US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Fair enough, it's just that after talking with a history nut that is a buddy of mine, the whole buffer states motive seemed like the most obvious to me with the constant encroaching from the West to influence Ukraine.
I don't get that because there's zero benefit to invading Russia. Russia would have to have some unique resource that's important for manufacturing some technology or medicine to justify a ground invasion, and even then there would be easier, less bloody ways of getting it. What's in Russia that anyone would want to march a generation of young men into a slaughterhouse to get?
 
I don't get that because there's zero benefit to invading Russia. Russia would have to have some unique resource that's important for manufacturing some technology or medicine to justify a ground invasion, and even then there would be easier, less bloody ways of getting it. What's in Russia that anyone would want to march a generation of young men into a slaughterhouse to get?
Beats me, but for some reason every world superpower of its time is chomping at the bit to have a tussle with the bear. Germany in 1941, France in 1812, Sweden in 1707, Poland in 1610, Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in 1508, etc, etc. You noticed an emerging pattern yet?

And all of them came through what is now Ukraine, too.
 
Last edited:
That is some spicy shit... got any receipts for that one? Would love to share with some Catholics I know
I search some more in my old ass email file on anything to do with Catholics, I have two.

01.png02.png
I'll dig in my hole abit more, I know for a fact there is alot more spicy shit when it came to the "catholic spring".
 
The whole soviet block was the most secure the Russians ever were, the iron curtain was some ideological war it was practical security policy and that lasted for what? 1945 to 1992? so less than 50 years.
Failure on my part, I should have said USSR defensive doctrine. Putin is very much from a time where that was policy and seems to very much believe in it.
I don't get that because there's zero benefit to invading Russia. Russia would have to have some unique resource that's important for manufacturing some technology or medicine to justify a ground invasion, and even then there would be easier, less bloody ways of getting it. What's in Russia that anyone would want to march a generation of young men into a slaughterhouse to get?
I'd wager healthy paranoia. Sometimes you don't do things because they make sense as much as because they make you feel "safe". Having what was an ally, go to neutral and being turned into hostiles is not something that one would enjoy, specially in a territory that open so many venues of assault like Ukraine opens up.

Also, the US international strategy can only be classified as "erratic", the saber rattling from Hillary about blocking airspace before she lost was probably a bit of an eye opener in that maybe live and let live was not on the table as much as expected. Basically, 2014 would have made me dubious, Hillary basically soft declaring hostilities would have put me on high alert and I can only imagine there were multiple indicators before that anyway.

One could argue that having that land buffer is fucking irrelevant with how war can work nowadays, specially if your opponent just wants to destroy and doesn't particularly care about consolidating landmass and territory (because lets not kid ourselves, if Russia didn't care about preserving infrastructure in Ukraine I would expect things to have gone very different).
 
Germany in 1941, France in 1812, Sweden in 1707, Poland in 1610, Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth in 1508, etc, etc. You noticed an emerging pattern yet?
I'm assuming there were logical reasons behind those invasions, like with Germany it was a land grab for more Germans (however logical you deem that to be.)

With the other ones, I'm assuming there was some much desired resource involved like land or precious metals? Something having to do with material gain, certainly.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: The Nothingness
I'm assuming there were logical reasons behind those invasions, like with Germany it was a land grab for more Germans (however logical you deem that to be.)

With the other ones, I'm assuming there was some much desired resource involved like land or precious metals? Something having to do with material gain, certainly.
Sure were. For example, Napoleon's armies marched into Russia in 1812 in an attempt to force Tsar Alexander I to cease trading with Britain. And burned Moscow to cinders.
 
I'm assuming there were logical reasons behind those invasions, like with Germany it was a land grab for more Germans (however logical you deem that to be.)

With the other ones, I'm assuming there was some much desired resource involved like land or precious metals? Something having to do with material gain, certainly.
I know France invaded to get Russia to comply with the embargo against Britain.

The embargo was hurting the Russian economy as their main export at the time was wood and Britain and the British Royal Navy was Russia's number one buyer. Napoleon's blunder wasn't invading Russia in the winter but not seeing that all he had to do was become the number one buyer of Russian wood and build his own navy that he always wanted to make to finally take the fight to the British on the sea.
 
Last edited:
You do when connecting to incompatible networks.
TCP-IP is not an "incompatible network" (neither is UDP)
The protocols for financial processing are now built on top of tcp-ip or UDP, which means its impelmented at the application level like bit torrent or VOIP.
Btw, how many sock puppets do you have you petty little troll?
 
Last edited:
I should've realized sooner that there was no point in arguing with a tech illiterate
Also, the US international strategy can only be classified as "erratic", the saber rattling from Hillary about blocking airspace before she lost was probably a bit of an eye opener in that maybe live and let live was not on the table as much as expected. Basically, 2014 would have made me dubious, Hillary basically soft declaring hostilities would have put me on high alert and I can only imagine there were multiple indicators before that anyway.
America has basically openly admitted that they would abandon their friends at a moments notice and declare random countries enemies and attack them just for electing a government America doesn't agree with. If you view their actions objectively, it's a hostile nation worse then nazi Germany by several orders of magnitude. the next world war may just have most nations united in fighting against America
 
California has a larger population of Trump voters than any other state.
Again the issue is specifically LA and SFniggers, absolutely no one wants them, and they're the retards moving into texas and enacting gayops. Not the majority, but it only takes a handful.

It's the same fucking play, every time and it is aggravating no one is doing anything to stop them.

Step 5 is apparently lacing fent in drugs btw.
 
Again the issue is specifically LA and SFniggers, absolutely no one wants them, and they're the retards moving into texas and enacting gayops
Commies are not going to leave their commie utopias where their commie leaders enact their commie agenda to move next to smelly MAGAts and live under their policies.
I know this because I have people like this in my family.
People whose camp rule where they live have zero reason to leave.
 
Commies are not going to leave their commie utopias where their commie leaders enact their commie agenda to move next to smelly MAGAts and live under their policies.
I know this because I have people like this in my family.
People whose camp rule where they live have zero reason to leave.
Aside from telling me how shit I'm seeing first hand isn't real is fucking hillarious. You're really surprised commies are running from the consequences of their actions? lmfao.
 
The aggregate data proves you wrong.
I've linked it a dozen times in A&H and you keep spewing this bullshit.
You're huffing just as many of your own farts as a San Francisco faggot
So do you not get how the population size of two cities isn't the entire fucking state or did arguing like a retard about tech make you brain damaged.

Your inane ramblings about aggregates to me is also funny, you wouldn't get it - since you apparently can't fucking read. But it really is.
 
So do you not get how the population size of two cities isn't the entire fucking state..
Without people fleeing commies in blue states, we'd be discussing senator O'rourke of Texas right now, because Texan natives don't know how fucking commie Democrats are.

or did arguing like a retard about tech make you brain damaged.
Are you a redditor?
I don't care how many trash cans I get, I'm fucking right and they're fucking wrong.

Btw, enjoy a couple trash cans since that seems to be what you're about here.
 
Without people fleeing commies in blue states, we'd be discussing senator O'rourke of Texas right now, because Texan natives don't know how fucking commie Democrats are.
Uh huh sure, have you tried reading yet instead of sperging about shit I don't give a shit about.

Are you a redditor?
I don't care how many trash cans I get, I'm fucking right and they're fucking wrong.

Btw, enjoy a couple trash cans since that seems to be what you're about here.
Oh no negative stickers I'm so sad :(
Have fun screaming about how right and smart you are you tech-illiterate baboon.

I'd suggest taking a break from the internet but you're just going to pull out a study about anger or something and pretend it's proof doubling down works or some shit because your uncle told you.
 
my understanding is that the commies are in denial about California being horrible with the people who wake up and realize how toxic it is end up moving out. Providing they don't move to a bughive they get introduced to a higher evolved society and realize just how bad things have been in their "utopias"

also:
One of the reasons behind the totally opposite opinions of experts is complexity and high costs of the joining procedure for becoming an SPFS member. From the organizational point of view the process is well oiled; formation of the relevant agreement takes 2 to 3 weeks. However, experience has proven that it is implementation of technical regulations that becomes a problem, specifically, installation of the Terminal and connection to the bank network.

SPFS developers claimed that for transmitting messages via their system it would be possible to use standard procedures for exporting journal entries from the Automated Banking System (ABS) (UFEBS). http://www.cbr.ru/psystem/files/UFEBS_2016_1_0.pdf, but in practice in order to support new formats ABS requires some follow-up tweaking. On average, it took ABS development companies about six months to integrate with SPFS, whereas some developers, e.g. Inversion http://inversion.ru, haven’t implemented the support still. Others, e.g. CFT and Diasoft, to compensate for their development costs introduced license fees for modules enabling operation of SPFS. http://catalog.cft.ru/cftbank/SitePages/App.aspx?ID=5833 For instance, price for the CFT products is $10,000 for the basic package (http://catalog.cft.ru/cftbank/SitePages/App.aspx?ID=5833) plus support (30% of the amount per annum).
https://cyberft.com/about/comprasion/spfs https://archive.is/wip/fmmqO
 
Last edited:
Do you lecture your brain surgeon on Neurology, too?
Have you tried not equating yourself to a neurosurgeon?

Cuz if you can't even figure out what
Not the majority, but it only takes a handful.
means and decided to sperg about aggregates instead maybe don't be surprised no one listens to you.

Like for all this pontificating about muh knowledge you apparently don't know basic history about shit like Antifa.

And you have the balls to pretend to know your shit and then bring up neurology to me. :story:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back