Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 156 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.3%

  • Total voters
    465
What's the actual likely hood of this going through?
Slim to none. The court is asked to review 7000 cases per year and they only take on about 100-150. Josh is not wrong about it being literally 1%.

It'd be really funny if they did take it though.

EDIT: I got ninja'd by Josh posting a pic for proof and someone else. Damn.
 
But what suit size will you buy, fat boy?
Only the best will do for Our Guy
Ronald_mcdonald.png
 
Given how legal scholars have pointed out how much shit got fucked up as a result of the Appellate Court's decision, I imagine some SCOTUS clerk's at least heard of it.

Never underestimate the SCOTUS clerks. (We're pretty sure it was one of them who leaked Dobbs, right?) They're younger and presumably more tech-savvy than any of the actual Justices, and could conceivably impress upon a few of them that this might be important to look at.
 
So, if I'm reading this schedule info for the SCOTUS right, which I'm probably not. It looks like there's 30 days for Greer to file a brief in opposition, or waive that right. Then 14 more days for a reply to that. Then it gets on the conference schedule and they meet about it a couple weeks later(varies). So a few months at least before we'd know anything.
 
Last edited:
Never underestimate the SCOTUS clerks. (We're pretty sure it was one of them who leaked Dobbs, right?) They're younger and presumably more tech-savvy than any of the actual Justices, and could conceivably impress upon a few of them that this might be important to look at.
The way this works on the inside is that most justices have their clerks be part of “the pool” from which petitions for cert are randomly assigned to chambers. Then the clerks in each chamber take each petition and write a memo explaining the petition and recommending what to do. That then goes out to each chamber, and the justices decide whether to grant cert or not. While they are supposed to review independently the case and come to their own conclusion, the original memo is obviously going to hold sway.

What this means is that it’s totally possible for some absolute NPC libcuck working for someone like Sotomayor to look at KF, decide the Court should do the opposite of what’s in Josh’s interest, and recommend that to the entire Court. That isn’t dispositive, but it is a structural disadvantage for Josh.
 
if they make me fly back i'm buying a buccee's tie and that's what i'm wearing to court
Whatever you do, don't eat one of their briskets right before sitting for the case. You know, unless you want to be literally the first person (since RBG) to shit yourself in the middle of a SCOTUS case.
 
Last edited:
Back