Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

[Chandelier]

Diversity isn't the problem. Sanitation is. Archive.


They are angry at the culture they created and the backlash they got from their laissez faire attitude.

Content creators should be aware of their privileges. They might just get visited by a media critic whose published articles are about transphobia in lolicon. Archive.



Racist radfems at it again! Archive.


Banning porn is bad. You might harm someone. Archive.


From the same person who said that we should not kill rapists or pedophiles, she recommends having a prison pen pal instead! Archive.


You better not be against porn, you Christo-fascist. Archive.


Yes, and who runs the Boy Scouts, again? Who was arrested, again?


These same people were fine with right wingers losing access to their Paypal accounts. In fact, they cheered for it. Once it came knocking on their doors, suddenly it's evil.


Wow, just wow. Cite a source, yo.

 

[AmazingEagle]

Plenty of twitter leftists were making fun of the original image however this one caught me off-guard. I’m totally confused where this take comes from.

View attachment 5743238

Something something Twitter OP wants to rape white women.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

There was a VICE article that claimed the "far right" are uniting on the right to free speech (they put free speech in quotes), and said it was "AKA racist bullshit".

"Yikes! Let's unpack this."

• Seems anyone who isn't "woke" is "far right" to SJWs.
• It also seems speech that isn't "woke" is "wrongthink" (and so is "BS") to SJWs.
• And "wrongthink" to SJWs can be called a number of soy labels, such as "racist".

In other words, yet another example of how SJWs try to "gaslight" people into being SJWs.

 

[r9k-speaks]

 

[ToroidalBoat]

There's a Bloomberg article claiming that "woke" will take over the world, and that "it's a good thing", but of course you need to join or subscribe to see the whole article. Assuming they're right and not lying yet again, Clown World sucks and it seems endless.

 

[Chandelier]

Stonetoss is a disgusting Nazi with two jokes.

Archive.

African nationalism and European nationalism are not comparable. Archive.

Christa Peterson, perma-student, discusses how a moustached Austrian's paintings are garbage.


Archive - with Troon response:

Someone tell the Troon their icon doesn't have any perspective or use of colour theory.

 

[Chandelier]

Apologies for double posting - it was too late for me to add this in the post.

Did you know X-men was the original woke show? Link / Archive


Fun little tidbit: I used to watch Totally Spies as a kid. The animation really stood out as the girls really did wear different outfits every episode. In any case, there was one specific episode where the villain was a woman who punished the spies for being too vain. Anyone who wore makeup was basically sprayed with this chemical that made them fuck-ugly; Alex, the brown-skinned one, was made into a Neanderthal. Clover, who was going through an emotional moment, didn't even brush her teeth or wear makeup. She was not affected by the chemical because the villain considered her visage fine, 'with no need for her products'. Troons would be gassed effectively because of how much effort they put into passing and the sheer amounts of makeup they use.

---

Khazar pooner with hentai pussy (her words, not mine) is against prison retaliation and violence...unless it applies to Derek Chauvin. She's a pacifist, you know. Link / Archive

---

"How can you be pro Palestine but anti LGBT?" Archive.

 

[World Famous Quasi Payer]

Banning porn is bad. You might harm someone.

They do have a point. All the secular reasons for banning porn won't fix the issues that secular anti-porn people claim a ban would fix. Banning porn would make domestic violence and martial rape more common if anything.

Beyond trying to cut down on the number of troons, the only reasons to ban porn would be religious ones.

 

[Positron]

Christa Peterson, perma-student, discusses how a moustached Austrian's paintings are garbage.

Hitler's paintings were very good as an amateur -- if he were already pro why would he even try to enroll in Vienna Academy? You may complain of a lack of originality, but originality is not a requirement for Academic-style painting. It is, of course, customary to dismiss Hitler as a bad painter because the ((())) don't want to be blamed for having inadvertently created the Führer we now know and love.

 

[BaskingBarracuda]

So I paid a visit to the Smithsonian Museum of American History in DC and what a captured institution it is.

There are exhibits dedicated to Hamilton, The Handmaid’s Tale and fucking Crazy Rich Asians





Sucking off rich celebrities doing MeToo, and also general ‘girls rule boys drool’ feminism




(Justice is when people you’re annoyed with feel left out. Nice sentiment you’re promoting there)



(Just leave out that the different contract the women had with more perks for less money, and that those ‘Lesser performing male players’ were pulling in more money anyway)

Don’t forget Muslims because Orange Man




The word Latinx is unironically used here




And of course what Current Year exhibit would be complete without sucking off troons?





Even the actual history that’s in there doesn’t escape it. Benjaming Franklin contributed significantly to scientific advancements? Did you know women and blacks did work for him!?

 

[AnOminous]

So I paid a visit to the Smithsonian Museum of American History in DC and what a captured institution it is.

I hope they haven't fagged up the Natural History one because I fucking loved that place.

 

[BaskingBarracuda]

I hope they haven't fagged up the Natural History one because I fucking loved that place.

Fortunately I found that one to be fine. The other Smithsonians I went in were good as well, to be fair, it’s just this one has been fully captured.

 

[Hồ Chí Minh]

View attachment 5761102

This account has 730k posts since 2009. That's 730,000. About 135 PER DAY. This person is insane.

 

[Chandelier]

Porn is not addictive. Dead serious. Only Christian and TERF organization say porn is bad. Link / Archive


You will not notice it on Nitter, but she got Community Noted.

This is not the first time she's made scientifically inaccurate statements. She's made comments on 'biological essentialism' before, throwing out the entirety of behavioural genetics because she is a Jewish, PTSD, SA'ed forensic psychology student.

There is a lot more research on porn being addictive. She's just ignoring the data because 'it's not strong enough to have that kind of effect'.

If you criticize porn, you are probably a degenerate yourself. Archive.

 

[Gingervitis]

Porn is not addictive. Dead serious. Only Christian and TERF organization say porn is bad. Link / Archive
View attachment 5770927
View attachment 5770928
You will not notice it on Nitter, but she got Community Noted.
View attachment 5770932
This is not the first time she's made scientifically inaccurate statements. She's made comments on 'biological essentialism' before, throwing out the entirety of behavioural genetics because she is a Jewish, PTSD, SA'ed forensic psychology student.

There is a lot more research on porn being addictive. She's just ignoring the data because 'it's not strong enough to have that kind of effect'.

If you criticize porn, you are probably a degenerate yourself. Archive.
View attachment 5770929

I feel like people overuse the term “porn addiction” (someone who jerks off once a day isn’t the same as someone who watches rape porn and looks at naked women on the job), but porn addiction 100% exists and can ruin your relationships with people if uncontrolled.

 

[AmazingEagle]

Porn is not addictive. Dead serious. Only Christian and TERF organization say porn is bad. Link / Archive

"No guys you don't understand. Porn addiction isn't real, it's a conspiracy theory created by those heckin TERFs and Christofascists! I am a man of culture!"

 

[Ammyterasu]

So I paid a visit to the Smithsonian Museum of American History in DC and what a captured institution it is.

There are exhibits dedicated to Hamilton, The Handmaid’s Tale and fucking Crazy Rich Asians

View attachment 5768510
View attachment 5768511
View attachment 5768515

Sucking off rich celebrities doing MeToo, and also general ‘girls rule boys drool’ feminism

View attachment 5768516
View attachment 5768521

(Justice is when people you’re annoyed with feel left out. Nice sentiment you’re promoting there)

View attachment 5768524

(Just leave out that the different contract the women had with more perks for less money, and that those ‘Lesser performing male players’ were pulling in more money anyway)

Don’t forget Muslims because Orange Man

View attachment 5768512
View attachment 5768514

The word Latinx is unironically used here

View attachment 5768513
View attachment 5768517

And of course what Current Year exhibit would be complete without sucking off troons?

View attachment 5768519
View attachment 5768522
View attachment 5768523

Even the actual history that’s in there doesn’t escape it. Benjaming Franklin contributed significantly to scientific advancements? Did you know women and blacks did work for him!?

View attachment 5768518

So much cringe. And here I hoped it was just temporary insanity when they featured Jazz Jennings a few years ago

 

[Mitt Doggy Dogg]

So much cringe. And here I hoped it was just temporary insanity when they featured Jazz Jennings a few years ago
View attachment 5774230

Is that whale Jazz Jennins?

 

[Positron]

Museums are curated by the most agenda-ridden of people. They are invariably marinated in Marxism, feminism, queerism, post-colonial theory, and all that jazz, but are too weak to go to the streets and protest. People who think art in general can (and ought to) change the world are bad enough, and museum curators are people who think the art they favor can change the world.

And Museums themselves like those people too. An art-for-art-sake exhibition by a white male artist might get a write-up in ArtNEWS and Village Voice, but a politicized exhibition will get noticed by both the popular press like NYT, Vox, Huff Post and the even more artsy-fartsy Artforum. Two birds in one stone.

 

[Zemblan Physics]

This fucking essay is probably going to earn me a bunch of top hats and puzzle pieces but I’ve been thinking about SJW cows & need to get it off my chest.

Spoiler: MATI

Since I’m new to the farms I’ve spent a lot of time reading threads from start to finish which in some cases meant speedrunning through almost ten years of a cow’s life. SJW threads invariably looks like this:

They start out invested in online bullshit that inherently lack any prosocial features. They subscribe to ideologies that only other autists on the internet can possibly share, meaning that they shun - and tbh are likely shunned by - people around them IRL. Their parents are bewildered & disappointed if not estranged. They spend their formative years when they should be going to college, finding a partner, having children, work, you know, evolving and god damn [insert gay font here] FINDING THEMSELVES digging themselves a hole of increasingly idiotic ideas resulting in dwindling possibilities to actually achieve something in life.

None of them ever seem to cook or work out and then they start ebegging because muh disabilities. Those ridiculous disabilities then become part of their identity, cementing their bleak prospects. If they have sex it’s because they’re in a polycule consisting of one fat woman, a muslim tranny, a furry with cerebral palsy, a horse and a couple of cucks. They never have a stable living arrangement (the horse might have a stable, tho) and they spend whatever money they manage to grift through mutual aid or from gramps on absolute crap. They never have hobbies. If they have goals they are retarded goals like a tranny alpaca farm or SRS or starting a communist coffee shop where only white people have to pay. None of them has ever read a book other than Harry Potter. And then there’s all the fucking weed.

Now, the cows in their thirties and forties, they’re fucked by now and unless their boomer parents die and leave them money, they’re gonna be on welfare or disability and have miserable and lonely lives. I don’t care about them, because it’s too late (but I feel terrible for their kids whenever they accidentally procreate, because of course they never plan it).

I do worry about the younger cows, though, like all the barely legal pooners or the obviously autistic teenage gamers who think they’re trans. They suck too, but hey, I sucked when I was nineteen as well. But I turned out mostly ok (not entirely, I’m here, aren’t I?) because people challenged me when I was wrong and, more importantly, being born in the 70s meant that I never thought the world owed me anything. And back then being a freak of nature that screeched in response to normal human interactions was actually considered both undesirable and impolite. I’m pretty sure someone would have tried to have me committed if I had pulled some of the stuff these kids do WITH PARENTAL CONSENT.

Activists have knowingly pitted these kids against those who could help such as reasonable parents and professionals who actually want to improve their prospects and level of functioning. Instead they are accused of gaslighting or conversion therapy.

I just don’t understand the end game here. I mean, even if there was a communist overthrow of the global order these SJWs would be useless. I wager they’d actually be the first ones to be shot.

Please, make it make sense?

Thank you for attending this TED talk of an old woman yelling at clouds.