Are bisexuals real?

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
You have either fucked men up the ass or not. You are gay as a freaking frog if you have fucked a man up the ass, and trying to fuck women after is just cope and denial
Option one: my sexuality functions as god created it and untold generations of natural selection, which can only result from the union of man and woman, have refined it

Option two: my brain is broken and I like shit on my dick
 
Option one: my sexuality functions as god created it and untold generations of natural selection, which can only result from the union of man and woman, have refined it

Option two: my brain is broken and I like shit on my dick
Basically what it comes down to. You're either fucking to make babies or to get aids from another man's shit hole. If you're going for the aids option, you ain't straight, you are gay.
 
Basically what it comes down to. You're either fucking to make babies or to get aids from another man's shit hole. If you're going for the aids option, you ain't straight, you are gay
You're either fucking to rip your taint open shitting out cum pets for some moid who might also give you an STD or in the category that has the lowest risk of STD infection
 
You're either fucking to rip your taint open shitting out cum pets for some moid or in the category that has the lowest risk of STD infection
Press-X-To-Doubt-Feature-Image.jpg
Gay people don't have aids?
 
Let's take a look at the Kinsey scale, guess I'm in the number 6 category.
View attachment 5753531
Kinsey was a rockefeller funded person who hoodwinked the american public and the scientific community with intentionally deceptive studies. It's almost impossible to find any studies on sexuality that don't cite kinsey or kinsey institute research (the project continues after his death). But with that said, even established academics have moved away from the Kinsey scale for the reason that the amount of heterosexual attraction and amount of homosexual attraction does not appear to be a zero sum situation, they could both be high, they could both be low.

If you want some support why I say that kinsey hoodwinked people , I've gone into more depth about him here and here.

When it comes to men Null is definitely right, bisexual men are just gay men who want a bangmaid mommy to take care of them while they go and chase dick behind her back. They're the reason women get AIDS.
Fags are the reason anyone gets aids or syphilis. These diseases would probably have been eradicated without fags, or if they had to be more secretive about their bumfucking and couldn't reach the astronomical number of lifetime partners as they currently do.

----

Null said they're either gays who don't want to be considered too gay or they're straights pretending to be special and different. I don't know what to think. What's your opinion?
I think it's hard to really compare male and female sexuality. They're very different. It's almost strange to apply bisexuality to both, because a bisexual man and a bisexual woman is a very different situation.

I think there's a couple of perspectives to look at it.

You can take the naturalistic view. From that perspective homosexuality and bisexuality serves no procreative function, and is a malformation or a social role only.
The traditionalist/religious view is somewhat comparable to the above.
There's the lgbtq/hedonistic view. From that perspective what someone says about themselves is what counts and any amount of testing is a kind of invalidating oppression.
But I think what people mean when they ask about the lady gaga perspective. Are people born this way? What is their birth fixed attraction? And is it possible to be to both sexes?

The gender social constructionists have used the complexity of sexuality as a smokescreen to push through all their ideology and presumptions, same as kinsey did. But that doesn't mean it isn't complex. We aren't just born one way. Testosterone levels in womb seem to matter. Imprinting seems to matter. We don't fully understand it. The naturalistic view is a good foundation for a society that wants to function well. But it obviously is a short hand, and there will be people with desires and paraphelia that go outside the confines of that. And even if we weren't intentionally being socially engineered to be easier to govern, we might arrive at the same location through sheer decadence. The same kind of decadence that would have people waste this many hours just chatting with each other on a kiwifarms.

All that to say, yeah bisexuality exists, but it means you're a fag if you're male and a slut if you're female.
 
Last edited:
Back