@Android Raptor Hate Thread

I almost forgot how much I detest this bitch for a minute, then she goes on a "porn for kids" defense spree, and I learn she condones gay fanfics involving kids, and teaching them about prostitution, and just all kinds of heinous shit.

Why are you like this.
Idk, why do you keep making shit up?

Bend over
 
I almost forgot how much I detest this bitch for a minute, then she goes on a "porn for kids" defense spree, and I learn she condones gay fanfics involving kids, and teaching them about prostitution, and just all kinds of heinous shit.

Why are you like this.
Context:
I don't think there's anything necessarily wrong with shipping same-sex pairings with child characters, since gay kids exist and get puppy love crushes just like straight ones. It's just that doing any sexual stuff involving child characters is pretty grody and you absolutely need to hide it behind a fuckton of content warnings.

I'm all for people doing whatever with fiction as long as it doesn't hurt real people, but some subject matter is stuff lots of people find gross or upsetting and needs a content warning. Sexualization of child characters is one of them.

It feels like there are sleazy Japanese loli/shota artists that do a better job of warning/hiding their gross shit than Neth does.

Doesn't Neth accuse anyone that tells her to cool it with her gross lolicon of being a homophobe?
Thats why I stick to drawn porn and fanfiction. No worry about accidentally jerking off to a trafficking victim with drawings of fictional mecha anime space nazis getting crammed full of dicks.

I think a lot of tradcels want to use porn existing as a scapegoat for why they can't get laid, when in reality it's their shit personalities. They don't actually give a shit about the real problems with the porn industry or w/e, they just want to blame being a gross misogynistic weirdo on having looked at porn so they don't have to accept they are the problem. An extreme version is Ted Bundy trying to blame porn for him raping and murdering a bunch of women and little girls (when he was just a sick fuck that would've probably done that shit regardless).
 
Context: this bitch said she likes gay space fascist cartoon characters crammed full of dick and there's nothing wrong with G-rated shipping content of minor characters (shota and loli still nasty AF)
 
Context: this bitch said she likes gay space fascist cartoon characters crammed full of dick and there's nothing wrong with G-rated shipping content of minor characters (shota and loli still nasty AF)
you absolutely need to hide it behind a fuckton of content warnings.
No worry about accidentally jerking off to a trafficking victim with drawings of fictional mecha anime space nazis getting crammed full of dicks.
Bro nice save pedophillia is okay behind content warnings and fanticising about children is also okay cuz muh no actual secks.
 
Yeah Raptor you're wrong on thinking just because children might have access to these inappropriate contents (it's porn, all of it is just mountains of porn), does not mean we should let it be available easily.
 
Your skirting over the point is hillarious by the way. But please keep going, pedo.
Just because I think they should have the right to do it doesn't mean I don't think it's still nasty AF
 
Yeah Raptor you're wrong on thinking just because children might have access to these inappropriate contents (it's porn, all of it is just mountains of porn), does not mean we should let it be available easily.
What do you mean it's totally normal some lesbian is obsessively going on about the lives of gay boys dating, and holding hands, and other weird shit. She's totally not a pedo though guys it isn't loli/shota/etc.

But both are still okay if not icky, just put a warning over those though.
Just because I think they should have the right to do it doesn't mean I don't think it's still nasty AF
You really think that's the fucking issue you coombrained fucking pedophile.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Android raptor
Yeah Raptor you're wrong on thinking just because children might have access to these inappropriate contents (it's porn, all of it is just mountains of porn), does not mean we should let it be available easily.
the current online safety bill would require ID verification for most sites, not just porn. It will never be just porn, because they don't actually give a fuck about protecting kids. It's just a good way to Trojan Horse internet censorship and surveillance

Again, this comic is like 2 decades old but remains evergreen
0a0b3211-ea89-400a-a528-7b3049817d99-m.jpg
 
Back