Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 52 16.3%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.4%

  • Total voters
    319
I have a theory about Nick's 'I always tell the truth' cope.

As long as he's always doing what he wants (and/or what he needs to do to get what he wants from his audience), then he's being the real him. If the audience later feels deceived by learning of his hypocrisy, then that's the audience's fault for not realizing that he sometimes feels like doing something different.

Your theory makes sense and informs on how he justifies his being direct and mean, which is something that other shit streamers like DSP and Ralph like to call being authentic.

And because he's so authentic on other topics, his wet brain believes that if he just keeps telling everyone that he's telling the truth, he can lie about dumb things such as his Hedonism 2 vacation and people will believe him.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: ShinyStar
We have reached that stage? Where people believe Faran over Nick?
Yes because it fits.
I also agree that she's not some innocent suffering wife. She's as degenerate as he is. If the theories are correct that they had sex in front of others at Hedonism II, she'd have to be. No woman that isn't into that kind of shit too would participate in that.

Also, stop double posting.
 
Yes because it fits.
I also agree that she's not some innocent suffering wife. She's as degenerate as he is. If the theories are correct that they had sex in front of others at Hedonism II, she'd have to be. No woman that isn't into that kind of shit too would participate in that.

Also, stop double posting.
I mostly agree, but spouses have incredible pull on each other. Strong feelings and emotional bonds make one very vulnerable to manipulation.

She deserves criticism, but I remain convinced Lord Balldo cajoled her into his bullshit.

Can anyone honestly believe that she could pressure "ODD" Nick into doing anything on her own? Nick got some money and immediately turned stupid and gave her the fruit balldo of knowledge of good and evil.
 
I mostly agree, but spouses have incredible pull on each other. Strong feelings and emotional bonds make one very vulnerable to manipulation.

She deserves criticism, but I remain convinced Lord Balldo cajoled her into his bullshit.

Can anyone honestly believe that she could pressure "ODD" Nick into doing anything on her own? Nick got some money and immediately turned stupid and gave her the fruit balldo of knowledge of good and evil.
I think people get stuck in trying to blame one or the other instead of acknowledging it's both of them.

It could be that she wanted to swing, he didn't but he was wanting to do other degenerate shit so they compromised. We don't know the specifics, I'm just saying that she's not innocent in the degeneracy. I don't believe for one second that it's all him and she's just being manipulated into everything. Nor do I believe the opposite. The truth is somewhere in between.
 
I think Nick made the mistake of trying to marry what he believed was the idealized young woman twenty years ago. It didn’t have much to do with compatibility but what he believed society most prized in a woman when he was in his twenties.

I’ve known several men who did this, all ended up divorced after a few kids and 10-15 years of marriage. The guys all were a different levels of hedonists that liked to raise a little hell, chase bad girls and drink but were also raised middle class Christian boys. a “bad boy” that wants a very “good girl” as a wife syndrome.
I think your interpretation is sound. I've known several Christian men in devout circles just like Rickets who married the right kind of Christian woman even though these guys were actually hedonistic bastards at heart. It's the old Madonna/Whore complex thing. These guys either felt the right thing to do in the eyes of their religious circles was to marry the virtuous woman and/or they had a split psyche where part of them thought they needed to marry a good girl even though the other part of them secretly wanted the bad girls.

The big difference is that these kind of guys usually cheat on their good wives with the bad girls. They usually live a dual life of marriage with a mistress or a string of mistresses on the side, or they dump their wives when they enter their mid-life crisis and run away with the younger, bad girl. Rickets is different in that his solution was to (presumably) corrupt his wife from good Christian to Whore of Babylon instead of getting rid of her. Which is even more depraved.

At least the scumbag, fake Christian men who cheat on their wives leave those wives with their reputations intact. The scandal might be embarrassing, but the women come out looking like wronged martyrs. Rickets doesn't want to just destroy his marriage, he wants to corrupt his wife's soul to satisfy his degenerate lusts. (Presumably, if he's the one forcing her down this path to please him.)
 
Can anyone honestly believe that she could pressure "ODD" Nick into doing anything on her own?
pressure? no, never. he's the type that will push back hard against anything and everything out of sheer stubbornness.
but those types can still be manipulated by someone smart who knows them well. put ideas into their heads and make them feel like it's something they came up with themselves, or spin a narrative where by doing something you want they're actually sticking it to some outside adversary, real or imagined. works best on suggestible people, and drunks tend to be very suggestible (alcohol makes you lower your guard)

not saying this is what's happening, just that nick being a stubborn and spiteful fuck doesn't mean he's immune to all outside influence.
 
View attachment 5756216
this was clipped out of context, but that’s less fun
Nothing says good father and husband like wearing a wife beater, hitting the bottle, and showing off a tattoo that looks like it was done by a one-eyed wetback in prison. I've seen more class from Early Cuyler.
 
Really? Whats the point of pretending to be a Christian at all except for grifting and appearances. Just send them to public school and then he wont need any "De-programming" at all because they'll be just like Balldoman when they're done. I'd love to see a clip of that copesplain.

It is on the list for the 'Religion' section. It is a bit of a time sink to re-watch Nick content and find clips--especially on Rumble without transcripts to search. This is the main cause of delay to the OP re-write.

This should go into the new OP. This is brilliant.

I have been ignoring comments in the PG thread because I will treat it as a laundry list of advice to look at once I finish the last few updates I need to, but I saw this here, so I will respond here so I do not forget. You have not seen or heard the plans for the subsequent FAQ/Highlights, and I think that this would be beneficial to cross-post in the PG thread.

I have linked this under the smallish Kayla section, so it will take a bit of digging to find. The OP is intended to serve as an introduction and and jump off point for new fans--not a comprehensive biography. It started that way, was 5 time longer, and had only gotten to the middle of Eric July drama, so I changed tacks. My goal is to put together something that captures the interest and notable points of Nick's arc for new farmers totally unexposed to Nick, while pointing in the direction of more detailed content, if they so choose. As a secondary purpose, it will serve as an FAQ and collection of media and archives most cited and useful.

The nitty gritty details of the individual arcs (LOLSuit, Religion, Weeb Wars, Legal Bytes, and the like) are handled topically in the FAQ with few hundred word summaries and link to topical thread--as required. I have given my redoubtable team of researchers that have assisted me to this date the option to write these summaries if they really have something that they want included. I will extend that offer to any one who feels like they have a mini-arc that is much too important to be left out. I reserve the right to quash and or edit it if I think it is repetitive (We will not have a section on the colour of Nick's hot tub water or similar, or one on both Nick's Mustang and his Spendthrift ways), and I will do my best to support you with clips and archives already gathered, but YOU are responsible for writing and compiling the summary and media into a narrative.

oh i grew up with coupld dozen Baptist who would disagree with you!

It is interesting how many people can mean different things by the same religious terms. It is equally astounding how many sophist exist that confuse issues by semantics (Looking at you, Calvinists who draw a line from 'Perseverance of the Saints' to the 'Eternal Security' and ignore alternative logical paths to the same end)

Definitions matter, and we know Nick is a mealy mouthed churl whose word is not to be trusted. He has said that his definition of things are different than others as an excuse, and his friends have picked that up with their debate on the meaning of 'catfish' as a distraction from the blatant embarassing act itself.

I wonder if somoene is going to make a report to children services. i hope not b/c i a not sure i agree that his children are in any danger.

Stop talking about breaking site rules, and learn how to add replies to multiple posts. Both are gay and require more lurking time to beat out.

ETA:

INRE @Null As the one who watches and summarises them all, he occasionally varies the cope with rants about his good health, plans for content that somehow never materialises, and how busy he is doing... anything other than streaming. It it part of the reason I wrote the opening of the OP how I did--it is a bit hyperbolic, but not much. The flare is more dramatic than it is exaggerative.
 
I think people get stuck in trying to blame one or the other instead of acknowledging it's both of them.

It could be that she wanted to swing, he didn't but he was wanting to do other degenerate shit so they compromised. We don't know the specifics, I'm just saying that she's not innocent in the degeneracy. I don't believe for one second that it's all him and she's just being manipulated into everything. Nor do I believe the opposite. The truth is somewhere in between.
Sure, but its rarely 50/50 equal blame.

Like I said, Kayla deserves criticism, but when one takes the totality of what we do know, it seems to suggest that Nick took the lead here once he started to bring in the money. Do you really suspect that Kayla wanted to swing right as Nick was making it rich? Again, both are culpable for their very poor decisions, but I doubt that co-equal blame is correct.
 
I believe Nick made this claim to Faran. I do not believe Nick was telling the truth. No elaboration necessary.
Is it possible that he gaslit her into being the one to ask for swinging/opening the marriage? A little prod here and there about how cool and fun Drexel's life sounded or something like that maybe.
But maybe he just told Faran that Kayla wanted it so he looked like less of a creep when he asked her to do the livestream roll back again, only in his bed this time.

Edit:
Can we get a threadban for any retard talking about contacting CPS from this point forward?
Make sure you tag @Null or @AltisticRight (or any other janny that frequents the thread) because we do not need another TiC. I went back and read that era of the thread to educate myself, what a flaming faggot he and anyone else who cow-tips is.
 
It just really sunk in for me that by now Nick Rekieta likely earns less than the average KF user (ones that have a job anyway :story:).

Hell, I think someone who only has one part time job earns more than him per month? If he doesn't confirm his rumble contract is renewed (We're 4 days away from march, no trip to rumble in sight), he is now a loser who earns around less than 1.5k a month. He really should stop talking like he's in a higher position than anyone. :story:

My side hustle gig pays more than what he makes on stream, and this guy was *the* top superchat earner on YouTube. Pathetic.

Makes me think perhaps it was literally all luck from the beginning, and the requirement for some kind of external pull, because now there's no Vic case to ride off of, no Heard vs Depp, no Rittenhouse trial - just him, and this is what he can pull.

God sees your balldo, Nick.

If we have another global flood, we will know why. Better not let Nick or the hoe on the Ark.

I don't understand, does he just spend his Rumble contract Locals show just complaining about Locals and the Rumble contract literally every single day?

And Kiwi Farms. Can't forget his #1 obsession.
 
Back