Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Banana Hammock]

No, the Supreme Court is famously immune to autistic screeching.

And thank God for that.

 

[inception_state]

I hope this gets cert just so Google, Cloudflare, and all the other shitty tech companies have to file amicus briefs in support of the farms. They don't like us, but this dumb decision is a potential business risk for search engines and other internet services.

 

[Mimic]

Godspeed, you magnificent bastard.

 

[WelperHelper99]

I'm not dooming. I'm hoping SCOTUS actually does something. I'm just being realistic. SCOTUS will hear an oral arguments for 1% of petitions for certiorari and even if SCOTUS hears arguments, its a coin toss on whenever SCOTUS will side with Null or not.

Be realistic. Temper your expectations.

Realism will get us nowhere. We need some of that Bossman rizz, pure diamond hands, a miracle. And miracles are built on hope, the opposite of reality. We WILL win, just you watch.

 

[mindlessobserver]

Realism will get us nowhere. We need some of that Bossman rizz, pure diamond hands, a miracle. And miracles are built on hope, the opposite of reality. We WILL win, just you watch.

This is Clown world, and it would be funny if this webzone goes to the Supreme Court because of the same guy who sued Taylor Swift for a date. Sheogorath wills it.

 

[Harvey Danger]

The way I see it is, if the courts really want to burn down the barns of the Karen Farms it's going to take the whole of the Internet with it.

They can also just ignore the appeal, kick the can down the road, and deal with any serious case where it comes up again. They may wait for a better set of facts, or a broader issue, to establish some lasting precedents on copyrights, and just give whatever excuse to ignore this appeal.

That's not what they're supposed to do when you have contradictory rulings like what the 10th did. They're supposed to resolve the conflict to provide clarity for all cases going forward. But if SCOTUS did everything it's supposed to do, we wouldn't have Obamacare or a President Biden.

 

[Johnny Clyde Cash]

I had a hearty smuckle at this part.



Sargon's old case against that one Youtube SJW is now acting as precedent to help out the Farms. Stepfather's 20 Year Plan is unfolding masterfully.

Maybe Null can borrow one of Carl's suits if this writ gets accepted and he has to go to court. Just make sure to get it dry cleaned to get all the Applebees steak sauce out.

 

[WelperHelper99]

I had a hearty smuckle at this part.

View attachment 5770290

Sargon's old case against that one Youtube SJW is now acting as precedent to help out the Farms. Stepfather's 20 Year Plan is unfolding masterfully.

Maybe Null can borrow one of Carl's suits if this writ gets accepted and he has to go to court. Just make sure to get it dry cleaned to get all the Applebees steak sauce out.

Sargon better talk about this on the Lotus Eaters, I'm gonna laugh my ass off if the king of Applebee's talks about our humble fruit farm

 

[Not At All A Lizard]

As a vital digital component of "Kiwi farms, a website", I demand to represent myself and mine in the Supremo Court. Me and my family require accommodations in the form of flies and a place to bask in the sun. I also want to sit next to John Goodman.

 

[Things Once Remembered]

Jersh I offer the best words of encouragement a blue collar man can.

Fuck em in the neck.

 

[Null]

Sargon's old case against that one Youtube SJW is now acting as precedent to help out the Farms. Stepfather's 20 Year Plan is unfolding masterfully.

I insisted this be referenced.

 

[Ebony Odogaron]

Are supreme court things televised/streamed or at least recorded?

is there a chance, however small, that we'll see josh in court with a slobbermutt tie calling greer a whoremonger?

No cameras allowed in the SCOTUS under any circumstances, I believe. I wish we could see that event, however.

 

[Random Internet Person]

No cameras allowed in the SCOTUS under any circumstances, I believe. I wish we could see that event, however.

And then we get the running of the interns.

 

[waffle]

Did anything get put on PACER or get e-mailed to Hardin before 5 local today? I guess we'll probably have to wait until tomorrow to see due to Russ's consistent refusal to do service/certificates right.

 

[Fields Of Rye]

I am not optimistic.

On one hand, the Republican judge majority who tend to be much more pro 1st amendment and more objective than hyper-partisan judges in lower courts.
On the other hand, Republican judges and politicians have shown in the past that if given a choice between the 1st amendment and helping big businesses line their pockets, they will chose big business every single time.

Also, courts have previously ruled the 1st amendment doesn't protect copyright infringement. Unless SCOTUS wants to fuck off stare decisis like they did when they repealed Roe, there is no way they will rule differently here.

I can only go off of what Null has coped and sneeded about but I think the problem is less of a first amendment issue and more of an utter breakdown of copywrite as we know it.

The basic claim is that the site has some responsibility because it was used to post links, however Null has no control over what other sites hosts and distribute nor is it his responsibility to check the content of those links.

This opens a very nasty gateway into a billion lawsuits, it would basically mean the end of linking over the entire internet

 

[AnOminous]

SCOTUS does not give two shits about Amicus briefs.

Amicus briefs are for after cert has been granted. In the insanely unlikely event that occurs, look for the very retards who have spurned us suddenly lining up with amicus briefs.

 

[Markass the Worst]

Amicus briefs are for after cert has been granted.

I remember that in Novak v. City of Parma, The Onion filed a brief but cert was denied afterwards.

 

[Anti Snigger]

View attachment 5770486

Them's 'in odds

 

[Trianon]

SCOTUS does not give two shits about Amicus briefs. They will glance over the executive summary at best. Its a tool to gauge sentiment from demographics and business entities, not to help SCOTUS decide the case.

Hardin's petition already has everything an amicus brief would have anyway.

They might bring them up in oral arguments as a way of testing the party lawyers. Like sometimes the amicus briefs have better legal reasoning, so the judges will incorporate them if they want to give you a win but not in the way you asked for.

 

[mindlessobserver]

Amicus briefs are for after cert has been granted. In the insanely unlikely event that occurs, look for the very retards who have spurned us suddenly lining up with amicus briefs.

You just know they will be two faced about.

"Despite the fact the Amici believe the user's of KiwiFarms are sub human scum who should be killed summarily, there is a legal issue in their situation that could inconvenience us, the Good Guys...".