Why do we put so much stock into loli/underaged characters as a direct link to being a pedo?

Just FYI, because "scary drawings" have been mentioned loli IS already illegal in several parts of the world. To produce, to access and to retain.

Mostly saying this because it's interesting how this is debated as "should this be illegal" when several authorities make no distinction between it and cheese pizza.

Quite rightly, I should add. If you, unfortunately, do the Earth the dishonor of siring a child you'll quickly understand why parents enter a state of bloodthirsty frenzy at the thought of a nonce being in the vicinity.

OP I admire your persistence, but arguing for a tone down on what remains the ultimate evil for most normies is...A choice.

You totally do sound like a nonce BTW.
 
Dude I know this is hard to conceive, but I don't want to look at toddlers and hear about them getting raped when talking about the latest episode of a new anime that's perfectly fine. Most people don't. They do it anyway and it shuts down all conversation on the thread, because then they spam loli. I've seen it. It's horrible.
I'm sure there are nice (well moderated) anime communities where people can behave and not post loli content, but expecting that from a chan is...optimistic to say the least. Likewise I wouldn't expect anything except the most depraved furry content on a chan, so I wouldn't bother even trying to have a conversation on such a site.
 
I'm sure there are nice (well moderated) anime communities where people can behave and not post loli content, but expecting that from a chan is...optimistic to say the least. Likewise I wouldn't expect anything except the most depraved furry content on a chan, so I wouldn't bother even trying to have a conversation on such a site.
What I'm saying is pedophiles will tell you they're pedophiles when they think they can get away with it. Yes a chan board is a bit extreme. It still happens. It's why I've moved all my anime talk to the farms. I don't have to deal with that awful shit. But it did teach me at least some of them are fucking retards with no self awareness.
 
I love how one of the Lolicons in this thread deleted his post after getting clowned on by Josh
I'm pretty sure that was Josh himself, at first it looked like he got banned, because quite a few posts were missing, and when you clicked on his name in replies, it went to page not found. Josh was mad I think, rightfully
 
Didn't Null once say that all the people posting loli on 9chan (and 8chan) were the same people posting actual CP? Every. Fucking. Time.

I've yet to see a solid argument for why people SHOULDN'T just assume these things are one and the same. Just because drawn images don't involve a real child, why the fuck is it any better when it literally depicts children in acts that shouldn't even be thought of let alone conveyed through images? There's only one reason these images are being created in the first place. You don't need to be 180+ IQ to figure out why people jack it to Lolicon.

Ultimately if you are sexually attracted to the image of children, no matter in what context, you have a serious fucking problem.
Perhaps you may not go out to do harm to a child, maybe you're not a true and honest pedophile yet... But at the very least you should tune your coomer fueled brain to something different for a while and do something else with your life because there does come point that if crossed, there's no turning back.

The video game analogy makes no sense because video games were almost always accepted as a regular thing, IT'S NOT PORN. It's a form of entertainment that 99% of the time does NOT involve you masturbating. Am I wrong here? Or is playing video games with both hands actually incorrect? I don't know many stable people spanking the wank to Mario or Call of Duty.

"Video games makes kids violent" was a misguided attempt to protect children, sure I think that only karens and helicopter moms actually fell for it but let's face it, there's plenty of things that can corrupt children and video games is perhaps the least harmful thing given the over abundance of pornography and other inappropriate things that a child may access on the Internet...

But how does that work for loli shit? Something that a child should absolutely NOT be seeing... Sexual images depicting children is NOT something anyone should be trying to normalize. There are non violent video games, there is no non pedophile lolicon. There is under no circumstances a scenario where lolicon is normal or justified. You are either a pedophile or not a pedophile. All the faggots who were arguing for "virtuous pedophiles" a few years back were pedophiles trying to groom the environment to get more social acceptance... SO THEY COULD DIDDLE CHILDREN.
Alarm bells ring in my head any time I hear about some wannabe intellectual try to defend this topic under some weird mental gymnastics "well it depends on the child" sort of way. Please just kill yourself if you think that there's even a discussion to be had here.

TLDR: Behead all pedophiles, I for one couldn't give a shit if they're jacking it to drawn pictures only, it's disgusting and it really should be questioned why you are defending it. It's really suspicious that the people who seem to defend lolicon also seem to be consuming it in abundance.
 
The video game analogy makes no sense because video games were almost always accepted as a regular thing, IT'S NOT PORN. It's a form of entertainment that 99% of the time does NOT involve you masturbating. Am I wrong here? Or is playing video games with both hands actually incorrect? I don't know many stable people spanking the wank to Mario or Call of Duty.

"Video games makes kids violent" was a misguided attempt to protect children, sure I think that only karens and helicopter moms actually fell for it but let's face it, there's plenty of things that can corrupt children and video games is perhaps the least harmful thing given the over abundance of pornography and other inappropriate things that a child may access on the Internet...

But how does that work for loli shit? Something that a child should absolutely NOT be seeing... Sexual images depicting children is NOT something anyone should be trying to normalize. There are non violent video games, there is no non pedophile lolicon. There is under no circumstances a scenario where lolicon is normal or justified. You are either a pedophile or not a pedophile. All the faggots who were arguing for "virtuous pedophiles" a few years back were pedophiles trying to groom the environment to get more social acceptance... SO THEY COULD DIDDLE CHILDREN.
Alarm bells ring in my head any time I hear about some wannabe intellectual try to defend this topic under some weird mental gymnastics "well it depends on the child" sort of way. Please just kill yourself if you think that there's even a discussion to be had here.

TLDR: Behead all pedophiles, I for one couldn't give a shit if they're jacking it to drawn pictures only, it's disgusting and it really should be questioned why you are defending it. It's really suspicious that the people who seem to defend lolicon also seem to be consuming it in abundance
The video game thing is retarded. You can go your entire life without killing someone. But going your entire life without sex or masturbation? That... is a feat.

So when you add depictions of children into the most base urge a human has, it WILL fuck them up. If they weren't a pedophile at the start, it isn't a long fall at that point to become one. Eventually the drawings will become dull, and you'll seek out harder images. Real children in videos. Then actually going out and molesting a child.
I'm going to take a break on this as to not spread any more negativity. To sum up my point, fiction is not reality. It can certainly be icky though.
This thread will go on with or without you. Point noted.
 
Eventually the drawings will become dull, and you'll seek out harder images. Real children in videos. Then actually going out and molesting a child.
It's well known at this point what chronic porn consumption can do to someone with near unlimited access. I'm not going to debate the ethics of wanking because that's gay. But watching hot bitches on the Internet, or some otherwise vanilla smut is a hell of a lot more normal than squeezing the tube to lolicon. And I don't think that many people will find themselves just hopping straight on to that shit without excessively frying their dopamine receptors to the point where the normal stuff doesn't already do it for them.
100% agree with you there.
 
It's well known at this point what chronic porn consumption can do to someone with near unlimited access. I'm not going to debate the ethics of wanking because that's gay. But watching hot bitches on the Internet, or some otherwise vanilla smut is a hell of a lot more normal than squeezing the tube to lolicon. And I don't think that many people will find themselves just hopping straight on to that shit without excessively frying their dopamine receptors to the point where the normal stuff doesn't already do it for them.
100% agree with you there.
Very much agree. To get to the point where you get hard to loli means you have had a massive porn addiction for years. Probably since you were a child and found smut on dad's PC. Normal sex doesn't phase you. Gangbangs make you yawn. You are fried like that drug egg psa from the 80s. Inherently, you are disgusting, and can't shut up about how your lolis are sexy because of how warped you are.
 
people who play violent video games or watch action movies enjoy it because it triggers the pleasure centers of the brain associated with violence in a manner that hurts nobody. If you get a dopamine rush from playing Call of Duty, you must want to go do a mass shooting

I put this into any other context and it seems like crazy talk.
In violent video games you have enemies that are shooting at you or attacking you, as well as usually having other objectives to do, so it's not just "mindless mass murder simulator" like you guys always think it is.

As opposed to lolicon were the only objective is to get aroused by children or people who are deliberately made to look like children.
 
Autistic or not, human minds are like play-doh. They can be molded with differing thoughts and it can result in a different brain between time to time. Exposing yourself to any kind of erotic material to children is basically inflicting rot onto it. It can be suppressed for a while, but at some point, you will only think about how fucking children is the only thing you can think about all day.
 
I respect OP for being so willing to put his reputation on the line to ask this kind of question, but the fact it was posed to begin with is a little strange.
The issue is the fantasy. If you're imagining fucking kids, you're a pedophile. You don't have to touch an actual kid to be a pedo, it's a mental deficiency at its core.
 
I respect OP for being so willing to put his reputation on the line to ask this kind of question, but the fact it was posed to begin with is a little strange.
The issue is the fantasy. If you're imagining fucking kids, you're a pedophile. You don't have to touch an actual kid to be a pedo, it's a mental deficiency at its core.
I think any deprived animal who's on the verge of losing their mind is going to think about fucking a child to survive.
 
God I love how this post turned into every other discussion post on this website. "Fuck troons and libtards, fuck xyz" nah man im sorry FUCK PEDOPHILES WHO LOOK AT LOLLI. That's the discussion here. People keep trying to bring all their other moral faggory into this when it has nothing to do with the discussion. You can have whatever opinion you want but all it does is derail the dog pile we should be having here against weirdos who look at drawings of kids being raped.
 
Obviously "lolis" aren't real and loli material isn't the same as actual CSAM but if you're masturbating to them on a regular basis and making a whole internet persona based off of them there is something seriously wrong with you.

If you jerk off to the depiction of children, you should frankly, be taken out back and shot. You are legitimately autistic if you assume people going "wow, you jerk off to... animated porn of this character? and shes... supposed to be 5? that makes you look like a pedophile." is defamation you banana eating ooga booga jiggaboo
It's even more nuts if you take into consideration how neotenous and overly idealized regular anime women look like in general
 
Back