"Current year" terms that piss you off

  • Thread starter Thread starter AF 802
  • Start date Start date
I saw a whole Healthline article that used "vulva owner" in lieu of "woman", and it reads so horribly unnatural and clunky that it made me feel like a retard for ever using Healthline for nutrition/fitness info. I remember seeing it as an exaggerated meme a few years ago but didn't realize people were actually writing like this. They really put the cart in front of the horse when they decided to write 100% inclusively before having a better backup plan than "people who own vulvas" to plug into their search and replace.

If I hear one more fucking child that goes "hot take" or "bad take" or anything with the word "take" in it referring to a retarded opinion while spouting their own retarded opinion believe me those faggots won't know what hit them over the fucking head.
I miss when people had opinions and thoughts instead of takes.
 
THEY TURNED GOON INTO A SEX THING :(
Oh and "gyat" I don't know who the fuck came up with that but anyone who says gyat should be shot on sight
Oh don't even fucking get me started on that.
I don't give a shit what twisted fucking definition "goon" supposedly has now. It has only one definition: "The cheapest shit ass boxed white wine, which is usually pegged to a clothes line and spun around in a game of "who can get the most wasted"".
 
I still don't know why there's such a push to deny the reality of the sexes in Clown World.
Someone at some point pointed out that a male-to-female transgender "is a woman" but might still have a penis if they haven't gotten around to getting it cut off yet. So any pregnancy or menstruation article addressed to "women" didn't accurately describe this miniscule population's situation. Vice versa for FTMs.

99+% of people reacted to this by saying "not my problem" or "fuck off" or "uhhh what?", and the other <1% reacted by deciding to use "penis owner" and "people who own vulvas" in their lexicon with a straight face.

Whether the article writers genuinely believe they're progressing language or are just afraid of a lynch mob if they don't capitulate is anyone's guess.
 
I saw a whole Healthline article that used "vulva owner" in lieu of "woman", and it reads so horribly unnatural and clunky that it made me feel like a retard for ever using Healthline for nutrition/fitness info. I remember seeing it as an exaggerated meme a few years ago but didn't realize people were actually writing like this. They really put the cart in front of the horse when they decided to write 100% inclusively before having a better backup plan than "people who own vulvas" to plug into their search and replace.


I miss when people had opinions and thoughts instead of takes.
I'm convinced the only way out of this is to bring back the apex 1850 era, mustache twirling dumbass calling people colored people and insisting that the proper term for a vulva owner is vulva owned, then slapping the nearest married guy on the arm and going "wives amiright?"

Apparently they were a valuable part of the ecosystem. We need to bring them back in to graze the grass.
 
"Content".
Movies, novels, poetry, video games, Tweets, video clips of screaming bearded reprobates opining on video games, essays, songs, tax returns, dialog, photographs, paintings, animation, live video, advertising.
It's all just fucking content. People say that they "consume content" without a hint of irony. Do you watch movies? Play games? Watch hours of dead air cause you're waiting for a man in a hoodie to say "wwooooahh!!" because something happened in a video game? Nah, everything is just content.
 
love (as used by SJWs):

As used by SJWs, "love" seems to mean that which is new ("woke"), as opposed to that which is old (AKA "hate" or "white supremacy").
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: UnsufficentBoobage
"Content".
Movies, novels, poetry, video games, Tweets, video clips of screaming bearded reprobates opining on video games, essays, songs, tax returns, dialog, photographs, paintings, animation, live video, advertising.
It's all just fucking content. People say that they "consume content" without a hint of irony. Do you watch movies? Play games? Watch hours of dead air cause you're waiting for a man in a hoodie to say "wwooooahh!!" because something happened in a video game? Nah, everything is just content.
Whenever I hear someone refer to themselves as a "content creator" I get the same vague irritation as I did as a kid when "widget factory" was the default example of a business in a test at school.
 
"Content".
Movies, novels, poetry, video games, Tweets, video clips of screaming bearded reprobates opining on video games, essays, songs, tax returns, dialog, photographs, paintings, animation, live video, advertising.
It's all just fucking content. People say that they "consume content" without a hint of irony. Do you watch movies? Play games? Watch hours of dead air cause you're waiting for a man in a hoodie to say "wwooooahh!!" because something happened in a video game? Nah, everything is just content.
Isn't this the exact same thing Apple did to "Applications", "Programs", "Software", "Executables", etc etc? fuck its been that long i forgot half the terms that were all replaced by a singular vonacular sound:

"App".

almost the same sound that's made when I drop that couple thousand dollar phone like 2 cm only to watch it break beyond repair...
 
Thread tax: "sex worker" as a term that encompasses both e-thots and streetwalkers. There is a significant difference in cam whores who control who sees what and individuals who are trafficked or otherwise forced into sexual service with zero control over what happens to them. To combine the groups and claim that "sex work" is empowering when that's not true for those forced into prostitution is disingenuous and indicative of the bullshit normies are expected to accept as absolute truth
Other problem is that a lot of streetwalkers are willing, and we cannot be admitting wanting to be a whore is bad.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Kiwi Lime Pie
I'm sick and tired of the constant attempts by the "woke" to "gaslight" people into being "woke" in general, by constantly making up BS motives for non-SJWs, demonizing non-SJWs, or just claiming that non-SJWs are all delusional idiots. It can be demoralizing to be constantly exposed to that BS, which I think is what the SJWs want: a "struggle session" to BS the world into being like California.
 
Back