"The War On Children" - a documentary about the ongoing LGBT indoctrination of Gen Alpha - goes viral - warning: fucking gross

Trailer:

"The War On Children" exposes the ongoing battle for control of the next generation and their minds. This film reveals the battle plan being used to control the future. To win this war you have to understand the tactics of your enemy.

https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1759049663917838659

Over 5 million views in just a couple hours thanks to Elon signal boosting it.

You can watch it for free from his Twitter until next week, I could only get through the first 30 min or so before turning it off for now. It's revolting and makes my stomach churn, but I don't regret watching it.


IMDB Link

Bitchute Backup

 

[Android raptor]

Doubt

You'd jerk off to a crude graphic novel about a nerd girl trying to become her Lord of the Rings yaoi fanfiction?

 

[derpherp2]

Well, now I know you haven't read the bible.

We do know she reads the handmaid's tale.

Obsessively.
One could say, autistically.

You'd jerk off to a crude graphic novel about a nerd girl trying to become her Lord of the Rings yaoi fanfiction?

9 year old you is an adult jacking off to gundam shotacon?

She's in her "I'm not mad" phase btw guys, someone pop a rez on the DPS.

 

[CircuSphere]

And If you can jack off to the Bible, you have accomplished a Herculean feat and I don't care at that point.

Amateur, if you have a good imagination you can bust a nut before finishing Genesis.

Spoiler: OG Apple Eating Temptress (mildly NSFW)

 

[AnotherPleb]

I'm shocked it took three pages for raptor to derail this thread again. You do know you don't have to reply to her ravings, right?

Who am I kidding, this is called the Autistic Thunderdome for a reason.

 

[derpherp2]

Tradmoids post shit like this and wonder why women refuse to go near them View attachment 5738288

And she's done. Congratulations everyone. Especially @SSj_Ness for getting the commendation.

I don't want any of her loot btw. Ew.

 

[Seething Troon Collector]

If it's well documented, post it. Personally I have yet to see anything other than conservatives stretching the truth or straight up lying about books that were only in high school libraries until they were removed, or clutching pearls about books for children with no actual inappropriate content.

Look I don't want to jump into the middle of this, but I was one the fence too and figured it'd just be like some Catcher in the Rye shit. But then I saw this in the documentary.

Spoiler: Spoilered Because NSFW

Here's the book if anyone's interested (Warning, it's Amazon, but read the comments): Amazon Page with Reviews

Okay. So like, it's pretty graphic shit. This would have never been allowed when I was in school. Surely this is all hysteria, right? Wrong. I was so very wrong, it isn't an isolated incident either.

Even the Author wasn't intending for it to be read by teenagers, but isn't necessarily against it either. You also can't tell me that this isn't pornographic. Dry medical literature with illustrations is not pornographic. Hell I took a human a&p class where we were treated with a video of what childbirth looks like (purely academic and not sexual at all and nobody in the room took it that way) and then an EMT class where the textbook demonstrated different de-gloving injuries (not gore, it's purely for educational purposes). Visual depictions with textual explanations regarding actual sexual acts without scientific or medical context is pornographic. There really isn't any other way you could describe this. Pornography with a story element is still pornographic material. Even Game of Thrones, not strictly pornographic, just skates the line, because it's only tangentially related to the story. Game of Thrones wasn't meant for kids either.

Don't get me wrong, I am against censorship in all forms where human life and limb is not threatened. I do not like censorship of books any more than I like deranged lunatics attempting to censor or deny access to information on The Farms. I don't think this book should be banned, but it should not be widely available to children. If it is to be available to children, there has to be parental oversight to explain things and put them into context, only if the parent agrees that their children is mature enough to understand the material. This decision SHOULD NOT be left in the hands of schools and public libraries and by extension the state. The state can only assume legal responsibility for a child's welfare only in extreme cases. To me, this argument does not rise to the level of in loco parentis.

EDIT: You can be mad and disagree, but don't piss on my leg and tell me it's raining.

 

[WelperHelper99]

You'd jerk off to a crude graphic novel about a nerd girl trying to become her Lord of the Rings yaoi fanfiction?

You would fujo.

We do know she reads the handmaid's tale.

Obsessively.
One could say, autistically.

All I need to know about her... tastes

Amateur, if you have a good imagination you can bust a nut before finishing Genesis.

Spoiler: OG Apple Eating Temptress (mildly NSFW)

View attachment 5738282

Hey thats Adam's wife, leave Eve alone!

 

[Android raptor]

Visual depictions with textual explanations regarding actual sexual acts without scientific or medical context is pornographic. There really isn't any other way you could describe this. Pornography with a story element is still pornographic material.

If a crudely drawn fakeboy graphic novel is what you get off on w/e, but I'm pretty sure even the author didn't intend for it to be spank material.

Either way, no one was showing it to 10 year olds.

 

[derpherp2]

All I need to know about her... tastes

If you really want to get under her skin confuse her with stuff she should know. And then make fun of her for it but never help her.

Like how periods work. Or where babies come from.

If a crudely drawn fakeboy graphic novel is what you get off on w/e, but I'm pretty sure even the author didn't intend for it to be spank material.

Either way, no one was showing it to 10 year olds.

For example.
Ok boykisser

 

[The Ugly One]

They largely don't, but you'll cherry pick a few of them, and the "children" you're referring to in your twisted lies are largely 16-17, unlike the kindergartners LGBT trans out or the 10 year olds offered pornography so heinous adults can't read it at school boards.


Just one of many such cases:

I love how the conservative parents against the porn are saying "pls stop showing kids porn, it's grooming" and the liberals can only retort with "kids can see worse porn online, and you're homophobic"

If even the libtard parents can't deny it's pornographic, just that it's not the most hardcore, you know there's a problem. Well, non-groomers do...

What sort of massive social harm were we experiencing before kids were showing drawings of oral sex in elementary school, anyway?

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Genderqueer? Thats one of the ones that was only available in high school libraries and is less graphic than anatomy illustration in high school health textbooks.

False, it is more graphic than that, you're downplaying it. Furthermore, it was available in middle schools as well and won some award for "books written for adults that have special appeal to young adults ages 12 through 18".

Why are you defending weird LGBT pornography for children and lying about its content and availability to said children? Could it be that you're a biased member of the LGBT and don't mind this form of grooming? It sure looks that way to everyone who isn't in support of 12 year olds being offered pornographic grooming material by trannies in school.

If teens don't count as children when talking about child marriage

Most of that "child marriage" is between minors, not adults, and the adults in most cases aren't much older, it's late teens marrying into early 20's (inappropriate and I don't support it, but you're purposefully painting the picture of 9 year olds marrying 49 year olds, which is a bullshit tactic).

Nice try.

But then I saw this in the documentary.

No different than reading the Bible, right @Android raptor

They blurred that in the news segment I linked to so I wasn't sure what it showed. Now I know why they did. I thought that it would be graphic but not THAT graphic, it's straight up porn. Why are you defending children having that?

Either way, no one was showing it to 10 year olds.

Right, only 12 year olds. It even won an award for being so good for 12 year olds, so it's some pretty good porn!

 

[Android raptor]

False, it is more graphic than that, you're downplaying it. Furthermore, it was available in middle schools as well and won some award for "books written for adults that have special appeal to young adults ages 12 through 18".

Why are you defending weird LGBT pornography for children and lying about its content and availability to said children? Could it be that you're a biased member of the LGBT and don't mind this form of grooming? It sure looks that way to everyone who isn't in support of 12 year olds being offered pornographic grooming material by trannies in school.


Most of that "child marriage" is between minors, not adults, and the adults in most cases aren't much older, it's late teens marrying into early 20's (inappropriate and I don't support it, but you're purposefully painting the picture of 9 year olds marrying 49 year olds, which is a bullshit tactic).

Nice try.


No different than reading the Bible, right @Android raptor

They blurred that in the news segment I linked to so I wasn't sure what it showed. Now I know why they did. I thought that it would be graphic but not THAT graphic, it's straight up porn. Why are you defending children having that?


Right, only 12 year olds. It even won an award for being so good for 12 year olds, so it's some pretty good porn!

Why are you defending children of the same age being married to adult men?

 

[derpherp2]

Right, only 12 year olds. It even won an award for being so good for 12 year olds, so it's some pretty good porn!

For a fujo she doesn't know anime's history.
And I knew that shit when I was interested in it.




When I was 10.
Because someone showed it to me.

Why are you defending children of the same age being married to adult men?

Why are you a 9 year old adult?

 

[Android raptor]

What sort of massive social harm were we experiencing before kids were showing drawings of oral sex in elementary school, anyway?

Kids aren't being shown drawings of oral sex in elementary school

 

[derpherp2]

Kids aren't being shown drawings of oral sex in elementary school

So were you homeschooled ooor....?

 

[Seething Troon Collector]

What sort of massive social harm were we experiencing before kids were showing drawings of oral sex in elementary school, anyway?

Social media isolating children, high stakes testing where you either perform in the 99th percentile or else you die poor and lonely, mandatory seven dozen mandatory fun extracurricular activities that the kid hates but needs in order to get all of that scholarship money to not graduate from college with mortgage sized loan balance with shit repayment terms. Zero tolerance post-columbine hysteria where playing cops and robbers gets the actual police called on you when you're like what, seven. That was just during my time in school, but at least I actually learned stuff.

Nowadays, add genderbending classes, school shooter drills to terrorize you, being used as a prop to meet the political ends of old fuckers like Klaus Schwab and Michael Bloomberg, social media isolating children and it's now mandatory, you VILL use your real name and face because anonymity is equivalent to aiding and abetting virtual cyberterrorism, and it's jannied to hell and back to prevent dissident thought(the shit we used to yell at each other in video game lobbies would see us all unemployable...forever). Classrooms are used to indoctrinate you into fighting for the 'current thing'(TM) circulating on Xitter that week. Oh, and somehow we're going to get elementary school kids disciplined enough to handle themselves in virtual meetings.

I thought school sucked when I went through as a kid/teenager, but holy fuck I wouldn't have ever in my wildest dreams have imagined how much worse it could possibly get. I really didn't know until I watched this, like, I knew it was happening, but it's all sort of abstract until it's shoved in your face. The Starbuck's explained it all quite well, bit too fast-paced for me, but I wasn't really the target audience for their documentary.

 

[FrancineCansMcGee]

No one is giving kids porn at school, except arguably the people forcing kids to look at photos of diseased genitals.

Kids aren't being shown drawings of oral sex in elementary school

Grades 6-12 aren't elementary school

Middle school isn't elementary school and that school goes up to high school.

Yall are dumb.

I don't want to show any porn to young children

Ahh, the classic "ephebophile not pedophile" goalpost shift.

 

[Android raptor]

So were you homeschooled ooor....?

No. We did get shown graphic photos of diseased genitals in middle school though.

 

[derpherp2]

No. We did get shown graphic photos of diseased genitals in middle school though..

https://www.grammarly.com/blog/rhetorical-question/

https://www.verywellhealth.com/what-is-an-autistic-meltdown-260154

Prior to a meltdown, an autistic person will often start to show signs of distress. These can be subtle, like biting their nails or asking to leave, or more obvious, like covering their ears with their hands.

Stims (self-stimulatory behaviors) are self-calming techniques autistic people use to help regulate anxiety or sensory input. Stims include rocking, pacing, humming, or finger flicking. Stimming is also common in the build-up to a meltdown and can become more intense as the distress increases.

Another behavioral response known as eloping or bolting—running away—is also common among autistic children. An autistic person, faced with overwhelming sensory input, anxiety, or stress, may simply run from the room to escape the stimulus.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Why are you defending children of the same age being married to adult men?

If you have to lie you've already lost, my posts are available for everyone to read in their full context.

So now the list grows, here's the two worst things I know you defend:

1) Loli gore hentai (cartoon pornography of children being raped and killed)

2) Graphics textual & cartoon pornography offered to 12 year olds in school as grooming material by your fellow LGBT sex cultists

Is anything missing?

What sort of massive social harm were we experiencing before kids were showing drawings of oral sex in elementary school, anyway?

We weren't diverse enough, which is a huge social harm, so we need the LGBT to groom kids to increase said diversity.