- Joined
- Jan 15, 2019
Women who get upset at men staring at their tits should do a better job hiding them. Healthy women are flattered to be attractive enough to warrant second looks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hah, PC Master race!A grown man, serenading an Xbox. Wat?!?
Finding one nowadays in the rotten west is harder than finding a bigfoot riding a unicorn.Healthy women
Apple also shit out Siri and every faggot with a "tech" blog was proclaiming it to be a revolution in personal computing. It was like the heavens themselves parted and deposited a holy artifact upon us mere mortals.Apple is a trendsetter.
Google is the shit your boring grandparents use.
I use Siri when I’m cooking for timers or changing music and I don’t want to cover my phone in raw meat, flour, etc. Thats all it’s really all it’s good for.Apple also shit out Siri and every faggot with a "tech" blog was proclaiming it to be a revolution in personal computing. It was like the heavens themselves parted and deposited a holy artifact upon us mere mortals.
To this day I have not seen a single person IRL use it, and it's been almost a decade and a half - because it turns out it's fucking gay, just like these faggot goggles. And you didn't even have to pay $3500 for that.
The iPhone I'd argue was different. It was just a natural evolution of stuff already popular on the market, especially for business folks (ie Blackberry handhelds) and could easily be carried around for convenience. They were just smart enough to add sparkly buttons and ride off the "cool" coattails of the iPod to make it marketable to normies.Everyone joked when Apple revealed the iphone as well.
It was usability and ease of use that was key. There was no Android and compared to the Blackberry and co, it was a league ahead in UI design and accessibility.The iPhone I'd argue was different. It was just a natural evolution of stuff already popular on the market, especially for business folks (ie Blackberry handhelds) and could easily be carried around for convenience. They were just smart enough to add sparkly buttons and ride off the "cool" coattails of the iPod to make it marketable to normies.
If it wasn't giant snorkling goggles on someones face, I'd say maybe it had a chance.
The Tactile feedback of Blackberry was really good.It was usability and ease of use that was key. There was no Android and compared to the Blackberry and co, it was a league ahead in UI design and accessibility.
Even Voyager back in the 00s (10s?) Was calling out non-tactile interfaces on stuff. Bring back switches, buttons and toggles!The Tactile feedback of Blackberry was really good.
I just wish Auto manufacturers went back to Tactile dashboards instead of electronic screens.
Even Voyager back in the 00s (10s?) Was calling out non-tactile interfaces on stuff. Bring back switches, buttons and toggles!
Spending $3000 on a glorified Occulus is peak consoomerism. However, if you actually spend that much and find out that you can't do whatever the fuck you want with it, I understand the rage.They're also so addicted to Apple Vision Pro that they're seen walking in the streets with this thing on. This is a new low.
View attachment 5697842
God's truth. I hope whatever fucking retard first came up with the idea of replacing every control in your car with a single giant touchscreen got maimed and disfigured in a car crash. Not only is it incredibly gay to operate everything in your car via a glorified smartphone but the complete lack of any kind of feedback other than visual means it distracts you from the road by design, which is dangerous and REALLY dumb.The Tactile feedback of Blackberry was really good.
I just wish Auto manufacturers went back to Tactile dashboards instead of electronic screens.
Remember all those "This update has made it possible to charge your iPhone by microwaving it/waterproof/etc" 4chan hoaxes?There's also the anti-consumer ransomware angle: having every single control and feature of the car defined in software (as opposed to having hardware buttons) means the manufacturer can remove features from your car and fuck with your preferences at will unless you pay a subscription fee or something. Neat huh?
Spending $3000 on a glorified Occulus is peak consoomerism. However, if you actually spend that much and find out that you can't do whatever the fuck you want with it, I understand the rage.
Yes, but it also means they can insert advertisements into the very expensive vehicle, and get some of the same kind of money those smartphone manufacturers get to enjoy. It's also slightly easier to have fewer parts across different vehicle types.Not only is it incredibly gay to operate everything in your car via a glorified smartphone but the complete lack of any kind of feedback other than visual means it distracts you from the road by design, which is dangerous and REALLY dumb.
There's more of that easy money.the manufacturer can remove features from your car and fuck with your preferences at will unless you pay a subscription fee or something
I have an Honor whose call function is so moody, I went and got grandmaphone just for calls.Have a phone worthless for making phonecalls in an emergency;
US Navy learned the flaws of touchscreen controls the hard way.God's truth. I hope whatever fucking retard first came up with the idea of replacing every control in your car with a single giant touchscreen got maimed and disfigured in a car crash.
God's truth. I hope whatever fucking retard first came up with the idea of replacing every control in your car with a single giant touchscreen got maimed and disfigured in a car crash. Not only is it incredibly gay to operate everything in your car via a glorified smartphone but the complete lack of any kind of feedback other than visual means it distracts you from the road by design, which is dangerous and REALLY dumb.
US Navy learned the flaws of touchscreen controls the hard way.