Why do people think Rowling is some man-hater just because she doesn't like AGPs? She is clearly happily married with several children. Of course the abuse of her ex-husband influenced her to speak out against the current lunacy and to advocate for the safety of women, but she never showed any general hatred for men as a whole.
I've only been curious on the matter. I don't personally have anything against Rowling. It's just a lot of her decisions over the years have contributed to a lot of her detractors.
Because she promotes women's rights and even donated money to female-supporting causes. Obviously only a twisted irrational manhater who's probably on her period would do stuff like that.
My family had always gone to Disney, but ever since Universal brought in Harry Potter and the extra cash flow allowed them to step up their game and clean up their parks, we've decided to start going there instead. I absolutely agree, Universal would have been dead in the water without Harry Potter and it was because J.K. Rowling is so passionate about her creation that the land became so successful. There is absolutely no way she would ever sell it off.
Considering how she regularly portrayed the Ministry even before the Death Eaters took over, probably.
Rowling recognizes that people who rise up the ranks of government officials are largely useless, self-interested fuckheads. Based.
True, but it's this mindset that the story tends to come short when even lightly scrutinized. When only Hermione (Rowling herself) is in charge, then everything is hunky dory. The "right people", if you will. Considering the colossal failure that was both the previous Tory and Labour governments, she could stand to be a little more impartial.
I haven't read the Strike books but I thought the show was a pretty good mystery drama with the kind of ongoing character development you'd expect from her if you read Potter. I imagine JK is more involved with Strike than HP since it's her own production company making it. These days the cast is getting long in the tooth, if they do more series it should really be more than once every two years. Is book 6 the one with unhinged tranny as the villain I heard about when it was published?
If Rowling purchased the rights to Sonic (or whatever the trannies' favorite media empire is) she would go from Queen TERF to Goddess TERF. TERFs should invade tranny spaces the same way that trannies invade women's spaces.
They’d be on 41% watch if she bought the rights to Steven Universe and Splatoon.
It's always funny when troons and other fags think Harry Potter is just going to magically lose all of its popularity. It may no longer be popular in their little cluster of degenerates, but it's still the seventh highest grossing media franchise of all time. Shit is here to stay, no matter how much they complain and bitch about it.
It's really funny. Troubled blood has a killer who happens to put on women's clothing as a disguise, but he's not a troon at all. Just a dude wearing a disguise. Troons flipped their shit. Meanwhile, The Silkworm has an honest to goodness troon in it, who is a fucking borderline horrorshow. You'd think the trannies would have flipped out about that, but maybe they didn't mind that one since they just thought it was normal. As always, troons are mentally defective.
I don't think so but I believe it is the one where the victim got accused of, amongst other things, transphobia by an online mob.
Nibba it only took you ten or so posts but you’re finally getting to the point you’re trying to make. Have my two cents:
“.