What conspiracy theories do you believe in? - Put your tinfoil hats on

[Rembrandt]

This video convinced me

Odd name for a copyright holder to have.

 

[Lemmingwiser]

Odd name for a copyright holder to have.

View attachment 5748809

Here is a new video link to the same video about sandy hook:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/nsiYSFR7SpFq/

 

[Fek]

Though the racial element can not be denied and the colors are not merely a short hand just for any human virtue or vice. Here's why:

Ah, very good. I hadn't seen those prior, and definitely leaves little to no doubt of the intention present in the work. Nice find.

 

[BirdUp]

everything in this video

 

[Lemmingwiser]

Having watched the sandy hook video, I knew there was fuckery, but I didn't know it reached this far.

The whole thing was a scam after all.

The information control was insane.
The number of grieving parents who also had acting videos out there was insane, on top of the parents that were weirdly smiling with duper's delight.

 

[Lemmingwiser]

Can't edit my post above, so making a new one.

Did anyone follow sandy hook closely at the time? I've heard the claim that Alex Jones barely covered it at all, and no depth to it (no surprise there). Just used it as a topic three or four times? If it is the case, it would be a very smart move. I don't consider it unlikely that alex jones is a type of controlled opposition. Having him cooperate in being deplatformed and sued sends an excellent message. Better to sue someone who you control, so you control the entire situation. It also makes sandy hook look more legit if a court case supports it this way.

Nevermind that Sandy Hook FBI statistics for Newtown in 2012 had 0 murders.

 

[Señora Airi]

- Organized religion could be a satanic deception.

I'll do you one better: the schism in 1054, as well as the Protestant Reformations, were Jewish/Satanic psyops in order to weaken the west.

here is something uniquely special about the human soul (or whatever you want to call it) that makes higher beings (God, aliens, whatever) fight for it. It even says in the Bible that God is a jealous God and wants us all to himself. Well, why is he jealous if he could just make everyone love him? Maybe because he can’t. He has to fight for our souls, because there is something about our souls he wants/needs and so do others like him. There are multiple parties at war for your soul, but we are blind to most of it.

He is a jealous God, but jealous in the sense that he wants you to love Him in your own free will.

 

[VeteranOfTheRetardWars]

Conspiracy Theories I Share With My Friends:
Aliens
Lost Civilizations
Antarctica
Sea Anomalies
The Moon
Cults (the funny ones)

Conspiracy Theories I Don’t Share With My Friends:
((()))
Cults (the real ones)
9/11
False Flag Shootings
Banks
Epstein and Epstein-esuqe Activity
Any Political Anything

 

[Perun]

Can't edit my post above, so making a new one.

Did anyone follow sandy hook closely at the time? I've heard the claim that Alex Jones barely covered it at all, and no depth to it (no surprise there). Just used it as a topic three or four times? If it is the case, it would be a very smart move. I don't consider it unlikely that alex jones is a type of controlled opposition. Having him cooperate in being deplatformed and sued sends an excellent message. Better to sue someone who you control, so you control the entire situation. It also makes sandy hook look more legit if a court case supports it this way.

Nevermind that Sandy Hook FBI statistics for Newtown in 2012 had 0 murders.
View attachment 5753563
View attachment 5753569

I think alex jones being controlled opposition is obvious, at least i have always dismissed him. Miles Mathis argued that all those trials he's in are fake, though idk anything about law or how court proceedings are supposed to go so i don't know how good his claims are. He might be controlled opposition himself too though. Don't think any of those shootings ever hold up to scrutiny.

 

[Candlelight Desolation]

Here are four I can think of off the top of my head:

1. FDR absolutely knew Pearl Harbor would happen and let it happen so he would have a justification to enter a war he desperately wanted to join from the start. FDR was a Woodrow Wilson man, and the latter had a massive messiah complex and entered the US into WW1 despite there being really no reason for it. All of the anti-German propaganda was recycled in both Wilson and Roosevelt administrations, which made the populace hyped up to go into Germany. The propaganda machine never shut off after the world wars, which is why interventionism is still very much a thing the US does despite Lyndon Johnson (an FDR guy) signing off on that disaster in Vietnam by doing a false flag attack in the Gulf of Tonkin. See also: baby incubators and WMDs. I wouldn't be surprised if 9/11 itself was another deliberate intelligence failure that was let happen. I've also heard rumors that Bin Laden died in 2002 of kidney failure, and the guy they killed in Pakistan was a patsy.
   
   
2. Operation Blue Beam, meaning a staged alien invasion, is going to be used sometime in the future to get the masses in line permanently through fear. Consider all of the UFO disclosures from the Obama years to now is definitely building up to something, but exactly what it is remains to be seen. TPTB know how to use emotion in order to get people to think a certain way - most people's more vivid memories are tied to strong emotions. This is part of why commercials are made with the sad or energetic music with the imagery to tug at people's heartstrings to get people to vote/spend money a certain way or support specific causes (think "current thing" phenomenons like BLM, covid masks and jabs, Ukraine). They can easily do the same thing with a staged alien invasion via fearmongering or large-scale attacks blamed on fictional space aliens.
   
   
3. Lots of mega-corporations are in bed with political lobbying groups tied to globalist politicians in various first world nations, and they get paid to produce commercials, whether overtly or through subliminal implication, which promote miscegenation or troon stuff or DEI. TPTB know that most people watch TV and are influenced by ads, which is why you see things like gay and interracial couples in commercials and other things like picture ads or sample pictures in frames which are on sale, like a young couple with a mulatto child. You see this in movies and streaming services, too. If people are exposed to something like this on a daily basis, they'll be more willing to go along with it if they feel like this is "normal" and that they're doing the "right thing". This ties into mass importation of the third world into developed first world countries.
   
   
4. Most "hate crimes" and youth who do mass shootings are groomed into that by the feds. The running theme with a lot of these "hate criminals" is that they are mentally unstable, or they otherwise have minds which make them susceptible to that kind of peer pressure. Think of fedposts you see on honeypot parts of the Internet like /pol/ or Twitter or similar places. The feds know they can groom these people to commit these kinds of violent acts. They do this to farm arrests so they can give political lobbying groups bogus hate crime statistics as well as justification to clamp down on both the Internet and people's freedoms in the first world so they can control the narrative even more without the freedom of spreading information on the Internet and speech and, as I said, crack down on the masses harder even though the NPCs don't realize it. The NPCs themselves think "right wing extremists" are a real threat because cable news and late night talk shows tell them that, which is a lie these outlets tell to cover the tracks of the feds and create a threat which is not really there.

 

[VeteranOfTheRetardWars]

Here is a new video link to the same video about sandy hook:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/nsiYSFR7SpFq/

Based on my personal research into Adam Lanza, I believe he did or at least planned to shoot up Sandy Hook.
However, that video raises a lot of legit questions.
I don’t what the fuck went on, but it’s weird.

 

[Gondolindrim]

Operation Blue Beam, meaning a staged alien invasion, is going to be used sometime in the future to get the masses in line permanently through fear. Consider all of the UFO disclosures from the Obama years to now is definitely building up to something, but exactly what it is remains to be seen. TPTB know how to use emotion in order to get people to think a certain way - most people's more vivid memories are tied to strong emotions. This is part of why commercials are made with the sad or energetic music with the imagery to tug at people's heartstrings to get people to vote/spend money a certain way or support specific causes (think "current thing" phenomenons like BLM, covid masks and jabs, Ukraine). They can easily do the same thing with a staged alien invasion via fearmongering or large-scale attacks blamed on fictional space aliens.

I doubt that only because it's so obvious. We live in a time where trust in the American government is falling at a dizzying rate, most people are not going to buy a fake alien invasion from the same people who locked us down for 2 years.

 

[VeteranOfTheRetardWars]

I doubt that only because it's so obvious. We live in a time where trust in the American government is falling at a dizzying rate, most people are not going to buy a fake alien invasion from the same people who locked us down for 2 years.

Bluebeam is not ever going to actually work because it's main plan runs so completely contrary to human nature that it's basically retard sci-fi. The first week of an alien invasion would more likely dissolve social cohesion and authority than have people go "oh shit nigga I better sign up for the Space Force, change my religion, and join the New World Order".
What's actually true is that certain "theories" are pushed one way or another to get people talking about aliens and flat Earth and shit rather than important real shit.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

I still don't know why there's such a push to deny the reality of the sexes in Clown World.

Someone at some point pointed out that a male-to-female transgender "is a woman" but might still have a penis if they haven't gotten around to getting it cut off yet. So any pregnancy or menstruation article addressed to "women" didn't accurately describe this miniscule population's situation. Vice versa for FTMs.

A followup question: why is straight male sexuality seemingly demonized, in Clown World?

Is it part of some population reduction agenda? And why is male sexuality targeted more?

(also calling @Drain Todger and @Save the Loli)

 

[Drain Todger]

A followup question: why is straight male sexuality seemingly demonized, in Clown World?

Is it part of some population reduction agenda? And why is male sexuality targeted more?

(also calling @Drain Todger and @Save the Loli)

The ruling class are very Neo-Malthusian and anti-natalist. You ever hear Bill Gates or Ted Turner talk about overpopulation? They've all read Ehrlich's The Population Bomb. They think humans are locusts. Demonizing straight sexuality, providing widespread access to contraceptives and abortion, promoting LGBT, pushing women into the workforce, and denying access to home ownership are all population control measures that the Elites have explicitly described in their own literature.

Here's the Kissinger Report from '74, which was declassified in '89:

https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pcaab500.pdf

Here's the Jaffe Memo from '67:

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-10-25-lgbt-agenda-always-about-population-control-memo.html

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B0KCqtNShmxgYTA1REcxai1OME0/view?resourcekey=0-qliJBd6Jgnczp1-tsH2z_A

Does anyone really think the Rothschilds and the Rockefellers and their ilk really give two shits about poor fags? On the contrary. If one of their own children ever expressed same-sex desires or even the slightest aversion to producing another generation of rich incest babies, they'd take them out in the hedge maze in their backyard and beat them senseless with a riding crop.

 

[ToroidalBoat]

the Kissinger Report from '74

Isn't that around the same time that BS like "objectification" and "the male gaze" were made up?

 

[Drain Todger]

Isn't that around the same time that BS like "objectification" and "the male gaze" were made up?

That is exactly the same time period.

https://theconversation.com/explainer-what-does-the-male-gaze-mean-and-what-about-a-female-gaze-52486

The “male gaze” invokes the sexual politics of the gaze and suggests a sexualised way of looking that empowers men and objectifies women. In the male gaze, woman is visually positioned as an “object” of heterosexual male desire. Her feelings, thoughts and her own sexual drives are less important than her being “framed” by male desire.

A key idea of feminist film theory, the concept of the male gaze was introduced by scholar and filmmaker Laura Mulvey in her now famous 1975 essay, Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.

The essay PDF can be read here:

https://www.amherst.edu/system/files/media/1021/Laura%20Mulvey%2C%20Visual%20Pleasure.pdf

 

[ToroidalBoat]

essay PDF

Framing a guy being sexually aroused by a gal as "objectifying" her is really wrong, and can be demoralizing (perhaps to both sexes).

 

[Drain Todger]

Framing a guy being sexually aroused by a gal as "objectifying" her is really wrong, and can be demoralizing (perhaps to both sexes).

Laura Mulvey's analysis was basically framing the interaction in metaphysical terms, specifically in the context of cinema. In other words, her argument was that the way some movies are shot seems to exclusively emphasize the perspective of a voyeuristic male eye, actively peering upon passive female bodies, which are regarded as lacking an active, mind-like quality of any kind. In other words, she was pointing out that there was a pattern, in movies, of the camera's perspective taking on a sort of peeping-tom-like role, where you'd have some James Bond-like masculine figure admiring a woman's curves from afar while she preens herself, like the guy is a hunter on a safari and she's some game animal he spied through his binos. In short, in movies, males browse, while females just sort of vegetate, like they're a part of the scenery and not characters in their own right. Her complaint was not that the "male gaze" was bad, but that there was no equivalent female gaze which depicted women as agentic and men as scenery. Moreover, she wasn't saying that men IRL who look at women that they're sexually attracted to are automatically reducing them to objects simply in the act of looking, however, the meaning of the "male gaze" was later expanded to encompass that. It is incredibly demoralizing, and it invokes the Spotlight Effect, where people become extremely self-conscious about small details of their bodies that other people might not even notice.

Why is male sexuality exclusively demonized instead of demonizing female sexuality in order to achieve the goal of population control by making people too anxious to mate normally? Simple. It's piss-easy. Just cite rape statistics. "1 in 5 women will suffer rape, 91% of victims are female, 99% of perpetrators are male". Imagine walking around the city at night as a woman with those numbers drilled into your head. That is a recipe for constant androphobia and poor mental health. It's really, really hard to convince men that all women are terrifying sex pests who are going to drag them off into a dark alleyway for some snu-snu. It's not hard to convince women of the reverse case and to cite statistics supporting the notion that men are dangerous, violent, and predatory.

Ever read Richard Wrangham and Dale Peterson's Demonic Males: Apes and the Origins of Human Violence? Yes, the titles of these sorts of sociology tomes really are that on-the-nose. And I guarantee you, all of these annoying SocJus college kids have read them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demonic_Males

Demonic Males begins by explaining that humans, chimpanzees, gorillas and orangutans are a group of genetically related great apes, that humans are genetically closer to chimps than chimps are to gorillas, and that chimps and bonobos are most closely genetically related. After speculating about what enabled humans' ancestors to leave the rainforest (the use of roots as sources of water and food), Demonic Males next provides a catalog of the types of violence practiced by male chimpanzees (intragroup hierarchical violence, violence against females, and extragroup murdering raids). The high incidence of rape by non-alpha male orangutans and infanticide by male gorillas are also cited as examples of our mutual genetic heritage.

The authors present chimp society as extremely patriarchal, in that no adult male chimpanzee is subordinate to any female of any rank. They present evidence that most dominant human civilizations have always been likewise behaviorally patriarchal, and that male humans share male chimpanzees' innate propensity for dominance, gratuitous violence, war, rape, and murder. They claim that the brain's prefrontal cortex is also a factor, as humans have been shown experimentally to make decisions based both on logic and prefrontal cortex-mediated emotion.

To contrast chimp societies, in the chapter "The Peaceful Ape", the authors contrast chimpanzee behaviors with those of the bonobo, presenting logical biological reasons for the more pacific (although also aggressive and antagonistic) behaviors of the latter. Reasons given for this include a bonobo female social organization that does not tolerate male aggression, the evolutionary forces of the invisibility of bonobo ovulation (in chimps, ovulation has both olfactory and genital swelling manifestations — this diversity in female reproductive cycles then leads to ferocious male competition for mating), and overall social organization, whereby male bonobos do not form alliances as male chimps do, though this has been contested.[4]

 

[ToroidalBoat]

In short, in movies, males browse, while females just sort of vegetate, like they're a part of the scenery and not characters in their own right.

I think what naturally happens there is that guy sees hot gal and gets aroused. That's it. In other words, seems that "browsing-vegetating" dynamic is an early example of making up convoluted or overthinking BS motives -- a tactic used by SJWs to this day.