Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 55 11.9%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 154 33.4%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.3%

  • Total voters
    461
In a way, isn't it a waste of time and money for Hardin to argue this shit with Russell in Utah when Null's hoping this will go to the Supreme Court, or at least Florida?

Sure, letting Russ run his mouth and pointing out all his history and flaws helps turn this judge against him, but does it really matter if this judge won't be deciding the case anyways?
 
In a way, isn't it a waste of time and money for Hardin to argue this shit with Russell in Utah when Null's hoping this will go to the Supreme Court, or at least Florida?

Sure, letting Russ run his mouth and pointing out all his history and flaws helps turn this judge against him, but does it really matter if this judge won't be deciding the case anyways?
you can't base your legal strategy on the assumption that the case will go to florida or scotus before that actually happens
if you go with the "fuck whatever happens here, we'll see you in the higher court / in another juristiction!" approach, and then scotus declines to hear your case and the utah judge decides to keep the case in utah, then you've just ruined your case for nothing
 
I’m surprised we haven’t had any new filings from Russ this week. I wonder if the DJF queers finally told him to stop filing so much bullshit back to back because it was hurting his case.
He’s waiting til the last day to write his next batch of filings
 
Or he's assumed the judge is overwhelmed by the quality of such arguments as "Last judge F'd up" and "My former lawyers aren't answering my texts, so clearly they'll be back any day now," so he must have his 90 days already...
Clearly. With such astute legal reasoning as "The Defendant is being frivolous by not agreeing to settle for what I am demanding", Russ can't but expect everything to do go his way.
 
He’s waiting til the last day to write his next batch of filings
Last day of what? He already missed a deadline and has an emergency motion open. I don't think there's anything to do until the court resolves those issues.

He might file more supplemental sperging about random emails, but he's not going to file anything to move forward until the court slaps him down or gives him that undeserved 90 day break.
 
Last day of what? He already missed a deadline and has an emergency motion open. I don't think there's anything to do until the court resolves those issues.

He might file more supplemental sperging about random emails, but he's not going to file anything to move forward until the court slaps him down or gives him that undeserved 90 day break.
He's still on the clock to respond to the defendants motions. Especially that Rule 19 motion. He could have his case dismissed with Prejudice if he ignores that one.
 
Last day of what? He already missed a deadline and has an emergency motion open. I don't think there's anything to do until the court resolves those issues.

He might file more supplemental sperging about random emails, but he's not going to file anything to move forward until the court slaps him down or gives him that undeserved 90 day break.
When has not having anything to do but wait on the court ever stopped Russel from filing more stuff?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neetorino
Last day of what? He already missed a deadline and has an emergency motion open. I don't think there's anything to do until the court resolves those issues.
Unless Russell's emergency motion to stay is granted before his deadline to respond, he's currently got until the 29th to respond to several of the slew of filings, and the day after to respond to the rest of them.

But the court currently has not dealt with Null's notice (Feb 1st) informing it that Russ hasn't met the deadline to propose a schedule; Russell's response to that (Feb 2nd); Russell's motion to stay (Feb 7th); any of the notices of erroneous/incorrect certificates of service (Feb 7th & 8th); Russell's responses to such (Feb 7th & 8th); Null's opposition to the stay and supplemental authority (Feb 7th & 8th); Russell's "memorandum in support" and his "reply" to Null's response to the motion to stay (Feb 8th); Null's objection to Russell arguing in multiple filings to reply to the response (Feb 8th); Russell's response to that objection (Feb 9th); and, finally, the issue that Null has raised of Russell's mailing address being invalid (Feb 10th).

It'd sure be helpful if the court would start addressing at least some of this slew of garbage. But if it doesn't, Russ had sure better not blow off the deadlines he's got coming up. Ignoring those would be borderline suicidal for his case.
And shouldn’t any supplemental filings complaining about “harassing emails” be stricken from the record? Because literally what does being called a “Pipsqueak Ratmouth” have to do with a copyright infringement case?
Yes, they should. :optimistic:

But I don't believe there's been any request for jury trial, and if it's a bench trial the judge will probably just say "well I am a highly intelligent judge and I know better than to be influenced by improper evidence. There's no reason to strike it".
 
It'd sure be helpful if the court would start addressing at least some of this slew of garbage. But if it doesn't, Russ had sure better not blow off the deadlines he's got coming up. Ignoring those would be borderline suicidal for his case.
I wonder if the court is holding off on ruling on anything in the hope the drooling retard does ignore the upcoming deadlines.
 
I wonder if the court is holding off on ruling on anything in the hope the drooling retard does ignore the upcoming deadlines.
I guess the scheduling issue is probably moot. Russ said that he'd do it by the 8th (and I presume Null would have complained by now if he didn't).

The motion to stay has been fully briefed, and then some; I suppose the court could be intentionally waiting to make a ruling on that. Also it's a more meaty question than most of the other frivolous garbage that's on the docket, so it may take more time for the court to draft its order.

However there's also the issue of Russell not knowing how to properly serve the defendants; it's been raised and responded to, so the court could issue an order. How difficult is it to tell the retard he's supposed to cc in the attorney for defendants when he sends the email to file his documents (instead of after he gets the reply from the clerk saying that they've been filed).

Then too there's the objection to the filing of multiple reply briefs; the court could rule on that. Even if it withholds ruling on the actual motion, it could let us know whether it is going to allow its order to be informed by the "memorandum of support" or whether it's inclined to strike/disregard anything.

I guess the issue of the mailing address has not been fully briefed; Russ hasn't responded yet. I imagine it will probably be moot, as I would hope he's bright enough to figure out how to correct it before the court has to order him to do so.
 
Can one submit a filing like this with profanity and insults against the Judge and not be penalised by the court?
The judge is likely to ignore anything leveled at him. Insults against the court and other unrelated parties are more likely to get action.

The judge needs to seem impartial so he’ll water the ducks back on a lot of things.
 
Not entirely. It closes off a potential avenue for Russ to claim he wasn't properly served.

What if they change locks on his PO box to trunk clockwise instead of anti-clockwise? As a government employee himself, thr judge must understand that the ADA was enacted to help people, and this could qualify as government interference in his case. How could have know they changed it? He is thus entitled to 100 more days so that it is fair.

And shouldn’t any supplemental filings complaining about “harassing emails” be stricken from the record? Because literally what does being called a “Pipsqueak Ratmouth” have to do with a copyright infringement case?

Never ask Russ that because he is all to ready to EXPLAIN.

Russ is a top cow because he ALWAYS produces quality content, even if the lag between lunacies is longish. They never stop amd are fueled and spurred onwards by the very fires of Hell. I'd put Fatrick up there, and I am tentatively adding BMJ, but I don't know how long a human body can take that much cocaine.
 
Back