Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    463
Well you see, if he gave his ACTUAL address, then those darn dirty trolls on Kiwi Farms would know where he lives! He HAS to give a fake address for his servicing guys!
It's a fucking rent-a-fake-po-box shit; completely useless.

Russ is too damn stupid (not brain damaged, nothing indicates he actually is a drooling retard, just looks like one) to realize that a USPS postal box has actual legal significance and protection, something from maleboxes etc may lack.

Also I declare this animals rise up page, niggers without animal avatars can gtfo
 
Evidence that Russell isn't reading this thread yet. If he was, he'd have known three weeks ago that he'd provided the wrong address to the court.
He'd also have known about the fundraiser much earlier. I don't think his fragile ego allows him to read here; at least not for extended periods. Look how much he seethes over being called a "Pipsqueak". Can you imagine how difficult it would be for him get through even one or two posts here? Especially the ones with creative Russell-themed avatars like mine.
 
Evidence that Russell isn't reading this thread yet. If he was, he'd have known three weeks ago that he'd provided the wrong address to the court.
I thought he commented something that implied he was reading the thread. But apparently it was a troll sending him an email. I wonder if he had actually opened the email he would have found the troll told him he got the wrong address.
2024-02-12_09-04.png
(Document 76, page 9)
 
Note to Russell:

in this case, on 2/8, a judge tossed a suit (with leave to replead, sad) because the lawyer/ plaintiff's amended complaint for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, tortious interference with a business relationship and cyberstalking, against a blogger who posted video of this lawyer being a complete ogre to his wife and children and then encouraged people to contact his firm to get him fired, was "replete with unnecessary commentary."
[The judge] said the suit was “far longer than it needs [to] be,” and it contained “numerous allegations that appear to have little to nothing to do with the legal claims asserted.” Many of the allegations “are replete with unnecessary commentary,” the judge said.

The 110-page amended complaint appears “intended for a broader public audience,” Wetherell said. “For example, the first six pages of the amended complaint contain a slanted narrative about the ‘nature of the action,’ which reads more like a magazine article than allegations in a legal pleading.”
"The court understands that plaintiff feels that he has been wronged by defendant (and, if the allegations in the amended complaint are true, he may very well have been), but the amended complaint is not the place for plaintiff to tell his entire side of the story or to air salacious details about [the lawyer's wife] from the matrimonial proceeding,” Wetherell said. “Thus, the amended complaint needs to be repled to eliminate the extensive extraneous factual allegations.”
Be grateful you're in Bumfuck, Russ.

(Lol, the complete tool of a plaintiff (Kasenoff) in the case above filed a 110-page complaint. Hell hath no fury like a fired litigator (or a one-time junior paralegal) scorned.)


 
He’s a fuck-up but I don’t for a second think he fucked anything up on purpose. He’s just an idiot who thinks he’s smart, those types of people fuck shit up all the time.
I choose to believe he did so maliciously. He knows people look at him and assume he's developmentally disabled as well as ugly as a smashed leech; he uses his disability like a shield all the time.
Why not both? He isn't nearly as smart as he thinks he is but he also uses his condition as a shield. Falling into that pattern of "Your Honor I'm really retarded" is not a bad strategy as it somewhat worked for Ralph. Greer has the extra benefit of looking the part.

This strategy allows one to get special treatment you might not normally get. Normally any bureaucratic system tries to treat everyone exactly the same. But there are a couple of strategies that people sometimes use in order to get special treatment. This is part of the reason women, in general, are so excellent at dealing with bureaucracy because they are pleasant to be around and so bureaucrats are inclined to help them. Russ's strategy of being extremely retarded is another one that can work.

The thing is though this special treatment has been a detriment to Russ. It means he demands special treatment at all times instead of being normal and is therefore unable to deal with slight inconveniences. It means he knows he can act retarded and generally get away with it.

This means Russ will forever be chasing the high of having his case be successful that he felt around the 10th circuit. This is why he wants to hire those specific two lawyers who represented him before. He doesn't understand why he is failing right now and is trying to do anything to make things like the old days.
 
The funny thing is, I know when I got mine they gave me a piece of paper with the address and PMB/Suite number written on it in the proper format. So I'm not sure how you screw it up.
When I opened up a PO box, the e-mail confirmation I received listed both the box number I'd be receiving and the properly-formatted address to give out and put on address labels.

Russ is a burger short of a Happy Meal 🍔 🍟 , so we have no idea whether his bungled version of the address came from a poor sense of direction, incorrect transcription, or a more nefarious reason (with him, any or all are possible). Even if the court simply shrugs this off as yet another pro se case woe, it's still good for laughs from people following the thread because it's pathetic when people can't write their correct address on correspondence that matters.

There is something special about Hardin's filings always starting with "NOW COME the Defendants" and Russel's filings always being something new each time.
At the risk of stating the obvious, I believe this is the standard/boilerplate way of opening a brief submitted by the defense. Sauce: I've seen this in other legal documents. Russ is not the legal genius he thinks he is, and he seems to lack the skill to properly cut and paste or create templates that would make brief-writing a lot quicker, convenient, and easier for him. That's probably the main reason his legal documents are inconsistent word salad 🥗. It also doesn't help his writing skills seem below average.
 
View attachment 5710023
Tldr, "I did not violate court rules, because oopsy woopsie, I have now changed the name of my document"
View attachment 5710029
View attachment 5710031
As an aside, Local Rule DUCivR 7-1 (C) that he cites has him in violation of part (a), and it does not allow any arguments. He violated it, therefore, in two ways
View attachment 5710044

If he already missed the deadline, that doesn't help. It would stay further deadlines, though, that he is not yet in breach of.

Probably, though given that I don't know how British laws work, I would then instead not recommend making such book there without consulting a barrister or whatever.

Jesus - legal work is ALL about nit-picking you drooling moron. In order for courts to be fair and accurate, they depend on properly written and filed pleadings. This isn’t fucking Kindergarten where you can just write “Kiwi Farms are poopyheads” after eating your glue sticks.

No wonder you can’t get a job in a legal office. You’re an idiot.
 
I wonder - I have to believe that if we (a gaggle of uneducated retards and a few likely even dumber idiots that passed the bar) get great amusement from this, that the actual law office of Hardin (and let’s be real, probably the court and judge) have to be enjoying each filing.

Image years and years (lawyers and even judges can end up specializing in nearly identical cases) of the same shit, and then you get this. Each filing is new, each unforced error is completely novel.
There's always an element of "does the undertaker cry at the funeral?" when someone being an idiot creates more work in a case where you know the client is good for it. When it's your own client being an idiot, or having a half-hour screaming session over the phone because their family situation is incredibly dysfunctional and that has legal consequences that aren't what they'd like, though, even that hourly billable rate doesn't feel worth it.
 
Why not both? He isn't nearly as smart as he thinks he is but he also uses his condition as a shield.
Well of course he tries to manipulate, that was never in dispute - he’s just really really bad at it, and I don’t think he intends to be bad at it.
 
I'm not entirely convinced that Russhole deliberately screwed up his address for service. Would a raging narcissist like Russ really make himself look foolish on purpose?

I know he has some unorthodox legal tactics and that he's gone through several decks of disability cards in his time, but all I see is Occam and Hanlon comparing their respective razors.
 
I'm not entirely convinced that Russhole deliberately screwed up his address for service. Would a raging narcissist like Russ really make himself look foolish on purpose?

I know he has some unorthodox legal tactics and that he's gone through several decks of disability cards in his time, but all I see is Occam and Hanlon comparing their respective razors.
Its also meaningless. The most the Court is going to do is order him to fix the address on his future filings. And then warn him for the third time he's not allowed to relitigated closed causes of actions, or brining up new causes of action in supplemental reply briefs. Before strike the replies from the record and telling Russel he's getting his 90 day stay to find an attorney.
 
Its also meaningless. The most the Court is going to do is order him to fix the address on his future filings. And then warn him for the third time he's not allowed to relitigated closed causes of actions, or brining up new causes of action in supplemental reply briefs. Before strike the replies from the record and telling Russel he's getting his 90 day stay to find an attorney.
How long until he submits something lika a motion to suck his balls?
1707779155978.png
 

Attachments

I wonder - I have to believe that if we (a gaggle of uneducated retards and a few likely even dumber idiots that passed the bar) get great amusement from this, that the actual law office of Hardin (and let’s be real, probably the court and judge) have to be enjoying each filing.

Image years and years (lawyers and even judges can end up specializing in nearly identical cases) of the same shit, and then you get this. Each filing is new, each unforced error is completely novel.

It's funny in hindsight when you're looking back on it several years later, or when it happens to someone else at your law firm and you just get the water cooler rundown of events, but having to actually be the person to deal with this kind of shit gets old in a hurry. A judge might enjoy smacking around a lawyer that's done something completely stupid, but there's an expectation that they'll fix their filing. With Russ it doesn't matter how many times you point out that he's done something wrong and that it doesn't work that way, because he's incapable of learning and will just keep wasting your time over and over again.

If I were a judge that had this in my court I'd have Russ tested by a vet in the hope that the results might not come back as human and I could just shitcan the entire lawsuit or at least offer some respite from the endless barrage of idiocy. I don't know if Josh/Hardin have asked the court to find Russ as a vexatious litigant, but after this latest shitshow, I think the court might be more amenable to such an argument just to avoid having its own time wasted with more of this shit.
 
Back