This is a problem with many millennial writers today. It is especially prominent in female writers. From a young age girls would usually self-insert themselves into characters into their play pretend while boys become those characters. Case in point a boy would become Spider-Man in his play while a girl would have Spider-Man sit at the table having a tea party. Women just have a harder time sympathizing with a character unless they can relate to them in some way.
based, but gonna have to wait and see if valve has a shitsperg about it when too many people report it as "toxic and problematic"...
"Oh spiderman, you dreamy hunk. I'm so glad you came to my party. Would you like more tea? Have you met Mrs. Nesbitt?"
I'm reminded of "Kate Leth had bed bugs, so she wrote Hellcat having bed bugs".
I'm all for writing what you know, but that's just stupid. It doesn't make me feel sorry for the character or anything, it just reminds me that bed bugs suck.
The shittiest writers never have an ability to self-critique. If someone wants to write good stories, they have to be willing to see the flaws in their writing. But I guess the writing field is dominated by the HUWHITE MAN, or something.
The thing is that any English teacher worth their salt will tell their students that self-insertion is to be avoided at all times when writing a story unless you are writing a autobiography. Nothing wrong with being inspired by your real life experiences when writing a story. Many of the battles in the Lord of the Rings trilogy were inspired by battles that Tolkien witnessed or fought in during the first World War. Or To Kill a Mockingbird which was inspired by Harper Lee's life growing up in Alabama during the late 1930's. Problem is that a lot of writers today, like Kim Belair, have "Main Character Syndrome". They need to self-insert themselves in everything they write otherwise they can't relate to the characters or story. There is a reason why self-insertion fanfic is hated and despised.
It's not even limited to games
It's this type of crap that gives rise to grifting retards who claim the (minority, female, tranny, disabled, etc.) audience can't relate to the <thing> unless their specific group is overrepresented. It's one step away from being an actual npc.
That was actually in the show? Jesus Christ.
Unless this inbred retard has evidence of the curator inciting harassment, I don't think they've got a case. The dumbass would have posted it. Even saying something is "tainted" isn't actionable imo. It's the same as saying something is shit which is the whole point of curators. They're opening themselves up to even more negative attention by doing this. And as par for the course, they're inciting harassment towards the curator, despite the unfounded claims of the curator doing exactly that. The race grifter truly does cry out in pain as he/she/xit strikes you.
Good. That's exactly what needs to happen.
BlaX womyn literally wants to deprive a chud of his vidya. Human rights violation.
But money laundering is a low profile, controversy-free front for something else. This is the opposite of low profile and controversy-free - they're extremely controversial and work in a highly-public field.
I'll like to point out that this mentally ill freak chimping out at this curator group help the curator grow by several thousands in the last couple hours. They are now at 13,000 Curator Followers on Steam. Talk about the Streisand Effect in action.
That's not very tolerant of him.
