Not Just Bikes / r/fuckcars / Urbanists / New Urbanism / Car-Free / Anti-Car - People and grifters who hate personal transport, freedom, cars, roads, suburbs, and are obsessed with city planning and urban design

You tease.
I wish this was all just a bad dream and that I am actually living in the good timeline.
Unfortunately we are living in the bad timeline and this is reality.
This comment made him so assmad he opened a thread on it in the Deep Thoughts board for exceptional people lol.
Do not assume that it is worthy of the title "man".
Regardless, if it wishes to rage and mald alone, so be it.
 
The main reason urbanists like trams is because it’s easy to reroute or discontinue an unprofitable bus route while getting rid of an unprofitable tram route requires the road be torn up and repaved.
I disagree. I think the main reason they like them is because to a normie trams are kinda exotic and cute. Trams to most people aren't something they use everyday but something they use during holidays and traveling. Trams are after all pretty impractical in most circumstances, including most public transport circumstances so they tend have a novelty factor where ever they are. There just is more positive association to trams than busses or trains so urbanists like to parade them around to masses who haven't thought about logistics or anything else like. A pure feels tactic.
This comment made him so assmad he opened a thread on it in the Deep Thoughts board for exceptional people lol.



Fuck cars user hits the breaking point when their spouse asks them to visit the grocery store using a car to pick up something they forgot.

User also hates that the house has extra space and follows the standard Fuck Cars dogma that it’s as easy to move a week’s groceries on bike than as in a car.

Surprisingly, the comments aren’t calling for a divorce.

View attachment 5713618


View attachment 5713619
These people totally overestimate how much cars cost. Sure you put tons of money on cars if you want but you don't have to. Cars have occasional big ticket expenses but when you have one the short trips are very cheap and cut so much time while giving you many more options.
 
Trams are after all pretty impractical in most circumstances
I briefly lived in Toronto years ago.

Was waiting for a streetcar which never came, turned out a small car crash blocked it for more than an hour. If it were a bus it would have gone around and been slightly late.

There's a reason most cities tore out their streetcar lines and replaced them with busses. The most you can say is that when oil is expensive they may be cheaper to operate but there are a form of electric bus which just uses overhead power lines.

Streetcars are fucking stupid.
 
I briefly lived in Toronto years ago.

Was waiting for a streetcar which never came, turned out a small car crash blocked it for more than an hour. If it were a bus it would have gone around and been slightly late.

There's a reason most cities tore out their streetcar lines and replaced them with busses. The most you can say is that when oil is expensive they may be cheaper to operate but there are a form of electric bus which just uses overhead power lines.

Streetcars are fucking stupid.
That wouldn’t be a problem if we banned all cars.

Checkmate Chud.
 
I disagree. I think the main reason they like them is because to a normie trams are kinda exotic and cute. Trams to most people aren't something they use everyday but something they use during holidays and traveling. Trams are after all pretty impractical in most circumstances, including most public transport circumstances so they tend have a novelty factor where ever they are. There just is more positive association to trams than busses or trains so urbanists like to parade them around to masses who haven't thought about logistics or anything else like. A pure feels tactic.
I've brought up that /r/fuckcars has the most touristy images in their head when it comes to real cities and then actually tries to use that as an argument for reality.

Venice of course is an obvious one, but the real "Venice" is just an Italian city off the Mediterranean. I'm sure that you can have a romantic boat ride serenaded by a singing gondolier, but that's just tourism and every month the permanent population of the island decreases.

The same of course with San Francisco. If it's not drugs and degeneracy, you probably had in your mind the Golden Gate bridge and trolleys down Market Street.

I'll be the first to admit that when I was around 13, almost every city I went to vacation on was cooler, better, or more interesting than my hometown.
 
Today in no-fun-allowed:
1707695732026.png

This park in Florida with safety village. Training kids young to be car dependent.jpeg
1707695739865.png

Source (Archive)

It's not rocket science why kids like these parks; they get to pretend to be their parents in a kid sized town.
 
can someone explain why youtube shill these channels so hard?

i have never watched anything related to city planning, yet adam something and other keep being reccomended, even after i click to not show these faggots channel anymore
Tech company employees and owners really like this system of belief because they live like this already/enjoy having easy access to low mobility workers.

Google/Facebook/etc. are already trying to build “walkable” company towns, and this is just a means of creating support for that.

IMG_5897.jpegIMG_5896.jpeg

I’m sure there are other parties involved like the WEF and their 15 minute cities, but in summary it’s because a lot of money is behind promoting this to people.
 
This comment made him so assmad he opened a thread on it in the Deep Thoughts board for exceptional people lol.



Fuck cars user hits the breaking point when their spouse asks them to visit the grocery store using a car to pick up something they forgot.

User also hates that the house has extra space and follows the standard Fuck Cars dogma that it’s as easy to move a week’s groceries on bike than as in a car.

Surprisingly, the comments aren’t calling for a divorce.

View attachment 5713618


View attachment 5713619

I was kind of surprised to read that this was in fact a woman and not just the histrionic one in a gay relationship. Looking at the post history, typing patterns tend to be closer to be woman (periods but no caps) but more obvious ones emerge:
2024-02-11 18_05_30-overview for snarkitall - Brave.png

This subreddit may be worth checking out in the future:
2024-02-11 18_04_51-overview for snarkitall - Brave.png

...trouble in paradise?
2024-02-11 18_05_12-overview for snarkitall - Brave.png

Rides public transportation, complains about subhumans:
2024-02-11 18_06_43-overview for snarkitall - Brave.png
 
This comment made him so assmad he opened a thread on it in the Deep Thoughts board for exceptional people lol.
Do not assume that it is worthy of the title "man".
Regardless, if it wishes to rage and mald alone, so be it.
I just wanted to see what people thought on the matter. I'm not trying to rant, only to read Farmers think of it and to debate points made which I disagree with. If I wanted to have a spergout I would have argued with him here instead of making a thread in Mass Debates.
can someone explain why youtube shill these channels so hard?
It must be an update to the algorithm that makes it suggest content like this. I've never shown any interest in urbanization or cars on Youtube. I've also been getting a lot of tranny gaming channels in my recommended along with these.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blue gopher snakes
Tech company employees and owners really like this system of belief because they live like this already/enjoy having easy access to low mobility workers.

Google/Facebook/etc. are already trying to build “walkable” company towns, and this is just a means of creating support for that.
Company towns are historically notorious for treating their workers like shit. "Sixteen Tons" is a great song but it also refers to company scrip which is worthless if you leave or if the company shuts down.

For all the pro-commie rhetoric about "companies exploiting workers" I guarantee you that these same people will happily lap up the idea of "instead of paying you in inflating U.S. dollars, we will pay you in MetaCoins" (or some other new digital currency).
 
View attachment 5713932
I agree with this. American cars should be smaller.
I drove an unreasonably small car for most of the past decade and there's really no benefit to doing so. Most cars on the road are low spec crossover SUVs which are just a taller version of the red shitbox above. They are more practical and offer more space for transporting larger items with minimal weight or fuel use difference.

Most of the people who buy trucks are buying them to tow things or drive on bad roads, and good luck doing either of those things in a 1.3L car with no ground clearance and tiny tires.
 
I have a 'midsize' pickup. I wish they still made them in this size though, with a usable bed:
View attachment 5714190
That vehicle, if produced today, would not meet highway safety standards. For one thing, those gloriously thin and unobtrusive A-pillars wouldn't hold up in a rollover, it has poor frontal offset collision ratings, can't pass the side impact test, etc.
I mean there's nothing wrong with it, but bugmen would be screeching (yes, the same bugmen that don't like big modern trucks) about MURDER ON THE ROAD and organizing class-action lawsuits against GM.
 
Back