- Joined
- Jan 12, 2017
"Romantasy" is such a dumbass combination that it only makes sense some Millennial shipper came up with it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Side note, but Yarros' books are huge hits, bookstores are fucking filled to the brim with copies of both books, they have the coveted "as seen on TikTok!" sign next to them, etc etc...re: Maas. I wonder how long it took for a Harry Potter book to fall to # 5 on the NYT bestseller list? That's where Maas' book is, three weeks after release. Impressive as hell, something most writers would likely sell their grandmother's soul to Satan for, but I suspect nowhere near Rowling territory. Admittedly I'm spitballing here, but I thought Rowling's presence on bestseller lists was measured in month or more likely years.
View attachment 5756514
>romantasy is well writtenInterestingly, this podcast just came out and mentioned Romantasy: "Richard reveals some juicy details about his forthcoming new book but before then he and Marina delve into the world of 'romantasy', the genre which is taking up space on bookshelves at great pace."
Pretty sure spicy romance has always outsold anything else. Women are the majority of readers and the written word is how they consume most of their porn.The Romantasy authors are basically outselling everyone else who has released a book in the last few years.
Sounds like she knows her audience then.but the main criticism seems to center around her writing like a 14 year old on wattpad.
There's a few of these going around. Naver launched Yonder semi-recently, for example, and much of their business model was microtransactions for books that you could buy in one payment on Amazon (or just read for free online.) Do these platforms really make money? How much of it ends up with the creatives? What are the contracts like? Who looks at Galatea and thinks throwing thirty-five million dollars into it is a good idea? Galatea's front page when I looked at in the wake of this announcement was just Claimed By The Werewolf, Breaking the Billionaire Baby Daddy, My Brooding Mafia Boss shit.Inkitt - a Watpad clone, has been given $35 million dollars in seed money to develop their "bestseller creation" business.
They've been around for a while, they are a little more adult that Wattpad but they are an easier platform to monetise via their Galatea app.
No surprises as to what gets monetised. Yep, erotica and romantasy.
And of course Amazon picked it up to adapt. Lol. Lmao even.Fourth Wing, from the very first line, makes it clear it's just a Hunger Games rip-off and then becomes a Harry Potter ripoff (with dragons and smut.) The most liked review on Goodreads is a one star review. Trekkor is pointing out an interesting phenomenon that what unites writers like Yarros and Maas is that even their devoted readers who post reviews agree that the books are just bad and generally just rip-off elements from other series.
I was wondering about that one. I have dithered about getting it from Libgen (my general place to try books, I'll pay money if I like it), but haven't gotten around to doing so.The last "booktok" novel I read was Priory of the Orange Tree and that's twenty bucks I never get back. Good marketing strategy, but not so good works of art. Outside of the koolaid platform, most people seem to agree that these books are merely mediocre, even for young adults media.
There is no pleasing them. If an established author tries to include more gay characters, they are always doing it wrong, and their insane readers will find faults if they don't explicitly label a relationship in the text with the Modern-Day Terms. It doesn't matter if you're writing characters who are toxic, or closeted, or historical, or whatever, if the characters don't use the proper terminology, they are Problematic.For quite some time, the average Gen Z even admitting that they found a heterosexual pairing in fiction hot has been considered “problematic” and “heteronormative”.
First half is decent, but second half and especially ending suffer from severe pacing issues. There are some interesting elements and ideas (and dragons) but it's not a book I would recommend to fans of fantasy literature.I was wondering about that one. I have dithered about getting it from Libgen (my general place to try books, I'll pay money if I like it), but haven't gotten around to doing so.
After the success of Twilight and 50 Shades I would also write that stuff if I were to make a living out of writing. Nothing beats some good old romance, no matter how cheesy it is written.For quite some time, the average Gen Z even admitting that they found a heterosexual pairing in fiction hot has been considered “problematic” and “heteronormative”. All the girlies were saying they wanted sapphic shit publicly, while in reality they were secretly reading about Biggus Dikkus or whatever….
There are decades and centuries worth of literature more worth my money and more importantly my time, than anything on that list. So no, I don't plan to read anything YA this year.Now I'm curious. How many of us have read or plan to read at least one new YA book this year?
Are you asking if a leftie/sjw will throw a white men or whites in general under the bus if give a chance? Because the answer is yes. Old habits die hard and all.I’m not as clued in on the modern literature community as people here are, so can you tell me if there’s still the regular blaming of huwyte male writers/audiences for problems in the genre as there was 5-10 years ago? I figure the genre becoming dominated by women both audience and creator renders that criticism irrelevant but idiots have never let reality get in the way of a favourable narrative.