- Joined
- Mar 29, 2014
Why is there such a push in Current Year to deny the reality ofreplacing the gendered
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why is there such a push in Current Year to deny the reality ofreplacing the gendered
It makes me think of the people demanding Dilaudid but calling it "delala."Another "word" that's unfortunately becoming more popular; delulu.
This is the guy who tells you what "misinformation" is.Anytime I hear the phrase “misinformation” or “disinformation”, I find myself cringing because the cunts can never decide which one it is.
Malinformation is a new(er) one I've been hearing lately as well. It's all just faggoty double speak for "I don't like what was said, but I can't prove it was a lie/harmful"Anytime I hear the phrase “misinformation” or “disinformation”, I find myself cringing because the cunts can never decide which one it is.
It is an immediate red flag that the journalist using the word(s) is about to engage in a gaslight campaign. It lets me know their article is going to be “don’t trust your lying eyes” sort of deal.
The fact that they can’t say “lies” or “myths”, is also very telling. If you’re so confident that people are simply lying about whatever topic, then why not debunk said lies in your article instead of trying to gaslight people?
Not even just 'fictional'. I've seen people claim Joan of Arc is queer-coded because she refused to give up wearing men's clothes, despite her directly saying that she wore men's clothes to keep her purity (not get raped). It's happening to other historical figures too."Coded"
Stuff like black coded, asian coded, faggot coded and the likes. It just is modern day term to claim something for your cultural backgrounds with some having the most furthest reach possible.
Even more obnoxious when you just throwing obvious stereotype at whatever fictional character fits the bill and it's suppose to be only the flattering aspects of them.
Anyone who uses "delulu" must be delusional.Another "word" that's unfortunately becoming more popular; delulu.
It's delusional, you troglodytes.
Whenever I see the word "privilege" being bandied about in a SJW context, it makes me believe the speaker lacks a logically or emotionally persuasive argument and has instead chosen to make an ad hominem attack by claiming the opposite side has some sort of mystical or nonsensical quality that makes them evil, undesirable, etc."privilege"
Be it "white privilege", "male privilege", or some other BS "privilege", that SJW notion of "privilege" assumes 2 delusions. First, that it's somehow still America with Jim Crow laws and no "second wave feminism".