He’s probably right honestly. It’s why the attempt to change how people view norms start young
Can you imagine a leftist taking accountability and truthfully conceding on an issue? It'd be like dividing by zero. I don't think we've actually seen what happens when one clearly admits to their friends/fans that they've been wrong about something. Brains would certainly pop.
I'll give you that. I saw the reddit screencaps and they were lamenting that it's now too hard to run defense for Vaush being a pedophile rather than lamenting that their communist messiah turned out to be a pedophile. His fanbase is intellectually dishonest and morally bankrupt with their priorities clearly ass-backwards, judging from their own words.
I think there is a combination of nature and nurture: some aspects of sexuality are biological. IIRC, Vaush thinks it is all nurture?
Reminder. YouTube automatically subscribes users to random channels. That number is small based on statistics alone. Others are likely dead accounts. The majority that are active have to be clocking around the 300k range, or lower. That's not including the 8000+ that have already left, but more than likely he's actually gained subs.
I would imagine the instinct to collect comes from the fact that any pedoshit content online is likely to not be there forever, its illegality also leads to the existence of trading rings where you have to give a picture or a video to get one, much like the celebrity nude trading ring that exploded when the fappening happened. Think like how p2p filesharing used to work back in the day with music/warez but for nonces.
In autistic and blatant sincerity, loli is probably the closest to "ethically sourced" CP, because nobody was actually hurt in making it, only potentially hurt several years down the road when someone gets hooked on it and progresses to actual CP or CSA. I sure as hell don't consider it "ethical" because of the ramifications of normalizing pedophilia, but it's the closest answer to that question from an objective standpoint.
Except most artists use reference pictures... There's a whole documentary about victims recognizing themselves in cartoon depictions of their very real abuse.
Ah yes, the famous "Toddler who looks 18" defense. That's sure to work.
That I did not know. I knew Guillermo got caught doing that for babyfur art, but it never occurred to me that the japs use reference models for their weird ass art. If that's the case, then there's no concessions or half-pardons. Crucifixes for everyone.
This is a result of the JCS criminal interrogation culture on YouTube. People have seen how police interrogations work on television and they assume that if they act a certain way then they get away with whatever. Despite the existence of the fifth amendment, people still believe they have the capacity to use their words to trick trained police officers into believing their lies.
