I wonder if the court is holding off on ruling on anything in the hope the drooling retard does ignore the upcoming deadlines.
I guess the scheduling issue is probably moot. Russ said that he'd do it by the 8th (and I presume Null would have complained by now if he didn't).
The motion to stay has been fully briefed, and then some; I suppose the court could be intentionally waiting to make a ruling on that. Also it's a more meaty question than most of the other frivolous garbage that's on the docket, so it may take more time for the court to draft its order.
However there's also the issue of Russell not knowing how to properly serve the defendants; it's been raised and responded to, so the court could issue an order. How difficult is it to tell the retard he's supposed to cc in the attorney for defendants when he sends the email to file his documents (instead of
after he gets the reply from the clerk saying that they've been filed).
Then too there's the objection to the filing of multiple reply briefs; the court
could rule on that. Even if it withholds ruling on the actual motion, it could let us know whether it is going to allow its order to be informed by the "memorandum of support" or whether it's inclined to strike/disregard anything.
I guess the issue of the mailing address has not been fully briefed; Russ hasn't responded yet. I imagine it will
probably be moot, as I would hope he's bright enough to figure out how to correct it before the court has to order him to do so.