Sophie Labelle Verville / Guillaume Labelle / Serious Trans Vibes Comics / Assigned Male / Candycore Comics / Pastel Sexy Times / WafflesArt - Obnoxious webcomics and horrific porn by a crazy fat pedo troon

Three years? Three fucking years? He’s a professional cartoonist, I don’t understand how it could possibly have taken him three years to squeeze this out.
Isn't it basically just the "pencil" outline layers of shit he's already done??
I don't get why turning off some layers and maybe a little cropping would take 3 years - maybe he's depressed that the toddlers in his "pastel sexytime" stuff have aged out.
 
New “material”!! It’s a colouring book which means that the lazy, fat, creepy kiddy-fiddler doesn’t even have to paint in the colours! Retard Goat makes a comeback with zir spinny skirt!!
Meanwhile, whatever happened to the troon hockey player getting his mickey out in the girls’ dressing room??
I just cannot get over how goddamn ugly every single thing this brick shithouse of a man makes. Ugly inside and out. He has no understanding of depth or composition or line weight or anatomy (unless he’s ogling BABIES IN DIAPERS to contribute to his furry spank bank:cryblood:) and the colors he chooses are either dull or hideously loud, but always flat. The shitty “airbrush” effect on the leftmost cover kid’s eyes is one of my favorite bits, bc it accentuates just how wonky the fucking eyes are. And speaking of eyes, the face of the kid below that is just hysterical. He thinks that looks good, just like he thinks he looks like a lady and a baby in a swim diaper looks like a sex object. (:_(

He is SO BAD at drawing, yet does it for a living. He draws in a simple, easy-to-replicate style that could (in the hands of someone competent) perhaps be passable as cute normal cartoons for children—but that’s part of what’s so gross about it! He has shown negative creative growth despite being at this for as long as he has. Drawing is a vehicle for his narcissism and sex drive, not an actual passion. He definitely gets off to his main characters being kids, the art style being geared towards what kids like, and maybe even the fact that the art is so bad it could arguably be mistaken for that of a child. The world is so broken for still giving this predator a platform after everything he’s done.

Give me my top hats and tisms, but every day this grotesque behemoth lives to physically assault reporters investigating his pedo tendencies/continue to act on his pedo tendencies is proof against a loving God.
 
He is SO BAD at drawing, yet does it for a living. He draws in a simple, easy-to-replicate style that could (in the hands of someone competent) perhaps be passable as cute normal cartoons for children—but that’s part of what’s so gross about it! He has shown negative creative growth despite being at this for as long as he has. Drawing is a vehicle for his narcissism and sex drive, not an actual passion. He definitely gets off to his main characters being kids, the art style being geared towards what kids like, and maybe even the fact that the art is so bad it could arguably be mistaken for that of a child. The world is so broken for still giving this predator a platform after everything he’s done.
I'm not sure LaBellend actually "draws for a living" in the sense that people pay him because they like his art and want more of it to exist. I think he mostly e-begs for a living and justifies it with terrible drawings.
 
1708104961352.png

Sorry for the low-quality, I'm not at home.
Bonus:
1708106154122.png
 
Last edited:
"Boys can be nurturing, boys can be sensitive, boys can feel pretty, boys can dress however they want."

For fuck's sake, Billy, yes, boys can be all those things - and I thought it was you troons who were promoting the stereotype that boys who were nurturing, sensitive, pretty-feels, wearing dresses, were really girls, needed to have hormone blockers and surgery, etc, etc - in fact I know it was you who were promoting those ideas, because that makes it easier for you to sterilise and fuck about with teenage gay boys.

What they can't be is women. It's the last post on the Twitter thread here - @miss_quark - "Yes. But what they can't be = girls." - that sums it up. Boys can wear skirts and sparkles in their hair and feather-fucking-boas and all those 'tee-hee-hee' stereotypes that women (and gay bottoms) gave up 50 years ago, and yet still not be women. Because being a woman means more than acting like an out-of-date stereotype of a woman. It means your fucking biology, and you're plumbed wrong.


 
And only in a house where you have a basement with a pit that you trap fat women in so you can make a skin suit out of them.
Looking back at it, I think the fox fabric in the last one could be used for a decent looking tablecloth.
Cat mermaids are cute but I can't see any use that doesn't involve either a imprisoned woman or the bedroom of a 2-10 years old girl.
Ice cream in the first one is reminds me of some kind of apron or potholder.
Pastel dinsosaurs is for a kid's bedroom pillow, even buffalo bill would feel ashamed of it.
 
Back