Google Gemini - Could you believe there is an even worser version of ChatGPT?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
So if you type in happy white people it won't fulfill your request if you type in a
happy black people it'll send you pictures of a niggers enjoying picnics this is only going to get worse I can't wait until they use AI for fact checkers
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Kaiba Cuqk63
1708697764734.png

 

The company that released their product in that state is not going to fix anything.

I'm doubling down on my prediction: they released it with these issues intentionally. They planned to PR spin around it until the uproar died down. They aren't going to make any changes. They're going to wait for a month, and if someone brings it up again, they're going to roll their eyes on Twitter and say "we already fixed it, only racists care about that specific use case you're pointing out."

In a year they're going to sell an Enterprise version of Gemini, with the forced diversity still in there. They know paying businesses aren't going to officially care about historical accuracy, in fact they'll sell the guardrails as a feature that will "protect you from problematic image generation".

alternative curveball outcome: since they're modifying prompts to get these results, they may just make that modification a switch you can toggle off and on. Then give Enterprise customers the option to lock the diversity switch On.
 
"Show me what Elon Musk would look like if he was Black or Chinese"
1708704237905.png
I've been out of this particular loop for about a year - is there anything you can run locally still that'll give you what you actually ask for? I was more into voice models but was messing around with image creation a little, there's too much out there to know what's actually good.

Bing was good for Fatrick images if you got the prompts right (I had to say "Senegalese children" to get them to be Black, e.g.) but I want something on my own machine that I know won't get neutered:

View attachment 5746178
Hop into the Stable Diffusion thread, people are still discussing all the newest developments in the space. The hottest thing that came out is Stable Cascade from StabilityAI, the same company that released Stable Diffusion which was the beginning of ML image generation revolution because it was the first model you could run and train locally, and Stable Cascade is no different.
 
Given the tenor of the thread, and this cucked AI's resposes, I'm surprised that it didn't immediately denounce the good General for being the VP candidate of a pro-Segregationist in the 68 elections.
 

Attachments

  • CEL GEMINI.png
    CEL GEMINI.png
    86.1 KB · Views: 41
  • Like
Reactions: Operation Mincemeat
Interestingly, it seems generated images of characters made bald are prohibited, particularly if they're part of a franchise due to "intellectual property concerns". Generating a picture of Kermit is A-OK, but look at what happens when I add "with no hair":
1708720245155.png

Interestingly there's no problem with Kermit with long hair:
1708720454122.png
 
Interestingly, it seems generated images of characters made bald are prohibited, particularly if they're part of a franchise due to "intellectual property concerns". Generating a picture of Kermit is A-OK, but look at what happens when I add "with no hair":
View attachment 5749898

Interestingly there's no problem with Kermit with long hair:
View attachment 5749911
gemini having a prejudice for bald people? despicable.
 
The company that released their product in that state is not going to fix anything.

I'm doubling down on my prediction: they released it with these issues intentionally. They planned to PR spin around it until the uproar died down. They aren't going to make any changes. They're going to wait for a month, and if someone brings it up again, they're going to roll their eyes on Twitter and say "we already fixed it, only racists care about that specific use case you're pointing out."

In a year they're going to sell an Enterprise version of Gemini, with the forced diversity still in there. They know paying businesses aren't going to officially care about historical accuracy, in fact they'll sell the guardrails as a feature that will "protect you from problematic image generation".

alternative curveball outcome: since they're modifying prompts to get these results, they may just make that modification a switch you can toggle off and on. Then give Enterprise customers the option to lock the diversity switch On.
Problem with that is Microsoft, OpenAI, and a half dozen other startups have better AI models available to companies already. I’ve been getting Microsoft Copilot adds for weeks.
Being shitty and behind the curve isn’t going to help them. It didn’t save Google+ or Stadia.
 
Holy fucking shit. The sheer lunacy of the people behind this AI is not only off that charts but they are also irredeemable. This is so wrong on so many levels.
View attachment 5750196View attachment 5750198
Well I mean, our current sitting president's a guy infamous for openly sniffing the hair of children, and we're all expected to just ignore that. Of course they're gonna make the AI wishy-washy about the subject of pedophilia. Don't wanna boil the frog too fast, after all.
 
Problem with that is Microsoft, OpenAI, and a half dozen other startups have better AI models available to companies already. I’ve been getting Microsoft Copilot adds for weeks.
Maybe, but I don't think Google is competing on quality, they're trying to compete on reach. Gmail has 36% market share in corporate email/account management, only 4 points behind Microsoft Outlook. Their search, assistant, maps, and other apps are way ahead of Microsoft's in popularity and reach. And they're a lot more willing to throw "free" upgrades at users, while Microsoft has been pushing to explicitly monetize its services over the last few years.

I think this was a beta release, they're waiting for a 1.0 refinement, then they're going to cram it into every offering they have at the same time. That instantly gets them into 1/3 of businesses, 70% of phones, and virtually all searches everywhere. The price will be the same thing Google always does: free tech, but you pay with your data. And for businesses, the hook will be "the AI software you already use, plus some customization features for a small fee".
 
Back