Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
reminds me of the cart they hauled Andre The Giant out to the ring onThere's a pretty easy solution for AF1:
View attachment 5741147
The "roberts court" is maintaining it's utter failure to reign in abuses of judicial process.There's not a single mention of arguments about US military servers in Germany, and plenty of hand-wringing about how filing suit to challenge an election is an attack on the foundation of Democracy (although it apparently wasn't in 2000). So yes, this is a total bullshit ruling, and SCOTUS punted on it, meaning the next time the Democrats steal an election, we've got a ruling on the book establishing that challenging the steal in the court is itself a punishable offense.
According to a grand jury indictment unsealed in the Central District of California, Smirnov allegedly began speaking with his FBI handler in 2017 to discuss Burisma Holdings, Limited, a Ukrainian holding company that hired Hunter Biden to sit on its board.
How remarkably convenient!it's all Russian misinformation
we are on don't believe your lying eyes & ears.
View attachment 5741218
It always shocks me how many people are totally fine with the president being a figurehead and the public having absolutely no idea who's making the decisions.Biden's term has been like a cartoon show. Except the joke is on the world since this is real fucking life.
agree to disagreeI don't care if their election case argument involved projectile diarrhea directed at the judicial bench.
There is no excuse for allowing the state to punish someone for suing them.
This is a threat to "our democracy" and I hereby sanction you for $120,000 USD to deter your horrendous behavior.agree to disagree
Well, hopefully, it'll be over January of next year. We're not even in March yet. The only way out is through.I
It always shocks me how many people are totally fine with the president being a figurehead and the public having absolutely no idea who's making the decisions.
Pretty scary stuff
Do you not understand why this is a complete and total abuse of the judicial system? Can you actually comprehend why we shouldn't be fining and persecuting somebody for calling into question a democratic process?agree to disagree
I'll put this argument less emotionally:Do you not understand why this is a complete and total abuse of the judicial system? Can you actually comprehend why we shouldn't be fining and persecuting somebody for calling into question a democratic process?
Let me explain it for you: Because then we cannot ever question the validity of a democratic process and it will inevitably become corrupted.
You are either willingly ignorant of that or just don't care.
She's fucking other men and the Daily Mail keeps pressing her on it lmaoShe literally did the meme, sheeeeeeeiiiit.
Do you not understand why this is a complete and total abuse of the judicial system? Can you actually comprehend why we shouldn't be fining and persecuting somebody for calling into question a democratic process?
Let me explain it for you: Because then we cannot ever question the validity of a democratic process and it will inevitably become corrupted.
You are either willingly ignorant of that or just don't care.
We have to stop something like Jan 6 from happening again!
If you are Powell, how will you reverse the sanction?I hate headlines. Declined to take the case and upholding a case are very different things.
I hate headlines. Declined to take the case and upholding a case are very different things.
I guess those future engineers and doctors will not be charged
I'm aware of how they function. The headline is still a lie.Declining to hear cases is the Roberts Court's clever-silly way of avoiding issues where the libs are clearly acting lawlessly, but ruling against them will trigger a country-wide temper tantrum. He believes that by not ruling at all on such cases, he preserves the Court's legitimacy.