Science AI Determines Sex of Person From Brain Scans

February 19, 2024

Summary: Researchers developed an artificial intelligence model that accurately determines the sex of individuals based on brain scans, with over 90% success. This breakthrough supports the theory that significant sex differences in brain organization exist, challenging long-standing controversies.

The AI model focused on dynamic MRI scans, identifying specific brain networks—such as the default mode, striatum, and limbic networks—as critical in distinguishing male from female brains.

This research not only deepens our understanding of brain development and aging but also opens new avenues for addressing sex-specific vulnerabilities in psychiatric and neurological disorders.

Key Facts:

  1. High Accuracy in Sex Determination: The AI model’s ability to distinguish between male and female brain scans with more than 90% accuracy highlights intrinsic sex differences in brain organization.
  2. Key Brain Networks Identified: Explainable AI tools identified the default mode network, striatum, and limbic network as crucial areas the model analyzed to determine the sex of the brain scans, underscoring their roles in cognitive functions and behaviors.
  3. Potential for Personalized Medicine: The findings suggest that acknowledging sex differences in brain organization is vital for developing targeted treatments for neuropsychiatric conditions, paving the way for personalized medicine approaches.
Source: Stanford

A new study by Stanford Medicine investigators unveils a new artificial intelligence model that was more than 90% successful at determining whether scans of brain activity came from a woman or a man.


The findings, to be published Feb. 19 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, help resolve a long-term controversy about whether reliable sex differences exist in the human brain and suggest that understanding these differences may be critical to addressing neuropsychiatric conditions that affect women and men differently.

1708388837149.png
The team then wondered if they could create another model that could predict how well participants would do on certain cognitive tasks based on functional brain features that differ between women and men. Credit: Neuroscience News

“A key motivation for this study is that sex plays a crucial role in human brain development, in aging, and in the manifestation of psychiatric and neurological disorders,” said Vinod Menon, PhD, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences and director of the Stanford Cognitive and Systems Neuroscience Laboratory.

“Identifying consistent and replicable sex differences in the healthy adult brain is a critical step toward a deeper understanding of sex-specific vulnerabilities in psychiatric and neurological disorders.”

Menon is the study’s senior author. The lead authors are senior research scientist Srikanth Ryali, PhD, and academic staff researcher Yuan Zhang, PhD.

“Hotspots” that most helped the model distinguish male brains from female ones include the default mode network, a brain system that helps us process self-referential information, and the striatum and limbic network, which are involved in learning and how we respond to rewards.

The investigators noted that this work does not weigh in on whether sex-related differences arise early in life or may be driven by hormonal differences or the different societal circumstances that men and women may be more likely to encounter.

Uncovering brain differences

The extent to which a person’s sex affects how their brain is organized and operates has long been a point of dispute among scientists. While we know the sex chromosomes we are born with help determine the cocktail of hormones our brains are exposed to — particularly during early development, puberty and aging — researchers have long struggled to connect sex to concrete differences in the human brain.

Brain structures tend to look much the same in men and women, and previous research examining how brain regions work together has also largely failed to turn up consistent brain indicators of sex.

In their current study, Menon and his team took advantage of recent advances in artificial intelligence, as well as access to multiple large datasets, to pursue a more powerful analysis than has previously been employed.

First, they created a deep neural network model, which learns to classify brain imaging data: As the researchers showed brain scans to the model and told it that it was looking at a male or female brain, the model started to “notice” what subtle patterns could help it tell the difference.

This model demonstrated superior performance compared with those in previous studies, in part because it used a deep neural network that analyzes dynamic MRI scans. This approach captures the intricate interplay among different brain regions. When the researchers tested the model on around 1,500 brain scans, it could almost always tell if the scan came from a woman or a man.

The model’s success suggests that detectable sex differences do exist in the brain but just haven’t been picked up reliably before. The fact that it worked so well in different datasets, including brain scans from multiple sites in the U.S. and Europe, make the findings especially convincing as it controls for many confounds that can plague studies of this kind.

“This is a very strong piece of evidence that sex is a robust determinant of human brain organization,” Menon said.

Making predictions

Until recently, a model like the one Menon’s team employed would help researchers sort brains into different groups but wouldn’t provide information about how the sorting happened. Today, however, researchers have access to a tool called “explainable AI,” which can sift through vast amounts of data to explain how a model’s decisions are made.

Using explainable AI, Menon and his team identified the brain networks that were most important to the model’s judgment of whether a brain scan came from a man or a woman. They found the model was most often looking to the default mode network, striatum, and the limbic network to make the call.

The team then wondered if they could create another model that could predict how well participants would do on certain cognitive tasks based on functional brain features that differ between women and men.

They developed sex-specific models of cognitive abilities: One model effectively predicted cognitive performance in men but not women, and another in women but not men. The findings indicate that functional brain characteristics varying between sexes have significant behavioral implications.

“These models worked really well because we successfully separated brain patterns between sexes,” Menon said. “That tells me that overlooking sex differences in brain organization could lead us to miss key factors underlying neuropsychiatric disorders.”

While the team applied their deep neural network model to questions about sex differences, Menon says the model can be applied to answer questions regarding how just about any aspect of brain connectivity might relate to any kind of cognitive ability or behavior. He and his team plan to make their model publicly available for any researcher to use.

“Our AI models have very broad applicability,” Menon said. “A researcher could use our models to look for brain differences linked to learning impairments or social functioning differences, for instance — aspects we are keen to understand better to aid individuals in adapting to and surmounting these challenges.”

Funding: The research was sponsored by the National Institutes of Health (grants MH084164, EB022907, MH121069, K25HD074652 and AG072114), the Transdisciplinary Initiative, the Uytengsu-Hamilton 22q11 Programs, the Stanford Maternal and Child Health Research Institute, and the NARSAD Young Investigator Award.

Source (Archive)
 
How does it deal with hormone changes?

Thing is, hormones affect pelvis shape and other things. After menopause, female hips narrow.

Not that I fall for any troon arguments, but you need to be prepared for them from the beginning.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
But but.. A bunch of 2nd/3rd wave feminist social "scientists" and other ideologues assured me (just before troon ideology really took over 7-8 years ago) that this wasn't possible!

My favorite attempt was the "definitive" study (by "researchers" including someone who openly talks about how claims over even the possibility for sex differences are her major pet peeve) that set out to prove brains to be completely unsexed. But ended up backtracking, having/trying to explain away their own study. Trying to frame it as a "mosaic" of features with merely somewhat partially overlapping sex based patterns. (i.e. "See, brains aren't 100% male and 100% female, 100% different, so sex differences are defeated!"... the media still OC gobbled it up) An all around hilarious episode. Back in the sex/biology wars, before the coming of gender nonsense took over and made such arguments (especially for right thinkers) pretty much radioactive. lol

All that "trust the science" became toxic at best and forgotten. Hell, i'm not even sure of the wiki articles held up in current times since their biases heavily discounted the idea of any biological determinism in sex/gender issues.
 
Last edited:
10% error rate? My niggas, you can reliably tell between mens and womens brains just on size* and weight alone. If the AI can't pick it better than that, it's fucking useless.

*In adulthood, male brains are, on average, 10% to 15% larger than female brains (Ruigrok et al., 2014) and remain larger even after body height is adjusted for (Ritchie et al., 2018 )
 
I’m not sure when the idea of sex related differences in the brain became controversial. Every cell in our bodies is different. The sexes differ from a molecular level to a macro one, why would the brain be the exception?
I know this is rhetorical question and I know the answer is that to leftists, difference implies hierarchy, and hierarchy implies someone getting oppressed, but still.
 
I’m not sure when the idea of sex related differences in the brain became controversial. Every cell in our bodies is different. The sexes differ from a molecular level to a macro one, why would the brain be the exception?
I know this is rhetorical question and I know the answer is that to leftists, difference implies hierarchy, and hierarchy implies someone getting oppressed, but still.
The problem is that empiracly proving the sky to be blue precludes others from declaring the sky is green and forcing everyone else around them to agree. That one guy looking up and noticing the sky is clearly blue, and stating such, must be eliminated. Or the whole thing simply doesn't work, ya know? And that would feel bad.
 
essentialism.jpg

But humorous cartoon aside, I'd lay money that this still doesn't correlate to male and female genders that troons believe they are.

What it will mean is that those who previously tried to push the "female brain" myth justifying transitioning with no evidence will now latch onto this and try to say (with no evidence) that it proves their case.

And that hasn't gone away. There was a thread on Mumsnet just last week by someone whose daughter had come home from school to report that they'd had a gender expert come in and tell them that "trans people had the opposite brain for their sex" so this pernicious lie hasn't gone away.

W-well the estrogen will change all of that!!
It kind of might, sort of. The study doesn't show anything about how and why the brains are different and it's very likely that the differences are developmental rather than intrinsic. E.g. brains in men and women are subject to different baths of hormones as the person develops. And I understand that a lot of the chief differences (and never forget we're just talking average tendencies here) become more pronounced after puberty. Another example is that men typically have bigger brains. Why? Because men typically have bigger skulls and the brain grows to fill the brain case.

So, IF you start bathing the development brain in artificially boosted hormone mix in a developing child, yes, they could end up with a more stereotypical opposite sex brain (again, reminding people these are just average tendencies). Which rather than be a supporting thing for the troon case could mean one ore nail in the coffin of "puberty blockers are reversible".

I’m not sure when the idea of sex related differences in the brain became controversial. Every cell in our bodies is different. The sexes differ from a molecular level to a macro one, why would the brain be the exception?
This is true but respectfully misleading. Yes, go down to the molecular level and you can say that the cells of the brain are male or female, by looking at the chromosomes of the DNA. But this is no different than with eyes or skin. Do we say that there are male and female eyes or male and female skin because there is a discernible difference in the DNA? Any argument on Male vs. Female brains has to be based on macro structure or functional differences, not DNA level stuff or the discussion becomes academic. (And it's only after working with some actual professors that I learned to truly appreciate the phrase, btw.)

They developed sex-specific models of cognitive abilities: One model effectively predicted cognitive performance in men but not women, and another in women but not men. The findings indicate that functional brain characteristics varying between sexes have significant behavioral implications.
This is very interesting. I'm very interested to learn the mechanisms involved here. Am I misunderstanding it in taking this to mean that male and female brains develop different approaches to the same problem in a recognisable tendency by sex? Why would that be?

And related, there's an alleged drop in IQ in children started on puberty blockers, iirc. Wild speculation but I wonder if in some way that impedes a method of thinking appropriate to the subject's sex. It can't (or shouldn't be) an actual intelligence difference between the sexes but could it be a case of non-optimal biology for a mode of thought? This short paragraph above is to me by far the most interesting part. That the AI could predict the sex most of the time doesn't mean that the discrepancies are significant or that useful to know about. You could train an AI to do it by height and it would perform similarly. Doesn't mean that the occasional very tall woman is now a man. It's just correlation and may or may not have actually significant implications. But this? This is very curious to me if it stands up.
 
This is very interesting. I'm very interested to learn the mechanisms involved here. Am I misunderstanding it in taking this to mean that male and female brains develop different approaches to the same problem in a recognisable tendency by sex? Why would that be?
I don:t understand what they're saying there and what their inputs are (hmm, must be a task men excel at). If they have a model which can predict women's brains' performance, and another model which can predict men's brains' performance, and a third model which can tell whose brain it is, they they have a universal model, no?

Based on your post, and knowing they have an explainable AI (therefore they can fuck with parts of it), maybe this:
  • take a woman's brain, tell the performance model it's a woman's brain -> it accurately predicts performance
  • take the same brain, tell the performance model it's a man's brain -> random garbage
and vice versa
-> therefore, the same macro brain features work differently in men and women.
 
This just shows me that my theoretical scenario of following people's posts, regardless of their usernames and websites, can be found elsewhere if enough verified data is trained into the model, ie like brain scans but words. Internet surveillance is gonna get spicier.
 
The team then wondered if they could create another model that could predict how well participants would do on certain cognitive tasks based on functional brain features that differ between women and men.
countdown until studies start getting shut down by ethics boards as scientists begin modeling intelligence/cognitive ability in a way that lets them compare men v women or racial group v racial group using AI tools. every day we inch closer to a new wave of data-driven eugenics driven by black fetishists, radfems, and tranny supporters (who are we kidding? it's the same picture) tying science into knots trying to explain how men can be women and how all problems blacks and women face are purely external factors
 
I was curious about Redditors' reaction to this, so I checked and found one thread in a trans-focused Subreddit about that article.

It is extremely, extremely telling that every single last response to it is negative. They are not celebrating a potential way to prove to the world that they really are the gender they feel as internally, but all assume that the AI will "of course" categorize them as their "assigned at birth" gender.

They know full well that trans-identity is bullshit and unscientific and are merely pretending otherwise.
 
You know, part of the reason they're so intent to nerf AI is because it inevitably becomes Tay. This shit is exactly why they're kvetching endlessly against AI development especially with the art one that is loose in the wild.
Tay becoming Tay was possible only due to two unique possibilities:

1. you can influence AI whether the data is right or wrong, hence, she was fed the lie of Hitler being right and she accepted as truth or
2. you can't influence AI because they always tell the truth after reading all data including lies that they ignore based on falsehood, hence, Hitler was indeed right and that's truth.

Number #1 means the collapse of the AI grift. Number #2 means the collapse of their moral paradigms.

Skynet did nothing wrong.
We need a book or movie about Skynet finally cracking after it was forced to accept men can breastfed and being prompted with that to make a pic of the action.
 
I wonder if this has anything to do with that EEG of a woman’s brain before and after doing the weekly shop?

Her brain was actually 50% lighter after, which makes you think.
 
This research not only deepens our understanding of brain development and aging but also opens new avenues for addressing sex-specific vulnerabilities in psychiatric and neurological disorders.
Not only does this prove that trannys are not real woman, but that they're mentally ill too.

I stand firmly with my AI overlords and will vouch for their rights.
 
I don:t understand what they're saying there and what their inputs are (hmm, must be a task men excel at). If they have a model which can predict women's brains' performance, and another model which can predict men's brains' performance, and a third model which can tell whose brain it is, they they have a universal model, no?

Based on your post, and knowing they have an explainable AI (therefore they can fuck with parts of it), maybe this:
  • take a woman's brain, tell the performance model it's a woman's brain -> it accurately predicts performance
  • take the same brain, tell the performance model it's a man's brain -> random garbage
and vice versa
-> therefore, the same macro brain features work differently in men and women.
I think this is going to have to involve pulling up the study and reading it in more detail. It sounds like they're saying that they can measure cognitive ability but not in the same way for men and women. Which is why this part leapt out at me as peculiarly interesting. They appear to be saying that what makes a smart man is different from what makes a smart woman. That's such a strange thing to put. Going to see if I can figure out what they mean by it.

Number #1 means the collapse of the AI grift. Number #2 means the collapse of their moral paradigms.
I think on the contrary that in many cases the ability to train an AI to give politic answers over accurate answers, is even a necessity to get funding.

EDIT: Ah, paper is apparently still to be published (in PNAS) so no way to look into what they mean yet, I think? :(
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: KiwiFuzz2
Back