Minimizing the risks to yourself by not pissing off people has nothing to do with absolving perpetrators of their crimes or justifying them but if a person wants to roll the dice on destroying 20 years of a man's life for their own selfish benefit then they're obviously increasing the odds of being murdered, so weigh out the potential consequences and the potential benefits and act accordingly, I don't know why this is a controversial take?
Is it because I framed my take in a shitposty way to make femcel posters on this site seethe? Okay?
Are you human? Or are you an LLM trained on Paul Elam and r/mgtow?
Or has the pink triangle already driven you insane?
You're failing the Turing Test for me m8.
From what I've seen with women they'll label anyone a pick-me if that woman actually appeals to men and is attractive to them because for some reason women like to actively sabotage other women.
Pick-mes aren't defined by their "attractiveness to men", whatever you consider that to be. Pick-mes are defined by their willingness to throw other girls under the bus by tolerating and participating in sexist behavior in the hopes that men will give her a one-time pass, which surprise, they don't get, because they hang out with sexist men.
I thought it was a free speech forum where people laugh at retards online. I'm laughing at women right now and everyone knows it.
I'm LAUGHING so hard rn, he typed furiously, I'M SO AMUSED AND DEFINITELY NOT ANGRY. WHAT A GREAT TIME I AM HAVING.
The "progress" of feminism should be reversed while still allowing women to be legally recognized as the people they are, but they have no place in politics and such.
This is a contradiction in terms. You either roll back women's rights (to vote, to own their own property, to unilaterally divorce, to drive, open her own bank account, etc.) or you don't. You can't have your patriarchal utopia and legal recognition of female personhood, too.
He's got a point, stay away from niggers and don't betray your husbands, that's pretty basic shit.
How about men get control of their fucking emotions for 10 seconds before blowing some other dude's head off in their bedroom? Seems easier than trying to control your "passion" for you.
or maybe you're the kind of guy who needs to be in prison to control his "passions" so he doesn't shoot anyone else
"property" sounds so negative now, but I'd rather children, especially daughters, remain the property of their parents and then their husband than become the property of the state and subject to the moralities pushed by progressive degenerates.
The only reason I see people opposing this is because those people want state funded schools to be able to teach kids about buttfucking and whatnot without parents having any say about it.
I would prefer not to become property of my husband for reasons that have nothing to do with buttfucking in a public school,
The only heat these fatties generate is between their thighs when they spend 5 minutes on the treadmill.
That's nothing compared to the heat these thighs generate in your imagination.
You keep bringing up Islam. It's almost like you have a problem with a culture that raises women with self-respect and modesty because you have neither?
Aw. he's mad that none of the sluts will fuck him.
rape is hilarious when women's voting habits are the reason for it happening to them.
If Bernie's the one doing it, it's no rape
How is that bait? Most people agree that cops shouldn't be able to murder law-abiding citizens and get away with it.
I'll take you one further: most people agree that cops shouldn't summarily execute people suspected of committing misdemeanor-level crime. It's something to do with "due process" and "punishment to match the crime".
Wait, so my only options are wear a hijab or be a slut?
If you went for the hijab the men would be back at it again in two weeks because they're getting aroused by the sight of your bare nose or something.
Society holding women accountable for the negative outcomes of risky behavior instead of pretending not to understand why the girl getting black out drunk with a bunch of degenerates led to her waking up with sore holes would do a lot to fix things tbh.
Stop telling women that they're powerful. Stop with the rape hysteria and stop giving women an unwarranted sense of invulnerability. Yeah. Fewer women would get raped if more women understood that rape is a potential outcome of risky, degenerate behavior.
> blames women for getting raped, murdered
> does not blame men for being rapists, murderers.
How is that fair?
Don't tell me to wear a seatbelt, tell that asshole not to run stoplights!
Don't tell me to lock my front door at night, tell people to stop robbing me!
That's exactly the attitude I'm talking about that causes more women to be raped than necessary.
We do tell that asshole not to run stoplights... he gets ticketed and summonsed for crashing into your car.
We do tell people to not rob other people... and the ones caught stealing anyway go to jail.
Where would you draw the line with this? At what point are men actually responsible for their own behavior, instead of passing the buck and blaming women for whatever they did because "she made me so angry", or "she should have known better not to dress like that", or "if she didn't want to get beaten, she should have made roast beef instead of tacos"? Because the way you describe men makes them sound like dogs with poor impulse control. Why are the men (who need women to behave just right lest the men chimp out) the ones who should naturally be in control? If you're barely able to control yourselves why do men deserve to control women?
