- Joined
- Feb 4, 2023
Quite Frankly I don't think the interview is very good.
I've finally watch the first sixteen minutes of the interview and I had a lot of stuff to say about Putin's historical overview of Russia and Ukraine's relations. I have a understanding of what Putin is going for with him going far back into the medieval period of Russia but I generally disliked him ranting off-topic on Poland.This. While it is a fascinating history lesson, I fail to see as to how events from the period of 800 AD to 1600 AD are at all relevant to the current situation.
Rationale for 800 AD to 1600 AD
I believe that the whole point of Putin describing the events from 800 AD to 1600 AD is to describe that Ukrainians (and to some extent Belarusians) and the land they live on are of the same people as the Russians, as all three peoples were united under the Kievan Rus and the Novgorod Republic. Putin paints Poland have attempted to separate these peoples into different ethnicities and cultures so that they can easily be controlled.This attempt failed because one of the most famous Ukrainian leaders and founder of the Ukrainian Defensive War Against the Russian Invasion Kiwi Farms thread Bohdan Khmelnitsky was a staunch Russian ally who put Ukraine under Russian control as he believed Ukraine is a part of Russia as Ukrainians and Russians are the same people. This segment was mostly good, as Putin puts forth that one of the reasons Russia is invading Ukraine is on a historical basis of reunification of Ukraine and Russia (similar to China and Taiwan).
However, Putin giving the archives to Tucker during the beginning of the interview was such a weird gesture, like I get it, giving evidence of a significant claim regarding Khmelnitsky, but it felt like Putin was in some way bribing Tucker.
Putin politispergs on Poland
His segment on Poland post-1700s was pretty bad, irrelevant, and very cherry-picked, and Putin felt the need to antagonize Poland because Poland is the loudest barking dog with no bite nowadays. Putin did not mention that Poland was split up between Prussia and the Russian Empire in the late 1700s and that Poles were living under German and Russian rule for most of the 1800s to early 1900s.When Poland regained its statehood, Putin cherry-picked really hard to push the framing that the USSR was innocent and righteous before World War II. Putin mentioned treaties, but never mentioned that the USSR launched a failed invasion against Poland in 1919, which of course why Poland does not trust the Soviet Union in its diplomacy and threatened it will shoot down Soviet planes if they came near Poland in regards to the Czechoslovak Crisis.
Then, I rolled my eyes when Putin mentioned that the Poles were collaborating with Hitler and the Nazis while glossing over the Molotov-Ribbentrop pact. Okay, fine, I can see how Poland and other European countries like the UK and France making appeasements to Germany so they won't get invaded or trying to prevent a war to be started can be considered collaboration, but you can't just mention that and give a one word mention of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact like that in which the Soviets collaborated with the Nazis and then by coincidence in 1939 invaded Poland the same time Hitler invaded the country. Like no shit, this is why Poles despise Russia.
Even so, the USSR did not back up Polish rebels in the Warsaw Uprising because they feared that the Polish rebels would go against the Soviet state so they let the Germans destroy the Uprising instead. And then there were reports of mass rapes of Polish women by Soviet soldiers as the Soviet Army expelled the Germans from Poland.
Putin pushing for the fact that Poles should be grateful that the Soviets gave them German land with cities like Stettin, Breslau, and Danzig, as well as liberation of Poland from the Germans while the Soviets were themselves in fault of why Poland is in German occupation in the first place was pretty tone-deaf and had a lack of understanding of why Poland hates Russia. Sure, I get it, Polish people are very annoying nowadays and can't back up their words in regards to defending Ukraine from Russia in their invasion, but they had clear reasons to dislike or distrust the Russian state for what they did back in 1919, 1939, and 1944.
The weird tangent on Poland was really irrelevant on the whole Russian-Ukraine conflict and I felt that Putin wanted to antagonize Poles with this interview. The fact Putin went off this tangent really harms Russia's stance the more you know of history; I kinda agree with @Fighting Type Pokemon that Putin's age is starting to show.
I think this is the instance where Tucker should have interrupted Putin to have him stay on topic. Like, who fucking cares about Poland in WW2 and the Interwar Period, it has nothing to fucking do with Ukraine. Yes, Western MSM journos have interrupted Putin rudely before, but an interruption here would have been justified.
Just started watching Putin commenting on the Bolsheviks and their role in creating the modern Ukrainian state, but I had a lot to say in those two segments.
Last edited: