Trainwreck Jill C Noyes Rodrigues / David Rodrigues / Rodrigues Family Ministries / Rodrigues Family Serving Jesus / All Things Truth Printing Ministry - Batshit MLM-shill narc mom of 13 starving children and her jobless "headship". Grifting and drifting across the US in an RV. Wanted by WV CPS.

A "fan" of Jill's from Australia sent a batch of fugly prarie dresses to her for the children. Not even the most hardline IBLP followers wear prarie dresses any more; these poor girls will be laughed at even more than usual in these getups.
They look kind of half assed but I do think prairie dresses can be pretty and those pretty prairie nighties. Like this:

1706509159563.png

Jill has decided the best way to prevent Tessie from being beautiful is to smear ice blue eyeshadow on her from lash to brow.
Her cosmetology license is so out of date she doesn't know people usually don't do the monochromatic look anymore like that. I wonder if she's still licensed and could update it or if they fully expire after a certain time. I feel bad for them having super old makeup used on them that probably has staph or some shit because makeup expires.
 
They look kind of half assed but I do think prairie dresses can be pretty and those pretty prairie nighties. Like this:

View attachment 5675559


Her cosmetology license is so out of date she doesn't know people usually don't do the monochromatic look anymore like that. I wonder if she's still licensed and could update it or if they fully expire after a certain time. I feel bad for them having super old makeup used on them that probably has staph or some shit because makeup expires.
Someone on Reddit did some digging, and surprisingly, Jill's beautician license is still current, she renewed it in 2021, next time is in 2025.
And in some circles, the monochromatic shadow look is back in, but I'm of the opinion if you did it the first time it was in style, you're too old the second time it comes back. Maybe it's just the girls playing around, God knows they can't look at trends in current magazines or online.

The nightgowns are lovely, but Jill would make the girls wear mismatched long-sleeved shirts under them, gotta show the world how Gawdly and mawhdest they are compared to us heathens.
 
The nightgowns are lovely, but Jill would make the girls wear mismatched long-sleeved shirts under them, gotta show the world how Gawdly and mawhdest they are compared to us heathens.
Something like this would look good:

1706518021924.png
(I think this is a night gown)

1706518045739.png

Prairie dresses can look so much better than what her kids got, I'm not knowledgeable about sewing techniques but they look low effort. Even the play princess dress Kelly Lenza made for her daughter looked better.
 
Something like this would look good:

View attachment 5675697
(I think this is a night gown)

View attachment 5675698

Prairie dresses can look so much better than what her kids got, I'm not knowledgeable about sewing techniques but they look low effort. Even the play princess dress Kelly Lenza made for her daughter looked better.
These are beautiful, but they show too much cleavage for Jill, she would make the girls wear a mismatched t-shirt under them.

And these would most likely be out of Jill's area of expertise, there's a ton of detail in them, with the ruffled trim, puffed sleeves, tucks, lace inserts and trim.
 
Am I too paranoid if I think it's probably a bad idea to dress her daughters with the clothes some random guy from Australia allegedly sent? He might be a pervert considering what's known about the usual audience for family channels on youtube and instagram. Although she might be lying and she actually got them from a charity or bought them herself.
 
Am I too paranoid if I think it's probably a bad idea to dress her daughters with the clothes some random guy from Australia allegedly sent? He might be a pervert considering what's known about the usual audience for family channels on youtube and instagram. Although she might be lying and she actually got them from a charity or bought them herself.
No, I think some fundie lady follower felt bad for the girls and sent them clothing.
I believe that's a huge part of Jill's grift, make the kids looks as frail and shabby as she can, that brings in more donations.
 
Am I too paranoid if I think it's probably a bad idea to dress her daughters with the clothes some random guy from Australia allegedly sent? He might be a pervert considering what's known about the usual audience for family channels on youtube and instagram. Although she might be lying and she actually got them from a charity or bought them herself.
As long as the clothes are clean and undamaged, I don't see a problem.
 
Imagine if the kids collectively snap and all take care of Mommy Dearest and Shrek, it'd be like Gypsy-Rose Blanchard crossed with Murder on the Orient Express.
I'd donate to their legal fund.

Kids who murder their abusive parents deserve medals of honor, not prison sentences.
 
I'd donate to their legal fund.

Kids who murder their abusive parents deserve medals of honor, not prison sentences.

In Germany (there for sure, possibly other Euro countries), family-related accidents or tragedies have a sort of judicial discretion that can be exercised. Got some press at one point when a dad accidentally backed over his toddler with the car.

Anyway, for horrible accidents like that that are clearly actually accidents, or in cases of severe abuse or battering where victim kills abuser, the system has an option to say “the worst thing that can happen to you has already happened, you’re punished enough.”

There will be a charge and process, some kind of bureaucracy, but in these cases, people are allowed to essentially plead out and receive intensive counseling and treatment rather than incarceration, and it is less “bad” on someone’s record than a crime.

I think it’s a good compromise for cases of kids or women killing abusers, if they are in danger from the person.
 
In Germany (there for sure, possibly other Euro countries), family-related accidents or tragedies have a sort of judicial discretion that can be exercised. Got some press at one point when a dad accidentally backed over his toddler with the car.

Anyway, for horrible accidents like that that are clearly actually accidents, or in cases of severe abuse or battering where victim kills abuser, the system has an option to say “the worst thing that can happen to you has already happened, you’re punished enough.”

There will be a charge and process, some kind of bureaucracy, but in these cases, people are allowed to essentially plead out and receive intensive counseling and treatment rather than incarceration, and it is less “bad” on someone’s record than a crime.

I think it’s a good compromise for cases of kids or women killing abusers, if they are in danger from the person.
Unfortunately that's not the case in burgerland. People who kill their abusers, including kids, almost always serve prison time. Hell, there was a girl who was a victim of child sex trafficking who killed a pedo who paid to rape her who was locked up until there was enough outcry to free her (and the brilliant minds in A&H defended her being locked up for killing a chomo).

Kids in the US are more or less seen as property of their parents, who can do whatever they want to them (especially in conservative areas). That's why the state of Ohio is more than happy to let Jill and Shrek starve and do God only knows what else to their kids. But heaven forbid kids fight back against their abusers.
 
Unfortunately that's not the case in burgerland. People who kill their abusers, including kids, almost always serve prison time. Hell, there was a girl who was a victim of child sex trafficking who killed a pedo who paid to rape her who was locked up until there was enough outcry to free her (and the brilliant minds in A&H defended her being locked up for killing a chomo).

Kids in the US are more or less seen as property of their parents, who can do whatever they want to them (especially in conservative areas). That's why the state of Ohio is more than happy to let Jill and Shrek starve and do God only knows what else to their kids. But heaven forbid kids fight back against their abusers.

I think a lot of it comes down to history and culture. Germany had a reckoning after the Holocaust, and part of “never again” meant preventing families from isolating and radicalizing their kids. Personal freedoms take a backseat with that extreme of a background of horrors. You actually can’t homeschool in Germany without extensive checks and a medical or psych reason to. Fundies would hate that.

America though? Personal freedoms all the way. I’d take a little more societal support and a functioning safety net over the ability to always do whatever the fuck I want. Hard to feel free when you’re always struggling with medical bills and etc.
 
Unfortunately that's not the case in burgerland. People who kill their abusers, including kids, almost always serve prison time. Hell, there was a girl who was a victim of child sex trafficking who killed a pedo who paid to rape her who was locked up until there was enough outcry to free her (and the brilliant minds in A&H defended her being locked up for killing a chomo).
Eh, call me a paleoconservative but murder is a crime. I'm not saying that abuse by the victim towards the perpetrator shouldn't be taken into consideration during sentencing, but that doesn't mean it's a good idea to let convicted murderers walk free without very, very strong restrictions and scaffolding in place to ensure that they don't try to do it again or rub people's faces it.
 
Eh, call me a paleoconservative but murder is a crime. I'm not saying that abuse by the victim towards the perpetrator shouldn't be taken into consideration during sentencing, but that doesn't mean it's a good idea to let convicted murderers walk free without very, very strong restrictions and scaffolding in place to ensure that they don't try to do it again or rub people's faces it.
Plus after all of the concessions courts make in these cases, defendants usually aren't serving anywhere near the max sentence. I.e. murder will get downgraded to manslaughter, a lot of the sentence will be probated and then they'll be released early for good behavior.
 
Eh, call me a paleoconservative but murder is a crime. I'm not saying that abuse by the victim towards the perpetrator shouldn't be taken into consideration during sentencing, but that doesn't mean it's a good idea to let convicted murderers walk free without very, very strong restrictions and scaffolding in place to ensure that they don't try to do it again or rub people's faces it.
People who kill their abusers deserve medals, not prison sentences. It's not murder, it's doing the world a favor.
I think a lot of it comes down to history and culture. Germany had a reckoning after the Holocaust, and part of “never again” meant preventing families from isolating and radicalizing their kids. Personal freedoms take a backseat with that extreme of a background of horrors. You actually can’t homeschool in Germany without extensive checks and a medical or psych reason to. Fundies would hate that.

America though? Personal freedoms all the way. I’d take a little more societal support and a functioning safety net over the ability to always do whatever the fuck I want. Hard to feel free when you’re always struggling with medical bills and etc.
Desire to isolate and radicalize their kids is exactly why people like the Rods homeschool, plus keeping them away from mandated reporters. There's basically no regulations for homeschooling in most of the US, even though it's led to all kinds of horrific shit. Muh parental rights is apparently more important than kids being safe and being taught how to read and write.

I know the US is one of the only countries that didn't ratify a UN treaty on the rights of children. The idea that kids are their parents property instead of people runs deep.
 
Last edited:
Eh, call me a paleoconservative but murder is a crime. I'm not saying that abuse by the victim towards the perpetrator shouldn't be taken into consideration during sentencing, but that doesn't mean it's a good idea to let convicted murderers walk free without very, very strong restrictions and scaffolding in place to ensure that they don't try to do it again or rub people's faces it.

As someone with a criminology background I wholeheartedly disagree. Crime is nuanced. The US is insanely hard on certain crimes while being insanely lenient in other areas, and they are a damn mess when it comes to murder trials.

I think intense counselling and perhaps some supervision to help integrate an abused child who killed their parent is far more appropriate than jail time. Obviously cases need to be examined with extreme care and by experts in the field of the psychology of child abuse, but it should be an option. America does love letting the rich and pretty guilty skate free and punishing other people inappropriately though, hence the insane overpopulation in prisons why simultaneously giving slaps on the wrists for dangerous criminal behaviour.

If someone killed Jill I don’t think they’d get much pity. People would think she was just a poor godly woman doing her best, probably. They’re starving because she’s poor! She loves them so much on social media! They always praise her parenting! They never have bruises!
 
If someone killed Jill I don’t think they’d get much pity. People would think she was just a poor godly woman doing her best, probably. They’re starving because she’s poor! She loves them so much on social media! They always praise her parenting! They never have bruises!
It probably depends on where it would be tried, but I think there's a good chance people would salivate at the chance to find out all the ways this nice church lady was a liar and abuser. People love that shit (including us, which is why we're here!)
 
Back