Law Australia to ban doxxing after pro-Palestinian activists publish information about hundreds of Jews

Australia to ban doxxing after pro-Palestinian activists publish information about hundreds of Jews

1707866280474.png

Australia’s Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus leaves the house of representatives at Parliament House in Canberra, Tuesday, Feb. 13, 2024. The Australian government said on Tuesday it will outlaw doxxing – the malicious release online of personal or identifying information without the subject’s permission – after pro-Palestinian activists published personal details of hundreds of Jewish people in Australia.(Mick Tsikas/AAP Image via AP)

MELBOURNE, Australia (AP) — The Australian government said on Tuesday it will outlaw doxxing — the malicious release online of personal or identifying information without the subject’s permission — after pro-Palestinian activists published personal details of hundreds of Jewish people in Australia.

Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus said the proposed laws, which have yet to be drafted, would involve issuing take-down notices to social media platforms and imposing fines for the intimidation tactic.

The government was responding to Nine Entertainment news reports last week that pro-Palestinian activists had published the names, images, professions and social media accounts of Jewish people working in academia and the creative industries.

Pro-Palestinian activists distributed a nearly 900-page transcript that leaked from a private WhatsApp formed last year by Jewish writers, artists, musicians and academics, newspapers reported last week. The transcript was accompanied by a spreadsheet that contained the names and other personal details of almost 600 people, purportedly the group’s membership.

OTHER WORLD NEWS

Author Clementine Ford, who was one of several activists who posted links to the leaked information, said that it shouldn’t be considered doxxing.

“This chat demonstrated extremely organised moves to punish Palestinian activists and their allies,” Ford posted on Instagram.

Dreyfus said the new laws would strength Australian protections against hate speech, but provided scant detail about how they would work.

“The increasing use of online platforms to harm people through practices like doxxing, the malicious release of their personal information without their permission, is a deeply disturbing development,” Dreyfus, who is Jewish, told reporters.

“The recent targeting of members of the Australian Jewish community through those practices like doxxing was shocking but, sadly, this is far from being an isolated incident,” Dreyfus added.

There has been an increase in reports of antisemitism in Australia since Israel’s war against Hamas began in October.

The Australian government’s online safety watchdog defines doxxing, which is also known as “dropping dox” or documents, as the “intentional online exposure of an individual’s identity, private information or personal details without their consent.”

Asked for his definition, Dreyfus said doxing was the “malicious release, publicly, of personal information of people without their consent.”

“We live in a vibrant multicultural community which we should strive to protect,” Dreyfus said.

The government’s plan to outlaw doxxing was welcomed by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, which represents Australia’s Jewish community.

“We look forward to working with the government to ensure the full extent of the harm caused is understood and that the new laws effectively protect Australians from this shameful and dangerous practice,” council president Daniel Aghion said.

Monash University cybersecurity expert Nigel Phair applauded the idea of a law against doxxing, but questioned how it could be enforced.

“It’s really difficult for policing agencies to police such laws when, really, they just don’t get the access to the data. Really, it’s the social media companies who bear the responsibility,” Phair told the Australian Broadcasting Corp.

“Our law enforcement agencies, dare I say, are already swamped with online investigations with the amount of crime that we have online. Adding this to it without any additional resources and the really integrated work with the social media platforms — it just won’t do much,” Phair added.

(+)
Source : https://apnews.com/article/australia-doxxing-law-jewish-palestinian-b8af51cfdf3d29a994036e99fe3c55df
 
If only jewish organisations were this concerned with matters of free speech, or autonomy during the covid time, when Australian people were thrown into prison camps.

“We live in a vibrant multicultural community which we should strive to protect,” Dreyfus said.
Or immigration resistance.

---

Though the publishing of this dox is obviously intended to allow deranged muzzies to drive their cars into their houses or things like that, so in general I do think it's good that something is done to outlaw it.

This chat demonstrated extremely organized moves to punish Palestinian activists and their allies

Any details? What did the jews post about Palestinians? Muzzies, like jews, aren't typically known to give an honest account of a situation, so I wonder if this is exaggerated bluster, or if the jews did post something quite heinous and similarly aggressive online.
 
Last edited:
Personal or identifying information?

Well I suppose someone's name is both personal and identifying and speaking it is releasing it so will saying 'hi John Smith' be classed as doxxing?

I don't get how Aussies are so laid back and get such a hysterical shrieking bunch of politicians
 
Though the publishing of this dox is obviously intended to allow deranged muzzies to drive their cars into their houses or things like that, so in general I do think it's good that something is done to outlaw it.
That is similar reasoning used by gun control advocates.

Unless there is violence happening against the kind of folks who encouraged doxing against their enemies.

This law was basically made since they didn't like being on the receiving end.
 
Nah. The word "malicious" appears four times in that short article. Only meany mcbeanies need fear the pure unadulterated justice of the Australian legal system.
How fast do you think the online white pages will qualify? Get real, this shit always starts with the hardcases, then inevitably slides into whoever the government chooses.
Seems pretty malicious for the online white pages to publish personal information for ad revenue.
 
How the fuck can you ban doxxing? All you're doing is finding information that is already publicly, legally accessible and compiling it in one place. How can that be a crime?

It can only be reasonably criminalized if the information were obtained through illegal means, which is already a crime - called "hacking" and "identity theft". Otherwise you're essentially calling for banning the fucking Yellow Pages.
 
Back