Vaush / @VaushV / VaushVidya / IrishLaddie / Ian Anthony Kochinski - Horse Cock Enthusiast, Larpy Violent Revolutionary, Sex Pest, in his 100th pedo scandal

The longer the video, the more guilt he harbours. He has jacked off 6113 times to lolicon horse cock rape, once for each second of this video. Retard has too much misguided "ackchyually" pride in being able to talk his way out of this that he doesn’t realise his optimal move is simply shutting the fuck up and ignoring it.
 
Vaush and the Illuminati conspired to delay these events until Q1 2024 in order to spoil my 2023 prediction card.

1708297609434.png
 
Context: Vaush is a porn addict with a disturbing fixation on horses and kids.

This has been known for years. Only difference between this drama is that he got caught live and in context were he can't claim "jokes".
No explanation for the geckos on his dick ???

I genuinely want an explanation for this its like WTF???!
 
One thing unbearable about the video is that, the problem to Ian isn't that the porn looked like children, and had horses. But, that it was because it was labelled loli, and "never knew" it was children, until after. So his issue isn't they looked like children, it was that they were too young in their lore.


So, he would 110% fuck a 2000 year old dragon god that looks exactly like a 12 year old if given the chance. Which pretty much explains Vuash and his problems with loli porn pretty clearly.


The only questions now is how low can he go in terms of porn, this isn't his worse stuff, only recent porn he fapped too.

No explanation for the geckos on his dick ???

It's not mentioned at all,


Edit: spellering
 
Okay finished watching it

The first 75% or so is him defending the old clips. A few of these he was able to put up an okay defense for (like the Mr. Girl one because he was able to surround it with context of Mr. Girl sounding even more pedophilic than him). Most of them he just defended by claiming that he was an edgy debate bro trying to make the most extreme analogies for shock value.

Then he got to the "taxes" folder part, his excuse here was that he was gooning too hard and too fast saving images left and right and all he could see in his coombrain was the big dicks and he didn't even notice and/or consider that the women in the pictures seemed underage when he saved them. He also claims that he didn't get off to these images regularly and that's why they were still in the "to be sorted folder", he just dumped them there and never looked at them again. His defense is clearly relying on the fact that most watching aren't going to ever see the images.

Then he ends with an apology for his community for being such a hard person to defend, instructs them to stop trying to defend him on this issue and instead just link this video, and bans ironic memes about the incident from his community

Basically I don't know how he could have put up a better defense here given the terrible circumstances, but I don't think this video is going to change anybody's mind
 
Last edited:
The video can be summarized as such:

1. Vaush started his career trying to be a bombastic debatebro and he deeply regrets all his stupid arguments and they torment him every single day.
2. Vaush only saved the lolicon because he loves big dicks. The lolicon made the penises look bigger in comparison and that is what he enjoyed.
3. There is absolutely no mention of the bestiality at all and he doesn't even mention the horses in the lolicon folder.
 
>nearly 2 hour fucking long response
Well, boys thats it for vaush's career. he will still stream to his fanbase but I highly doubt others will cross over with him bc if you are going to refute shit then make it short and concise
My dad gave me some good advice that’s served me well my entire life. It’s led to a lot of success. Goes a little something like this:

“If somebody can’t explain something to you in 5 minutes, they don’t know what they’re talking about or they are lying to you. Nothing on this planet takes more than 5 minutes to explain in a simple way that most people can grasp.”

Vaush, if you can’t explain in 5 minutes why you aren’t a pedophile, which is the easiest thing to explain in 5 minutes and it may be the easiest, you are a pedophile. If there’s 2 HOURS of nuanced context to explain how you’re not a pedophile that doesn’t really address how you’re not a pedophile, you are a pedophile.
 
Back