Science Harvard professor says ‘all hell broke loose’ when his study found no racial bias in police shootings


A Harvard professor said that "all hell broke loose" and he was forced to go out in public with armed security after he published a study that found no evidence of racial bias in police shootings.

During a sit-down conversation with Bari Weiss of The Free Press, Harvard Economics Professor Roland Fryer discussed the fallout from a 2016 study he published on racial bias in Houston policing.

The study found that police were more than twice as likely to manhandle, beat or use some other kind of nonfatal force against blacks and Hispanics than against people of other races. However, the data also determined that officers were 23.8 percent less likely to shoot at blacks and 8.5 percent less likely to shoot at Hispanics than they were to shoot at whites.

When Fryer claimed the data showed "no racial differences in officer-involved shootings," he said, "all hell broke loose," and his life was upended.

Fryer received the first of many complaints and threats four minutes after publication.

"You're full of s—t," the sender said.

Fryer said people quickly "lost their minds" and some of his colleagues refused to believe the results after months of asking him not to print the data.

"I had colleagues take me to the side and say, 'Don't publish this. You'll ruin your career,'" Fryer revealed.

The world-renowned economist knew from comments by faculty that he was likely to garner backlash. Fryer admitted that he anticipated the results of the study would be different and would confirm suspicions of racial bias against minorities. When the results found no racial bias, Fryer hired eight new assistants and redid the study. The data came back the same.

After the report was published, Fryer lived under police protection for over a month. He had a seven-day-old daughter at the time and went shopping for diapers.

"I was going to the grocery store to get diapers with the armed guard. It was crazy. It was really, truly crazy," he said.

Fryer, who became the youngest tenured Black professor at Harvard at age 30, was suspended for two years from the university in 2019 after he allegedly engaged in "unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature. He continues to deny the allegations.

At the time, then-Harvard dean Claudine Gay claimed Fryer's research and conduct with other employees "exhibited a pattern of behavior" that failed to meet expectations within the community.

"The totality of these behaviors is a clear violation of institutional norms and a betrayal of the trust," she said.

Gay resigned from her position as Harvard president in early January after widespread plagiarism allegations and criticism of her testimony to Congress, where she failed to fully clarify whether calling for the genocide of Jews violates Harvard's policies against bullying and harassment.

Weiss, referencing Gay in her conversation with Fryer, asked him if he believes in karma.

"I hear it's a motherf---er," he replied.

Harvard did not return Fox News Digital's request for comment,
 
Claudine Gay claimed Fryer's research and conduct with other employees "exhibited a pattern of behavior" that failed to meet expectations within the community.
Aydin Paladin recently did a pretty thorough video on Gay: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xcr7WKKw_8c

tl;dw she summarizes the examples of plagiarism. Some of them are pretty bad. Then she goes through every paper Gay has published and summarizes it. Finally, she shows how all of Gay's work appears to be stolen from another black woman academic, who Gay actively suppressed.

It's pretty wild, but it's also echos a common theme with blacks in positions of power. (1) their whole life is a facade. They never really do anything. Did Lori Lightfoot in Chicago every actually accomplish anything (on purpose, I mean)? Has Fani Willis, the DA persecuting Trump, ever actually made a valid argument in court? Or does she get other people to the real work?

(2) it's a symptom of the "competency crisis" - our systems and institutions are currently only still moving because of their momentum. There's no longer anyone competent in positions of power or authority.
 
Shouldn't progressives be glad that there is no racial bias? It's basically what they've been asking for so why would they reject anything that confirms what they, in theory, should want to hear?
It's almost as if that they... have some kind of incentive to maintain the existence of a bias, be it real or not... nah, surely there's no profit or power to be gained by fanning the flames of racial tensions.
 
Niggers and spics getting beat up by cops more than whites is 100% explained by niggers and spics fighting cops more than whites. Niggers especially

Nearly all cases of "unarmed" niggers getting shot by cops involve the niggers trying to grab a cop's gun or mace or nightstick, or making a movement that any non-retard would acknowledge is indistinguishable from the motion of grabbing for a concealed gun when they were told don't move, etc.
 
Aydin Paladin recently did a pretty thorough video on Gay: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xcr7WKKw_8c

tl;dw she summarizes the examples of plagiarism. Some of them are pretty bad. Then she goes through every paper Gay has published and summarizes it. Finally, she shows how all of Gay's work appears to be stolen from another black woman academic, who Gay actively suppressed.

It's pretty wild, but it's also echos a common theme with blacks in positions of power. (1) their whole life is a facade. They never really do anything. Did Lori Lightfoot in Chicago every actually accomplish anything (on purpose, I mean)? Has Fani Willis, the DA persecuting Trump, ever actually made a valid argument in court? Or does she get other people to the real work?

(2) it's a symptom of the "competency crisis" - our systems and institutions are currently only still moving because of their momentum. There's no longer anyone competent in positions of power or authority.
It also doesn’t help that the same people who defended affirmative action policies to make it look as if they are progressive slowly walked back their statements only because of those same black academics and activists that were using anti-Jewish rhetoric.

In the case of Gay, they actually didn’t care about the fact that she plagiarized her own papers; they only made he resign because she dared say not so nice things about people of the Jewish faith.

The fact that it‘s blatant about how condescending it is just shows that these higher education facilities with Ivy League degrees have made indoctrination far more easy than ever before.
 
In the case of Gay, they actually didn’t care about the fact that she plagiarized her own papers; they only made he resign because she dared say not so nice things about people of the Jewish faith.
Pretty telling, isn't it. You can go years saying "kill all the white people" and your career will go straight to the moon. Then one day you slip up and say "maybe the jewish ethnostate is going a little too far" and you're right out.
 
Back