Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

Dreams (the kind you have when you sleep, not goals and aspirations) is one of the most inane, least interesting topics to talk about, along with what happened at work and astrology. Guess what women talk about the most?
The unconscious mind can unravel many hidden truths through dreams, friend.
Astrology and esoteric dream talk are the least of woman's problems as far as I'm concerned.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Night Raiders
If you aren't convinced of just how much legislation is made to favor women's sexuality, check out what they tried to do in Feminist Headquarters:

Direct link: https://youtube.com/watch?v=WcuarfqJIRo
I remember a Swedish journalist making an article a long time ago to this effect. He discovered that ethiopians had a travel agency that helped people scam the Swedish welfare state. The agency told people to go the EU and burn all id's to pretend to by a syrian refugee. Once they were granted refugee status and permanent residence, they would move back to their own shithole country while still receiving welfare checks. This infuriated the journalist as his wife was Asian and he was still trying to get her residency through legitimate methods despite it taking a long time with push back from the government.

Swedish feminism in general is batshit insanity. Muslim feminists will take off their hijabs to protest, Swedish feminists will put it on to protest. Not sure if the woman still works in the board of immigration, but there was a woman who openly supported muslim extremism on her social media while handling immigration cases. Although I will say that some incidents in Sweden of women lunacy may not even be from Swedish women.
 
NOOOOO you can't say that! Womenorinos are all actually le heckin wholesome tradwives that are super racist and would gladly shit out 12 babies if only moids would step up and stop watching porn. Women would never support censorship and open borders!!!! This is actually moids' fault because... well.. umm... because they made women feel uncomfortable on right wing websites, so they were forced to become leftist instead, yeah! And if you disagree you're a tranny who goons to loli.
Don't you know you have to be super inclusive and feminist on right wing sites? If you don't then you're the reason women vote for illegal gibs and giving gays access to kids. Oh, what's that? You disagree? Well then stop being a loser incel gooner!
 
View attachment 5713372
Women in general are more likely to oppose free speech 😢
c14bc63e25cca08e64271a84e0b9e5d8.jpg
"Alright folks, and the final question of today's Fat Faggot Bus Tour Quiz is... What's the biggest difference between these two demographic groups?"
sss.png
ssssa.png
"You might be thinking 'Gee Pat, that's an easy one, women don't fart in your wife's vagina' or maybe 'You don't grind women into pepperoni in your basement,' but that would be wrong in every detail as always, passenger. The most notable difference between the two is that niggers got voting rights 50 years before foids did!"
Thatswild.gif
 
View attachment 5715392
"Alright folks, and the final question of today's Fat Faggot Bus Tour Quiz is... What's the biggest difference between these two demographic groups?"
View attachment 5715389
View attachment 5715390
"You might be thinking 'Gee Pat, that's an easy one, women don't fart in your wife's vagina' or maybe 'You don't grind women into pepperoni in your basement,' but that would be wrong in every detail as always, passenger. The most notable difference between the two is that niggers got voting rights 50 years before foids did!"
View attachment 5715416
I wonder how this is men's fault?
 
Literally what they hate is that men found a hack to make them instantly high value, because having low value men to shit on gives them a way to appear higher worth themselves. They need men to reject so they can flex about their options to their other girlbosses. And then once these men have a hot, skinny foreign babe around their arm, a 'backwards' one that doesn't reflect their values, they instantly become high value, so there's this odd sense of missing out. They HATE that these men are going overseas and getting women hotter than them, while they can't get their Chad to stick around. They cannot handle that shit, dude
Of course they cannot, it's a method of escaping a non-beneficial arrangement for many men, and it instantly reduces women's negotiating power. Less desperate men = Less options for women all around. Women and women-worshiping men HATE perhaps more than anything women who lean into and satisfy traditional male wants in a woman (things like chastity, loyalty, submission, being kind), this is a good part of the reason for hating passport bros and most of the reason for hating the so called "pick-me" .

Almost every time I've seen a "pick-me" mentioned, it's a woman espousing or behaving in a traditional womanly way in relation to men, even in conservative circles! Whether you think them honest or not surely you want people to propagate this opinion if you're a person of traditional values, if people are adopting your views for social cred that's a sign of winning.

But no, they hate it. And it's because it destroys the pressure chamber, men love women, men want to have wives and kids, on some level they need to have them it's not optional. Which means if you can form a significantly sized chunk of women(most women) and they all agree to behave a certain way you can get a catch-22 where men are just kind of forced to accept that as the new standard. Women still get to have husbands and kids, but they now don't have to hold themselves to the same standards as before, enjoy new luxuries, more hedonistic pursuits, more obedient husbands ect. Defectors, scabs if you want to be humorous are hated because they are poking holes in that and once a certain threshold is reached the dam can no longer hold, individual women upping their attractiveness by being traditional is going to beat the appeal of a community of women lowering all of their attractiveness together and you're gonna have to go along if you want to keep up.

It's interesting in general how women publicly (mostly unmarried or unhappily married, "unowned" women effectively) have this sense of community or common investments that men are lacking, though on a smaller scale their friendships are less tight and loyal than men's.

That being said I do not wish for some odd HAPA evolutionarily escape and hope white men collectively can come to their senses, transform society, restrain women's agency and in doing so make everyone happier.
 
It's interesting in general how women publicly (mostly unmarried or unhappily married, "unowned" women effectively) have this sense of community or common investments that men are lacking, though on a smaller scale their friendships are less tight and loyal than men's.
No, it's not. It's not interesting at all. Outside of secret societies, women do not really allow men, through the legal and economic sphere, to have men's only spaces. It's no longer politically correct.

The red pill explains all of this coherently, neatly, compatibly with science and human behavior... but it does not conform to western expectations or desires. I used to laugh at the red pill as a conditioned response (oh, I'm a shitlord, but not one of those guys...) but you have to see it to believe it.

Women compare their partners vs. the partners of other women and their friends, and with social media they'll just keep monkeybranching. It's not going to stop until we identify the problems in women, instead of having worthless simps insist it's always men's fault because gasp a woman/women might disapprove of what you say?
That being said I do not wish for some odd HAPA evolutionarily escape and hope white men collectively can come to their senses, transform society, restrain women's agency and in doing so make everyone happier.
Other than passing laws women will resist, the balls in women's court, and it's not going to change. The simps are gonna keep demanding men change in hopes their weak noodle dicks impress these women, who will lightly praise them while looking past them at the man who makes them feel sexually charged. You can tell who is experienced with women by how they think women operate--if they think the "just be a nice guy" story is true, they're full of shit. Women say that shit because they have absolutely no idea what they want or why they ever feel what they feel, and it's hilarious anyone believes the women that advise this shit when anyone who has dated a woman knows women play games and never say what they really want anyway because they think you should guess.

Imagine looking human history and the men women have historically found attractive and flocked to, and then advising "just be a nice dude :)"

That being said I do not wish for some odd HAPA evolutionarily escape and hope white men collectively can come to their senses, transform society, restrain women's agency and in doing so make everyone happier.
Sorry dude, but white women dropped the ball. Hapa is the way of the future.
 
The sign is a subtle joke. The shop is called "Sneed's Feed & Seed", where feed and seed both end in the sound "-eed", thus rhyming with the name of the owner, Sneed. The sign says that the shop was "Formerly Chuck's", implying that the two words beginning with "F" and "S" would have ended with "-uck", rhyming with "Chuck". So, when Chuck owned the shop, it would have been called "Chuck's Fuck and Suck".
 
The problem with feminism is that it's not about equal rights anymore, but about equal outcomes instead.
A woman with no talent should improve or fail, it's not about patriarchy but about jealousy.
Everybody needs a natural enemy, if people just get handed over success and access to better jobs, it's determined that other groups will feel oppressed too and use that victim mindset for profit.
Also, sCieNcE is crooked and abused to pander to soyboys with fake studies about vaccines and climate change, instead of solving the problems that come with the children vs. career dilemma.
 
The problem with feminism is that it's not about equal rights anymore, but about equal outcomes instead.
A woman with no talent should improve or fail, it's not about patriarchy but about jealousy.
Everybody needs a natural enemy, if people just get handed over success and access to better jobs, it's determined that other groups will feel oppressed too and use that victim mindset for profit.
Also, sCieNcE is crooked and abused to pander to soyboys with fake studies about vaccines and climate change, instead of solving the problems that come with the children vs. career dilemma.
You can't have equality because you'll just get what we have now. Women have a strong in-group preference, much stronger than men. Men also generally go out of their way to try and please women whenever comfortable. When you mix this with 'equality' you get women rising to the top despite being sub par, then going out of their way to exclude and remove men from any and all institutions.
 
Point to stress:

Everyone knows they don't know themselves. Hell, how often do women talk about needing to "find themselves?"

Yet they are always extremely confident and universal in their dating advice, the brain-dead obvious (and only true in a very misleading fashion) "just be funny and a nice guy."

As a man, I doubt I could tell you what truly attracts me to a woman and (as a guy) everyone knows you can end up falling for someone who you thought was totally outside your criteria or standards or whatever.

And the way they deliver the advice is always so... it's either snarky, like when women do the really dumb and obvious thing they do when they're trying to shame you but their acting skills are never up to par, or matter-of-factly, like it's just, duh, obvious, like every Disney movie shows it this way, that's reality, dude, like a WOMAN is telling you this???"

The same women who laugh and say "women don't know what women want, LOL, we're fickle!" will then shame you into not buying the "blue pill" trope wholesale.

Men, are you really going to take dating advice from the sex that believes in horoscopes (while pretending not to when men ask)? Only a weak man would.

Women lie about this shit up with an absolutely straight face when convenient. I caught one women on the farms talking about performing natal charts on the girls' forum, so I made a snarky comment to them elsewhere about how they do that, and they straight up lied thinking I never saw the post. Some of the chumps here even on this forum, you can tell are inexperienced by how much they just completely trust women and they're shamed into it because they keep thinking about the women that would disapprove of them.

You'd think a forum full of Christians would understand what the story of Adam and Eve is trying to teach us.
 
Last edited:
Sorry dude, but white women dropped the ball. Hapa is the way of the future.
It depends on what's important to you I suppose. I want my kids to look like me and my ancestors, to feel a sense of belonging to a people. I don't want to curse them and break a line that's been in existence for uncountable years because it's easier to find a trad-wife if I'm willing to go for an Asian.

It's a useful scaring tool I guess, but white women fundamentally cannot drop the ball enough, that's the nature of being a woman. No matter how they fuck up, or how bad things get if you want to perpetuate your people you need them. It's a beautiful and terrible thing, for the relationship between men and women to be non-negotiable.

If those sorts of things are not important to you consider that you are passing the buck to future generations, you're sentencing your offspring to an ever worse position in a rapidly worsening world. It's not surprising that many hapa's(sons especially) feel a certain resentment towards white-people/their fathers.


The problem with feminism is that it's not about equal rights anymore, but about equal outcomes instead.
The problem with feminism is that the concept of equality is retarded and it's doubly retarded for two complementary but different types of beings.
 
Of course they cannot, it's a method of escaping a non-beneficial arrangement for many men, and it instantly reduces women's negotiating power. Less desperate men = Less options for women all around. Women and women-worshiping men HATE perhaps more than anything women who lean into and satisfy traditional male wants in a woman (things like chastity, loyalty, submission, being kind), this is a good part of the reason for hating passport bros and most of the reason for hating the so called "pick-me" .
And it's the exact same shit when you date someone outside of the acceptable age range they've assigned to you. I'm not talking about under-18 or some shit like that, I'm talking about "person in 30s dates person in 20s? Unacceptable!" The whole "she might be being taken advantage of!" is a thin smokescreen at best, it's because women believe that men are honor-bound to only ever date within 5 or so years of themselves. A man dating younger is a breach of these rules and what's worse, it's competition for them. I always think it's just so adorable that women will smugly tell you "Well I'm sorry that you don't want to compete with other men" when they literally use social pressure to assure that their competition is inaccessible to you. Because in their minds men are supposed to beat each other to death over a croomb of pussy, and women are supposed to be sought after and worshiped. And of course men are expected to adhere to this invisible honor code, but all of the invisible factors that slant the dating market in women's favor must be silently dealt with and tolerated, and you aren't allowed to complain. Online dating is legal and acceptable, divorce courts are legal and acceptable, HR departments that make inter-office dating impossible are legal and acceptable, paternity fraud is acceptable and marginally illegal(although virtually never prosecuted). It's like some CEO gallivanting around and bragging how hard he worked and how much blood, sweat and tears he put in when the reality is the only reason he made it is because a maze of hidden government regulations designed to be as coddling to people like him as possible.
 
Women in general are more likely to oppose free speech 😢
https://www.holyrood.com/inside-pol...-deliver-better-outcomes-for-rape-complainers
If you feel like getting angry at something right now, there are unironic proposals to have juryless trials for rape. Women are incapable of clear, logical thought. They cannot understand the importance of core institutions that we have in place for the functioning of society (freedom of speech, right to a jury trial, etc.). If something makes them feel a little safer, then they support it.
Women are literal children, they consider their comfort to be more important than fundamental legal rights established for millennia.
 
It depends on what's important to you I suppose. I want my kids to look like me and my ancestors, to feel a sense of belonging to a people
I highly doubt that there will be any sense of belonging left.
If you feel like getting angry at something right now, there are unironic proposals to have juryless trials for rap
I find that funny, since jury trials favour female victims. A manipulative crying young female on the stand has a lot of advantages and is more difficult to effectively cross examinate when she is lying since the lawyer easily comes off as a bully for the jury.
 
You can't have equality because you'll just get what we have now. Women have a strong in-group preference, much stronger than men. Men also generally go out of their way to try and please women whenever comfortable. When you mix this with 'equality' you get women rising to the top despite being sub par, then going out of their way to exclude and remove men from any and all institutions.

Both men and women act illogical, every sex has it's own flaws and troons are the embodiment of what incels think a woman is like, as well as pick-mes the other way around. They are trying to appeal to what they think a man is while neglecting that each man is individual.
While western culture has pushed female thinking too far, the muslim world is what happens when you accelerate male flaws to an over the top level.
In the modern times instead of focussing on progress and logical thinking, humanity drives into hysteria and zealotry like in the dark age.
 
It depends on what's important to you I suppose. I want my kids to look like me and my ancestors, to feel a sense of belonging to a people. I don't want to curse them and break a line that's been in existence for uncountable years because it's easier to find a trad-wife if I'm willing to go for an Asian.
If enough people have happas, they can form an entire subculture by themselfes.
As for the "line" thinking: Thats tiresome, because it is so obviously wrong. It's not a line, it's a tree, in which you are but a single leaf. You have more than enough siblings and cousins of several degrees to cary on any legacy you think is so important. And if they also don't, then it's probably a higher machination working you're powerless against anyway (the WEF).

You should'nt weight on that metric anyway, though. Do you have a sweetheart you truly care for? Cool. Who cares what race she is? Don't let Internet craziness get to your head.

If those sorts of things are not important to you consider that you are passing the buck to future generations, you're sentencing your offspring to an ever worse position in a rapidly worsening world. It's not surprising that many hapa's(sons especially) feel a certain resentment towards white-people/their fathers.
It's the whiteys people grow increasingly hostile against. Happa kids may be in a better position than pure whites.
Of course, the best way to prevent harm against your kids is to not have any.
 
If enough people have happas, they can form an entire subculture by themselfes.
As for the "line" thinking: Thats tiresome, because it is so obviously wrong. It's not a line, it's a tree, in which you are but a single leaf. You have more than enough siblings and cousins of several degrees to cary on any legacy you think is so important. And if they also don't, then it's probably a higher machination working you're powerless against anyway (the WEF).

That's convenient thinking to deny responsibility to carry on what's been handed over to you. There are lines in a "tree" and you are deracinating yourself from you culture and abandoning that "tree" if you effectively jump ship to a different race/mixed-race. Uncountable "leaves" on that tree died btw, some without leaving progeny at all to defend a people I'm a part off(this is true for most everyone), if I want to honor them higher machinations or whatever is not a valid excuse.

George Soros's Asian 10/10 honeypot women he's certain to be sending to my doorstep any day now will have to relent.

If enough people have happas, they can form an entire subculture by themselfes.
They already do, checkout reddit lol. It's not about "subcultures", this is not about being a goth, or a dnd nerd or something, it's not about something as trivial as how you dress or a funny accent or something. It's about an ethnicity/race with a rich history, a specific way of being and a group identity. You can't get that by just bunching up together based on not having it in the first place.

You should'nt weight on that metric anyway, though. Do you have a sweetheart you truly care for? Cool. Who cares what race she is? Don't let Internet craziness get to your head.
I care what race she is, that's what I've been saying this entire time no? Why shouldn't someone weigh in on that metric, it's pretty important to consider, people consider way more trivial things when looking for partners so I don't think the racial makeup of your offspring is something beneath consideration lol.
Also there is a differentiation between wanting something and something being the right thing to do. "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law" is one of the cancers of the modern age.

I mean for something purported to be from internet crazies, it's funny how every single western culture had these standards and beliefs throughout history until about 50-ish years ago.
It's the whiteys people grow increasingly hostile against. Happa kids may be in a better position than pure whites.
Of course, the best way to prevent harm against your kids is to not have any.
They hate us cause they ain't us. The resentment they have against us is in no small part jealousy, and I'm not about to pluck an eye out to please the blind.
 
Back