Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[1Tonka_Truck]

This is the time in Blackjack when you actually DO put it all on green, fuck red and black.

I'm going to take this as confirmation Mormons are disallowed from gambling.

 

[Cats]

Yeah get em ! Fuck em up the ass* !!




*(non homosex. Power Domanition,primal animals behaviour, ect. )

 

[WelperHelper99]

Are you kidding? This case implicates some pretty huge questions of copyright in the digital era. If the USSC takes it up, Greer v. Moon will be cited on pretty much every copyright case in America going foreword. Shit lips will be FAMOUS. Famous FOREVER.

But if he loses, he's just a famous loser that SCOTUS said was stupid. That's the worst kind of fame.

I am not optimistic.

On one hand, the Republican judge majority who tend to be much more pro 1st amendment and more objective than hyper-partisan judges in lower courts.
On the other hand, Republican judges and politicians have shown in the past that if given a choice between the 1st amendment and helping big businesses line their pockets, they will chose big business every single time.

Also, courts have previously ruled the 1st amendment doesn't protect copyright infringement. Unless SCOTUS wants to fuck off Stare Decisis like they did when they repealed Roe, no way they will rule differently here.

No dooming faggot, we're doing this, we're gonna make it

 

[Stoneheart]

there are more errors than a single typo, but they're easily forgiven due to the sheer complexity of the petition.

This was work for free right?
If not Error are not acceptable, those fuckers get paid hundred of $ per hour.

 

[WelperHelper99]

I'm going to take this as confirmation Mormons are disallowed from gambling.

Yes. All my knowledge comes from Bossman Jack

 

[Pedophobe]

I am not optimistic.

The way I see it is, if the courts really want to burn down the barns of the Karen Farms it's going to take the whole of the Internet with it.

If this goes ahead either the 10th circuit decision gets rejected by the SC and the mediacorpos have to go back to the drawing board, or it becomes the law of the land and everyone gets thrown in the shitbucket along with KF.

It's a terrible precedent and not Null's personal problem to have to fix but he's pursuing it anyway for the love of the capital-I.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

I'm still rolling that this quite possibly means Greer is suing a piece of inanimate computer hardware since the site is hosted on a server. The wording is so fucking ass.

It’s worse than that. It’s suing the bytes themselves - not the hardware, but the software data, the soul.

Are you kidding? This case implicates some pretty huge questions of copyright in the digital era. If the USSC takes it up, Greer v. Moon will be cited on pretty much every copyright case in America going foreword. Shit lips will be FAMOUS. Famous FOREVER.

Amusingly enough, if it goes to supremes and even if Greer gets shut down forever, he’d be much more likely to get laid, even if just by stupid lawyer interns. lol

 

[Anti Snigger]

As far as us being of use, is there anything we can do? I know in advocating for legislation, you can call your congressman or senator, but is there some reasonable equivalent for a SCOTUS case?
I don't mean anything juvenile or a nuisance, I'd just like to be able to signal my views as a US citizen in support of this.

Like, my proverbial wagon is ready to collect tin for the effort, sir.

 

[Betonhaus]

Godspeed you madlad.

I wonder how biased the court artist will be?

I'd like to think they would take it. It's too weird of a case with severe implications for them to not to.

Is Null going to bring a server rack to represent Kiwifarms to the court?

 

[Null]

As far as us being of use, is there anything we can do? I know in advocating for legislation, you can call your congressman or senator, but is there some reasonable equivalent for a SCOTUS case?

No, the Supreme Court is famously immune to autistic screeching.

 

[Anti Snigger]

No, the Supreme Court is famously immune to autistic screeching.

Would a giant bag of letters to Kiwi Claus help or does that only work in movies?

 

[Jerry's Magic Ring]

It’s good that Null appealed the decision to the Supreme Court, but I’ll temper my expectations to nothing unless we find out they take the case.

Hoping for the best.

 

[Ass to Ass]

A USSC petition does not pause the clocks because almost no writs are accepted.

Here's hoping your writ is accepted. I wanna see you kick the woke crowd's ass.

 

[Imagine Reading This LOL]

No dooming faggot, we're doing this, we're gonna make it

I'm not dooming. I'm hoping SCOTUS actually does something. I'm just being realistic. SCOTUS will hear an oral arguments for 1% of petitions for certiorari and even if SCOTUS hears arguments, its a coin toss on whenever SCOTUS will side with Null or not.

Be realistic. Temper your expectations.

 

[doodoocaca]

No, the Supreme Court is famously immune to autistic screeching.

What about an amicus brief breaking down all the procedural bullshit and nonsense and lying and complete gobbledygook and threats to free speech and lefty bullshit?

I'm serious. Would it even cross a justice's desk, or just some intern?

 

[thegunbuilderguy]

Josh has petitioned SCOTUS for a writ of certiorari over the appellate decision.

Spoiler: Full petition as .JPG

View attachment 5769640View attachment 5769641View attachment 5769643View attachment 5769644View attachment 5769645View attachment 5769646View attachment 5769648View attachment 5769649View attachment 5769650View attachment 5769652View attachment 5769653View attachment 5769654View attachment 5769656View attachment 5769657View attachment 5769658View attachment 5769659View attachment 5769660View attachment 5769661View attachment 5769662View attachment 5769663View attachment 5769665View attachment 5769666View attachment 5769667View attachment 5769668View attachment 5769669View attachment 5769670View attachment 5769671View attachment 5769672View attachment 5769673View attachment 5769674View attachment 5769675View attachment 5769676View attachment 5769677View attachment 5769678View attachment 5769679View attachment 5769680View attachment 5769681View attachment 5769682View attachment 5769683View attachment 5769684View attachment 5769685View attachment 5769686View attachment 5769687

Josh: "I do stuff because it'll be funny"
this: *bland as shit*

HERE's a petition with some chest hair!:

 

[Null]

When the 10th asked for an answer that was extremely unlikely too. The fact they didn't do en banc after asking for an answer is even rarer than doing it. We're already very firmly in wtf territory.

 

[Imagine Reading This LOL]

What about an amicus brief breaking down all the procedural bullshit and nonsense and lying and complete gobbledygook and threats to free speech and lefty bullshit?

I'm serious. Would it even cross a justice's desk, or just some intern?

SCOTUS does not give two shits about Amicus briefs. They will glance over the executive summary at best. Its a tool to gauge sentiment from demographics and business entities, not to help SCOTUS decide the case.

Hardin's petition already has everything an amicus brief would have anyway.

 

[LaxerBRO]

So on the outside chance this case is granted cert, are the attorneys that the Farms are using admitted to the Supreme Court Bar?

Otherwise, I don't think they can argue the case

 

[Null]

So on the outside chance this case is granted cert, are the attorneys that the Farms are using admitted to the Supreme Court Bar?

Otherwise, I don't think they can argue the case

You have to be admitted to file bro