- Joined
- Oct 2, 2018
There have been implications that skordass was not being the most helpful.
Also, if russle needs free legal representation, I have just the guy: https://chat.openai.com/
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
Also, if russle needs free legal representation, I have just the guy: https://chat.openai.com/
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2019
The Greer Streams were what got me into Rekieta.
Well, at least one of them stayed the same.
DSP's Tax Lawyer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2021
Are there any Triple XL sized Taylor Swift shirts Ralph could wear when collecting?
Doctor Socrates
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2023
Will the Judge be forced to say no fag im not giving you another deadline and force russell to reply to motions or is it just too 
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Last edited:
I'm not a Robot
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2019
Hiring Skordas was funny, and it allowed Skordas to take on Greer after Greer went after his family. It was win-win, until they lost.
Last edited:
DSP's Tax Lawyer
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2021
The seething in the responses from Rusty will be glorious
- Joined
- May 16, 2019
Man, Hardin is taking no prisoners. Three proper arguments to say "put up or shut up" against a motion to delay.
This might be the most polite way I've seen to call someone a cowardly bitch.
This might be the most polite way I've seen to call someone a cowardly bitch.
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
I'm sure he could find a Travis Kelce jersey, they must make those in suitable sizes.
Hardin's response is great. I particularly like how he wraps it all up at the end:
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2019
This Hardin fellow is turning out to be quite the stone cold assassin, isn't he? His reply contained multiple headshots, not the least of which was the bit about the Change.org petition.
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2015
A thousand Kiwi thanks to Freemantle's attorneys for digging up every one of Russtard's cases for our use and entertainment.
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
Oh, Hardin, I see what you did there!
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2021
Learning no lessons from the Ariana Grande case, Russell is once again late and tries to pin the blame on time.
Russell is going to lose his shit over that footnote. He should explain to the court that a stalking conviction is basically just a parking ticket, and see how that goes.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
About 24 hours from the farms to the docket. Damn good shit.
Court proceedings are public and copyright free, correct? Someone could compile all these and print them in a book?
This is honestly way better than anything Fatrick has ever written, even his rambling insane defense of not paying Quasi.
Court proceedings are public and copyright free, correct? Someone could compile all these and print them in a book?
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2023
Logistics is important in Lawfare too it would seem. If Greer simply picked a cheaper lawyer that wasn't as big of name he could get much more bang for his buck.
What are the chances of the court granting his stay simply because he is pro se and he is asking for lawyer(s)? My understanding is that courts are very willing to grant leeway for people to get lawyers. Is Hardin pointing out Greer hasn't actually taken steps to get these lawyers likely to be enough to get the court to rule in Moon's favor?
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
I want to believe he's got poor odds in this motion.
This isn't a criminal trial where he'd have a right to counsel and he'd get a public defender appointed for him if he was indigent. He brought this case, he chose freely when, where, and how to file it; it's civil, and thus he doesn't have a right to legal counsel; he's welcome to retain counsel, but he has no right to it - he opted to dive into this pro se, and nobody forced him to do that but himself. The saying, "your lack of planning is not my emergency," applies to the situation quite well. The time for Russ to delay to find and retain legal counsel was before he filed the suit; to delay the suit for that reason now is prejudicial to the defendants. What's more, forcing the court to rule on motions that Russ now feels necessary purely due to his own previous unpreparedness is a waste of judicial time and resources, and the defendants are also forced to expend money responding to them.
If Russ hired a lawyer, paid them some de minimis retainer, and then the lawyer filed an appearance and requested a delay for the purposes of getting up to speed on the clusterfuck that they're now responsible for salvaging, that would almost certainly be granted (and you know they'd undoubtedly still want that delay, if Russ managed to succeed in hiring them). But delaying before the lawyer is even retained - and for the specific reason of "I can't afford this lawyer, but in 60 to 90 days I might" - is putting the cart before the horse.
All of that aside, I hold little optimism for the legal system to do the sensible thing here, so I'll hedge my bets and say that the court might tell Russ he has 60 days, not 90. If it gives Russ any less than 60 days, I'd consider that a win. I'd rather be pleasantly surprised than be let down by the order...
edit: I might add, the fact that Russell's lawyers haven't agreed to represent him for $1 now and a promise to pay them more in 60 to 90 days - which would be sufficient for them to get their foot in the door and request a delay for that reason - is indicative of their level of confidence in his ability to raise the money.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
I'm optimistic. I feel the court will entertain the possibility Russel can get a lawyer, so they will give him 7 days to put up or shut up about it. The magistrate will almost certainly want Russel to get a lawyer and wrangle this shit, so they will probably light a fire under his ass to get it done.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
RUSS KNOWS ABOUT THE FUNDING!
The lawyers he’s trying to retain are not particularly “big name” ones. They are an org with only three lawyers in them, and they have only a few cases they are proud of (as shown on their website).
I originally thought they would grant it, but with Hardin's latest motion, I think that may just tip it over in Null's favor. Not a big deal anyway (for either party) considering the lawsuit would have been essentially on pause when Null appeals to SCOTUS next month
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 17, 2015
Pretty sure Russtard's works were delivered pre-tarnished.
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2019
HAHAHAHAHAHA!! I've been waiting for his freakout over the fundraiser and he did NOT disappoint!