up to pass out white feathers?

1: That would mean women approaching men, something they have been repeatedly told that they would be raped, beaten, tortured, and murdered by the evil brute males by every facet of society.

2:How would they find the time? Every woman is working an 8-5 to feed their furbabies.

3:Where would they go to pass the feathers out? There arent any bars or public places. There are no men on campus and they arent allowed any spaces to congregate amongst themselves. I guess barista thots and "servers" could pass them out with coffee but I dont think the managers would be happy and people would avoid those places even more.
you know I actually considered that. I suspect it would all be solely on TV and social media if they did it at all. I mean the army is now doing its recruitment at anime conventions and such but again how will that work none of the people at those venues are really talking to women in the first place.

On your first point the other part is a lot of the young guys are severely autistic too if they're anything like most guys I know, including myself sometimes, when out in public they avoid looking at stranger women and keep a resting bitch face on at all times. I imagine any approach would be met with "uh yeah ok" and then moving on.
 
you know I actually considered that. I suspect it would all be solely on TV and social media if they did it at all. I mean the army is now doing its recruitment at anime conventions and such but again how will that work none of the people at those venues are really talking to women in the first place.

On your first point the other part is a lot of the young guys are severely autistic too if they're anything like most guys I know, including myself sometimes, when out in public they avoid looking at stranger women and keep a resting bitch face on at all times. I imagine any approach would be met with "uh yeah ok" and then moving on.
Well, i kind of only made my first point from the women's perspective for the sake of my arguement, but the truth is that both men and women have been conditioned to avoid each other. Everything women are told from kindergarten is that "the boys are bad and will hurt you" and the boys are pretty much told the same thing. And thats before getting into the actual ways boys and girls are socialized and treated. Girls are treated like princesses and boys like diseased dogs.
 
So one thing I don't quite get. People are saying that one of the reasons nobody is having kids is that they're too expensive. Well, yes, but also no.

In times past when people were way fucking poorer and life was way harder than it is now, people had MORE kids, not less. Now depending on how far back you go some of that was to compensate for infant mortality and all, but still. In general, people were more broke, but families were larger.

What's up with that?
Decades and decades of anti-natalism and anti -family messaging.

Women are taught that children RUIN YOUR LIFE and that GIRLBOSSES don't have kids. Or get married to some stupid man who doesn't make more money than her and can't provide her with an amazing lifestyle.

Staying home with the kids = EVIL PATRIARCHY
 
Well, i kind of only made my first point from the women's perspective for the sake of my arguement, but the truth is that both men and women have been conditioned to avoid each other. Everything women are told from kindergarten is that "the boys are bad and will hurt you" and the boys are pretty much told the same thing. And thats before getting into the actual ways boys and girls are socialized and treated. Girls are treated like princesses and boys like diseased dogs.
Never stopped me from splaying your waifu out on a table and making her squeal like a piggy. Maybe you're just autistic. I never had any problems turning your university crush into a human lawn mower with some anal beads.
 
Back