So is Null morally responsible for the bad things some users of KF have done using this site? There are valid arguments for both sides of this, I'm just interested if you're consistent.
You're not thinking very hard because it's not just about words. That aside you can't even think of one thing? There's all kinds of things you could post or do on a website to cause someone real tangible harm.
I'm not having this debate here though.
There's no equivalency, retard. Right next to this front page feature is the post with Keffals and his latest crises due to defending Vaush's loli/pedo content. Which is right next to Vaush's denial of his pedo tendencies. That's the
EXACT SAME SITUATION that people are criticizing this guy for. There are multiple accounts of articles where this guy, while he might not have been an outright pedo (at least nothing brought to light as of yet), he didn't exactly discourage or try to prevent any of that from happening in the Furry "community", and apparently he actively kicked out the small group of people who stood up and tried to keep that shit from creeping into it. Null and the other mods actively discourage fed-posting, cow-tipping, and other IRL activities against any cows posted on here. This isn't fucking Soyjack where they're like "Here's the doxxx, it'd be a shame if someone sent them pizzas, called and harassed their families/work, etc. hehehe
" That's more along of the lines of what this degenerate faggot fostered and allowed to grow, if not outright encouraged. Section 230 protections (in theory) afford Null and other operators protection provided they take steps to actively discourage and remove illegal content. Unfortunately due to Current Year
degeneracy, IRL laws are increasingly dismissed or ignored because of section "LGBTQOMGTWTFBBQ+123" protections. Remember, if you celebrate or allow Furry faggotry, you support grooming of kids.
Just do the brain math... the progenitor pf furfaggotry is dead. Think of the number of bloodlines ended because of his retarded ideas. Consider what might have been if said dead ends had constructively channeled their autism...
I'd argue that no bloodlines were eliminated. Faggots usually breed through molestation of little kids, so if anything, instead of run-of-the-mill little faglets running around, they're now Furry fags, which is objectively worse, because not only is the faggotry still present, they have an outward appearance that's deliberately designed to be attractive to little kids.
They don't like fags, but they are 500% down with gay sex, because its not gay as long as no one catches feelings. In fact, its super holy for you and another guy to suck each other off (or when you nut in pre-pubescent butthole) because now you are in post-nut clarity when you pray and aren't distracted with lust. Manlove thursday was real, and it was in the whole region.
That's alot of words to essentially say "prison gay".
