View attachment 5752516
ive just checked my email and found out i could’ve been a janitor over Fraulein Troonjak, and stopped his sperg-out on the ‘farms
Send a reply to him and I can talk to root about it.
I don't think we are familiar with the scars on your hand. It would have been easier to just post on the sharty saying "I am EszettDoll on kiwifarms."
It'd be really strange and random for me to do that out of the blue, but a question came up earlier so now everyone can rest easy that the obvious has been confirmed.
The one thing I find annoying with 'sharty admins, especially Doll is that they never talk, and leave their actions up for interpretation until it's too late. We never got any word when suggestion posts on /q/ about how to mitigate 'cord spam were made. We have never heard word from the VPN posting bans and how they don't work to prevent 'cord link spam.
It's like, you could've completely avoided this disaster if you had announced the exact intentions beforehand. You could've completely stopped /soy/ from thinking that feds took over like what happened with /b/. Instead of making everyone shit their pants, you could've just said that the limit was on major people like the DNSL raid.
The Doll F&Q is my only reason for liking Doll, he was extremely articulate with opinions and it was the first time where I felt like I and others were being listened to. I also found it interesting as to how things work backdoors. I like it when Doll posts, but jannies really need to start being more transparent. I'm not mad, I'm just making it known that people want more talk.
There are a lot of people and sites within the soysphere between the official sites, the splinters, the game servers, and the offsite communities like this that I try to interact with on a daily to weekly basis. Between the jannies, developers, fnac crew, youtube, and the users, I rarely have time to articulate a full thought to every person at once and spend a lot of time at work daydreaming how to structure the way the sites should be ran and how I am going to break it to others. I will try to cut down on this preparation time as we go forward so it doesn't leave everyone in the dark.
@EszettDoll Don't do the Kuz thing where you make a change and then immediately reverse the change after people start complaining. It didn't help, and just made the site administration look like a joke. At least wait 2 or so more weeks until the backlash will likely have died down
It is very rare for me to do something like that. Most of the choices made by me are thought over for many days prior to making them, so its really counterproductive to go back on something I might of planned for a few months. The only problem I forsee is how willing jannies are to enforce changes, but that is for root to figure out and we will get more jannies if the current group is having trouble.
As far as what I've gleaned from the wording and Doll's posts, "enemies" in the pinned post means those who try to take action against the site, whether it be submitting shitflare abuse reports, doxing 'teens, antagonizing, or snitching. Essentially, doxing has become what lethal force to an officer is, (debatably, at least on paper, let's not make this political sperging) the last resort, when somebody is seriously overreaching and trying to harm the stability of the site, even if it's a minuscule chance of actually succeeding like abuse reports. Doll said he won't interfere if you try to bait someone you are raiding into getting into that status, so do with that info what you will.
My interpretation is that if you come at the site with the intent to harm it via attacking the infrastructure, users, or staff, then you should be prepared to receive some blowback. If one of those people comes to the site and reports that there is stuff about them on the site, then janny knows to tell me about it before any action is taken. The party is a waterfall on the edge of a cliff. It starts off very slow, then you hear the falling water, and if you don't get out of the current you are going to drown.
If the concern is over being reported to their hosts, what good does banning the doxing of randos do if you're still going to purposefully target the people actually filing the reports? And what good does baiting people into filing reports do??? If the mods are worried about losing hosts due to doxing, why are they only banning some of it? Without banning it entirely, the reportfags still have stuff to report, and limiting the doxing to just them will only give them more energy to file reports, because now you've made it personal. Unless there were some other points I'm missing, this reasoning makes zero sense. This will either do nothing to actually address the issue of hosting, or it is the first step on a slippery slope to banning all doxing, and the mods just don't want to come out and say it.
The staff won't target anyone. I am not liable for what the users do. They can report the dox threads as they come up and they will be handled, and if someone tries to hurt the site rather than contact the staff, then they are really tying my hands. Janny is a little yellow dog with glasses that lives inside all imageboard users, and he gets pissed just like you do. If he is awake or watching the site when I am not, or if he isn't online when he is supposed to be, and that material gets posted, and it is known the person being hit with the dox is trying to get the site taken down, then it is what it is. I can chide him for hours or fire him or the person that reported the site can take their information off of the internet and protect themselves rather than targeting me for running the funny woahjak site. The immediate solution is the last one.
If the posts are still up, report them so Doll grabs the IP and hands over the info to who it needs to be handed off to.
Its been handled, thank you.
